In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Michael Moore

http://www.big-boys.com/articles/toomuchgun.html
If they don't trust us with guns, how can we trust them with the government?
If they don't trust us with guns, how can we trust them with the government?
Comments
He says he only hires former SEAL's and Special Forces to work security for him.
Makes me wonder what sort of vets would sign on with this azzhat.
That fat rabble rouser is a lying piece of pig poop and I wouldnt waste a squirt of piss if he was on fire!! bleen that fat bleening slimy greaseball!!! [:(!][:(!][:(!][:(!]
[;)]
That fat rabble rouser is a lying piece of pig poop and I wouldnt waste a squirt of piss if he was on fire!! bleen that fat bleening slimy greaseball!!! [:(!][:(!][:(!][:(!]
YEAH!
What he said.
....at the end of the day hes probably got more money than most of us and hes entitled to his opinion.
How much money someone accumulates only means how many toys they have. At the end of the day it's how they chose to live their life.
His legacy will be that of a prostitute.
quote:Originally posted by nards444
....at the end of the day hes probably got more money than most of us and hes entitled to his opinion.
How much money someone accumulates only means how many toys they have. At the end of the day it's how they chose to live their life.
His legacy will be that of a prostitute.
I could care less about the guy. Honestly he may act the way he does in public to make money and laughs all the way to the bank about it. I could care less about him. By you and I sitting here talking about him he is making money and this is what he wants. If people just left him alone he wouldnt have any money.
End of the day he does nothing illegal, but maye say things that are borderline inmoral, but really who cares they are just words. Nobody has to read, watch, or consume his products. Again hes american he might be scum, but hes entitled to say what he wishes and Im happy that he can, just like I am happy that you or I can sit here and talk just as bad about him.
Money is a lot more than toys its about being comfortable, eating filet vs ramon, its about having a nice retirement. Either way thats what he chose, who am i say if hes right or wrong. The guy stoops pretty low at times, but probably not quite as low as prostitute.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
To say nothing of whether anyone he does hire will put forth their best effort to protect him.
'Sorry, didn't see the guy with the bazooka. My bad.'
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Who?
Bingo.
Why let him live rent free in your head?
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Estimated net worth of $50 million. If that's not wealthy to you, then you've earned more than I thought.
That fat rabble rouser is a lying piece of pig poop and I wouldnt waste a squirt of piss if he was on fire!! bleen that fat bleening slimy greaseball!!! [:(!][:(!][:(!][:(!]
Very well said and accurate.[^][^][^][^]
quote:Originally posted by jimdeere
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Estimated net worth of $50 million. If that's not wealthy to you, then you've earned more than I thought.
You're starting to sound like a Fan!
Not a fan of the guy at all. But I think his recent comments were taken out of context and spun to a certain degree. Which I dont feel bad for him as he does the same. But at the end of the day hes probably got more money than most of us and hes entitled to his opinion.
"snipers are cowards" was the quote. the context is that he was TAUGHT by his dad that
"snipers are cowards" if he was taught that, then THATS what he believes.
on a side note - that gives us great insight why he is the way he is. pos dad = pos MM.
now if I were raised by a white supremacist and spouted their bs, then everyone would be appalled but if I were to be "taught" that the US was an oppressive world bully then I'd be a hero on the left.
whats the difference between hating some one because of the color of their skin, religious affiliation, OR because they are an American that believes that America is good?
but as we say dan heeah - "the best part of that boy ran down his mommas leg"[:D]
quote:Originally posted by nards444
Not a fan of the guy at all. But I think his recent comments were taken out of context and spun to a certain degree. Which I dont feel bad for him as he does the same. But at the end of the day hes probably got more money than most of us and hes entitled to his opinion.
