GunBroker.com Message Forums
Review our Posting Guidelines
GunBroker.com Message Forums
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?   Trouble / Can't log in?

 All Forums
 GunBroker.com Message Forums
 Ask the Experts
 Sig 320
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

MYOMY
New Member

53 Posts

Posted - 11/08/2017 :  9:08:57 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Looking for feedback on the Sig 320. Reliability Etc.

charliemeyer007
Advanced Member

USA
5335 Posts

Posted - 11/09/2017 :  12:07:55 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
No clue I'm not into plastic guns or 9mm but google found this

http://www.gunsandammo.com/news/sig-sauer-p320-public-service-announcement/

there are severel youtube vids I didn't look at due to lack of interest in the topic.

Isn't this the new US wonder pistol to replace the last wonder pistol that replace an actual pistol IMHO.
Go to Top of Page

rufe-snow
Advanced Member

17717 Posts

Posted - 11/09/2017 :  01:03:06 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Since the U.S. Army adopted it this year. To replace the Beretta, that we have been using since the 80's. It's probably better than a Hi-Point. But how much is questionable?

I never owned a Hi-Point, but have shot other people's. They always worked, and are way heavy. Being made of die cast Zinc.

The Army would have saved a bundle by adopting the Hi-Point, as our service pistol. Using it as a club, if ammo ran out. Way better in that respect, compared to the SIG.

Go to Top of Page

tsr1965
Advanced Member

USA
7837 Posts

Posted - 11/09/2017 :  05:49:19 AM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Just because the US Army adopted it does not mean it is any good. There are issues of it going off when dropped, and other reliability issues. It seems that Sig undercut everyone, including themselves to get the contract, including themselves. They are going to be loosing millions of dollars, in recalls/retrofits, training, and not to mention, they are selling the pistol to the military for less than they can build it for.

If you are looking for reliability in combat Tupperware, Glock is still the golden standard by which All(steel framed pistols, including the 1911's, included) other's are judged. S&W, and FN are very close, with Springfield, coming in a close 3rd place.


Take a look at these auctions on the otherside...
http://www.GunBroker.com/Auction/BrowseItems.aspx?IncludeSellers=484399

http://www.GunBroker.com/All/BI.aspx?IncludeSellers=716063

Go to Top of Page

MYOMY
New Member

53 Posts

Posted - 11/09/2017 :  10:09:36 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks for the input. Was just curious as I own M&Ps/ Glock's etc.
Go to Top of Page

MYOMY
New Member

53 Posts

Posted - 11/09/2017 :  10:20:24 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
As to the Military purchasing these just remember you are dealing with the brain trust at the Pentagon
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
GunBroker.com Message Forums © 1999-2017 GB Investments, Inc. All Rights Reserved Go To Top Of Page
Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.06


Visit GunBroker.com at: www.gunbroker.com
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the site's User Agreement
Site Map