"snipers are cowards" was the quote. the context is that he was TAUGHT by his dad that
"snipers are cowards" if he was taught that, then THATS what he believes.
on a side note - that gives us great insight why he is the way he is. pos dad = pos MM.
now if I were raised by a white supremacist and spouted their bs, then everyone would be appalled but if I were to be "taught" that the US was an oppressive world bully then I'd be a hero on the left.
whats the difference between hating some one because of the color of their skin, religious affiliation, OR because they are an American that believes that America is good?
but as we say dan eh - "the best part of that boy ran down his mommas leg"
Im not sure three words gives us full context on what he meant. Who did he say this to, what was rest of the conversation? Did the reporter leave out other parts of the interview? What question(s) was he asked? Thats why I say context.
really at the end of the day, if draw the fact he disliked snipers, so what, if he disliked chris kyle because he was a sniper, again so what. Hes entitled to that, just like you and I can not like Michael Moore. At the end of the day whats the big fray about it.
quote:Originally posted by rambo rebel
quote:Originally posted by nards444
Not a fan of the guy at all. But I think his recent comments were taken out of context and spun to a certain degree. Which I dont feel bad for him as he does the same. But at the end of the day hes probably got more money than most of us and hes entitled to his opinion.
"snipers are cowards" was the quote. the context is that he was TAUGHT by his dad that
"snipers are cowards" if he was taught that, then THATS what he believes.
on a side note - that gives us great insight why he is the way he is. pos dad = pos MM.
now if I were raised by a white supremacist and spouted their bs, then everyone would be appalled but if I were to be "taught" that the US was an oppressive world bully then I'd be a hero on the left.
whats the difference between hating some one because of the color of their skin, religious affiliation, OR because they are an American that believes that America is good?
but as we say dan eh - "the best part of that boy ran down his mommas leg"
Im not sure three words gives us full context on what he meant. Who did he say this to, what was rest of the conversation? Did the reporter leave out other parts of the interview? What question(s) was he asked? Thats why I say context.
really at the end of the day, if draw the fact he disliked snipers, so what, if he disliked chris kyle because he was a sniper, again so what. Hes entitled to that, just like you and I can not like Michael Moore. At the end of the day whats the big fray about it.
well I will TRY again - he said "I was taught that snipers were cowards" no other context is really needed is there?
now he didn't say SOME snipers, or "but I don't believe that now because" .....
He just left it at that. So what possible "context" sentence did he say prior to, or after that sentence that would put that statement in a different perspective?
I can say that I was taught that Lincoln's emancipation proclamation freed the slaves and if I leave it at that then you'd think he freed ALL the slaves. I too believed that until I read the document an found for myself that Lincoln only freed the slaves in federally held (conquered) lands in the south. It DID NOT free the few slaves in the north or in the rest of confederacy. just a "little" detail left out of the history books.
SO - GIVE ME THE "CONTEXT" OF WHICH YOU SPEAK THAT WOULD ALTER THE
MEANING OF HIS ORIGINAL STATEMENT - "WE WERE TAUGHT THAT SNIPERS WERE COWARDS"
betcha can't
Am I defending michael moore, no, I think hes off his rocker. But From what he said I dont know what I can really draw from it. And its not necessarily what he said before or after, its what he was asked before and after. Without the full context of the interview its really hard to come to a full conclusion. And really the next three words out of his mouth could totally negate his first three words.
And if you have never been around the media which Im guessing you havent, you then dont understand what they ask, how they ask, and then what they choose to print.
And if in fact Michael Moore thinks snipers are cowards, SO WHAT!! hes not the only one nor will be the last one. Military and non mmilitary alike have dispised snipers for centuries.
quote:Originally posted by nards444
quote:Originally posted by rambo rebel
quote:Originally posted by nards444
Not a fan of the guy at all. But I think his recent comments were taken out of context and spun to a certain degree. Which I dont feel bad for him as he does the same. But at the end of the day hes probably got more money than most of us and hes entitled to his opinion.
"snipers are cowards" was the quote. the context is that he was TAUGHT by his dad that
"snipers are cowards" if he was taught that, then THATS what he believes.
on a side note - that gives us great insight why he is the way he is. pos dad = pos MM.
now if I were raised by a white supremacist and spouted their bs, then everyone would be appalled but if I were to be "taught" that the US was an oppressive world bully then I'd be a hero on the left.
whats the difference between hating some one because of the color of their skin, religious affiliation, OR because they are an American that believes that America is good?
but as we say dan eh - "the best part of that boy ran down his mommas leg"
Im not sure three words gives us full context on what he meant. Who did he say this to, what was rest of the conversation? Did the reporter leave out other parts of the interview? What question(s) was he asked? Thats why I say context.
really at the end of the day, if draw the fact he disliked snipers, so what, if he disliked chris kyle because he was a sniper, again so what. Hes entitled to that, just like you and I can not like Michael Moore. At the end of the day whats the big fray about it.
People just like you
is what Joseph Stahlin spoke of
descension from within
thus the flaming liberal tag fits you.
you got me
the thing that gets me about the outta context crowd is that they RARELY provide the context when they claim it.
if you want to put out the context argument then it behooves you to provide that context of which you claim in order to support your argument.
thats all I'm trying to get at.
coulda???? now we are getting into that? MM could be acting like a lib and is really Rush in make up.
the thing that gets me about the outta context crowd is that they RARELY provide the context when they claim it.
if you want to put out the context argument then it behooves you to provide that context of which you claim in order to support your argument.
thats all I'm trying to get at.
Im not saying it was outta context and not sitting here saying he was right or wrong. What I am saying is how can I or anybody condem or relieve him without knowing the context? Skip context all together, where's the transcript from the interview? Was it even an interview, or just an ambush from a reporter? Now assuming past actions and his MO we might be able to come up with a pretty good conclusion.
Like I said already, if in fact MM said meant he hated snipers and thought they were cowards. My question is so what? Im not getting my panties in a not over it.
quote:Originally posted by DBMJR1
Who?
Bingo.
Why let him live rent free in your head?
..That is one of the best pieces of advice I've heard in years.
Made my wife cackle too. It's applicable to a couple folks we know..[^]
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Depends on what you consider wealthy. His net worth is estimated at $50 million, that's pretty wealthy in my book. He may be a socialist prick, but he's a wealthy socialist prick.
Makes me wonder what sort of vets would sign on with this azzhat.
The kind that has bills to pay and dreams to build. One can't really be to ideological in that kind of business. You can't risk alienating one particular client and lose out of other potential opportunities in referrals. I am sure it sucks for Secret service Agents too that have no respect for Obama.
quote:Originally posted by jimdeere
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Depends on what you consider wealthy. His net worth is estimated at $50 million, that's pretty wealthy in my book. He may be a socialist prick, but he's a wealthy socialist prick.
Apparently you're a fan, too.
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by jimdeere
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Depends on what you consider wealthy. His net worth is estimated at $50 million, that's pretty wealthy in my book. He may be a socialist prick, but he's a wealthy socialist prick.
Apparently you're a fan, too.
Pretty sure hes not. Just stating the man is worth in excess of 50 million which makes him rich, thats a fact. doesnt meant anybody likes him or not.
quote:Originally posted by cce1302
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by jimdeere
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Depends on what you consider wealthy. His net worth is estimated at $50 million, that's pretty wealthy in my book. He may be a socialist prick, but he's a wealthy socialist prick.
Apparently you're a fan, too.
Pretty sure hes not. Just stating the man is worth in excess of 50 million which makes him rich, thats a fact. doesnt meant anybody likes him or not.
Apparently calling someone a socialist prick passes for a compliment these days! [;)]
quote:Originally posted by nards444
quote:Originally posted by cce1302
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by jimdeere
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Depends on what you consider wealthy. His net worth is estimated at $50 million, that's pretty wealthy in my book. He may be a socialist prick, but he's a wealthy socialist prick.
Apparently you're a fan, too.
Pretty sure hes not. Just stating the man is worth in excess of 50 million which makes him rich, thats a fact. doesnt meant anybody likes him or not.
Apparently calling someone a socialist prick passes for a compliment these days! [;)]
to be honest i could care less what people think of me right now, but I would care even less if I had 50 million bucks
quote:Originally posted by cce1302
quote:Originally posted by shilowar
quote:Originally posted by jimdeere
I doubt that he's all that wealthy. He has produced 2 or 3 mildly successful documentaries.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0601619/
Evidently, he's a liberal media darling, but I wouldn't think that pays all that well.
Depends on what you consider wealthy. His net worth is estimated at $50 million, that's pretty wealthy in my book. He may be a socialist prick, but he's a wealthy socialist prick.
Apparently you're a fan, too.
Pretty sure hes not. Just stating the man is worth in excess of 50 million which makes him rich, thats a fact. doesnt meant anybody likes him or not.
See above where I was accused of being a fan for pointing out that he's got $50 million.
In case anyone's interested, American Sniper is playing there three times daily.
This is not a joke. [:D]