In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Concealed big guns
Josey1
Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
Concealed big guns
Are they rich enough to hire bodyguards?
By Ted Lang
Published 05. 17. 02 at 21:42 Sierra Time
xx
We should all be familiar with the three basic tiers of the media elements dedicated to the destruction of our society: owners, editors/publishers, and the bottom echelon comprised of reporters and commentators. And we know they act in unison as the propagandists to attack our family values, religion, and to promote litigation that attacks our constitutional law by supporting programs, politicians and judges who carry out and implement their agenda.
That same three-tiered organizational structure can be found in other organizations, such as gun control organizations dedicated to the total disarmament of Americans, or any other organization opposing American standards such as NOW, NEA, PETA, Sierra Club, etc. They all have extremely wealthy or well-funded heads, many of whom are behind-the-scenes big shots, the middle level field management similar to the editor/publisher level in the media, and the lower or grass roots level.
Clearly, the level of ideological "intellect" relates directly to such an organization's hierarchical structure, with the highest intellect at the highest level of command, and the lowest at the grass roots level. This conforms with Karl Marx's concept of "useful idiots." On the other hand, dedication relates inversely to the hierarchical structure. That's because dedication to an anti-American left-wing cause is fueled by emotion. All one needs to do to confirm such an analysis is to recall the scenes of organized mass rallies convened at the direction of the likes of a Mussolini, or a Hitler, or a Stalin.
The grass roots members of such organizations run on emotional "sugar highs," and therefore provide the "populist" connection capitalized upon by newspaper editors and TV network news anchors to help propel the selected destructive agenda to as many of the gullible as possible. The gullible are so because the media informs them selectively on aspects favorable to the latter's views on an issue, and suppresses the unfavorable.
Of course, the real manipulators, and therefore the most dangerous, are the top dogs and powerful big shots behind the scenes. Seldom are they ever identified, but they surely exist. Who were the big shots who picked Bush to run for president? Do you know them? Any of them? Was a Republican Party national convention even necessary? Yet we the people and the taxpayer picked up the tab.
Liberals advocate an agenda based on falsehoods and lies. Their very name is a lie - they're socialists! What can be said of members of a political philosophy that cannot even be honest as regards the name they choose to identify themselves with? That's probably why they relate so well to other Peoples' Republics, like the one in Cuba.
God bless Dr. Michael Brown of Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws. I guess his organization formed in response to the lying anti-constitutional "American" Medical Association and their government counterparts in the Center for Disease Control. The latter liberal organizations oppose firearms ownership and the Second Amendment, basing their arguments upon standard liberal lies and falsehoods.
In a recent article posted April 25th on NewsMax.com entitled "Americans for Gun Safety," Dr. Brown exposes behind-the-scenes big gun, or should I say, big anti-gun, Andrew McKelvey. McKelvey isn't a millionaire - he's a billionaire! Before proceeding, ask yourself this question: Is this guy rich enough to be able to afford his own aircraft, bulletproof luxury limousines, and a large contingent of heavily armed body guards and troops? Sorry for digressing.
Dr. Brown points out that McKelvey "heads" Americans for Gun Safety [AGS], but what is unusual, is that it has no members! It is just a front organization for this single, solitary individual, yet he is running an anti-gun campaign of expensive radio commercials to attack legitimate gun shows and gun dealers because he doesn't like anyone in America owning a gun. He's got bodyguards, so why should you be allowed your constitutional freedom to buy or have one like one of his bodyguards? Sound familiar? It should be - it's the Rosie O'Big Mouth argument all over again!
McKelvey would be welcomed by Sam Newhouse's Newark Star Ledger, the same paper that told me I wasn't qualified when writing on the astonishing report issued by the liberal Police Foundation per Janet Reno's request that revealed that Clinton's 1994 crime legislation was a dismal failure. McKelvey would be qualified because he's the head of a prestigious organization advancing monetarily their agenda. And let's not forget Newhouse's newspapers in advocating the destruction of the Boy Scouts while promoting pedophilia. As you may recall, I established the Newhouse connection in prior columns.
http://www.sierratimes.com/02/05/18/tedlang.htm
c 2002 SierraTimes.com (unless otherwise noted)
"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
Are they rich enough to hire bodyguards?
By Ted Lang
Published 05. 17. 02 at 21:42 Sierra Time
xx
We should all be familiar with the three basic tiers of the media elements dedicated to the destruction of our society: owners, editors/publishers, and the bottom echelon comprised of reporters and commentators. And we know they act in unison as the propagandists to attack our family values, religion, and to promote litigation that attacks our constitutional law by supporting programs, politicians and judges who carry out and implement their agenda.
That same three-tiered organizational structure can be found in other organizations, such as gun control organizations dedicated to the total disarmament of Americans, or any other organization opposing American standards such as NOW, NEA, PETA, Sierra Club, etc. They all have extremely wealthy or well-funded heads, many of whom are behind-the-scenes big shots, the middle level field management similar to the editor/publisher level in the media, and the lower or grass roots level.
Clearly, the level of ideological "intellect" relates directly to such an organization's hierarchical structure, with the highest intellect at the highest level of command, and the lowest at the grass roots level. This conforms with Karl Marx's concept of "useful idiots." On the other hand, dedication relates inversely to the hierarchical structure. That's because dedication to an anti-American left-wing cause is fueled by emotion. All one needs to do to confirm such an analysis is to recall the scenes of organized mass rallies convened at the direction of the likes of a Mussolini, or a Hitler, or a Stalin.
The grass roots members of such organizations run on emotional "sugar highs," and therefore provide the "populist" connection capitalized upon by newspaper editors and TV network news anchors to help propel the selected destructive agenda to as many of the gullible as possible. The gullible are so because the media informs them selectively on aspects favorable to the latter's views on an issue, and suppresses the unfavorable.
Of course, the real manipulators, and therefore the most dangerous, are the top dogs and powerful big shots behind the scenes. Seldom are they ever identified, but they surely exist. Who were the big shots who picked Bush to run for president? Do you know them? Any of them? Was a Republican Party national convention even necessary? Yet we the people and the taxpayer picked up the tab.
Liberals advocate an agenda based on falsehoods and lies. Their very name is a lie - they're socialists! What can be said of members of a political philosophy that cannot even be honest as regards the name they choose to identify themselves with? That's probably why they relate so well to other Peoples' Republics, like the one in Cuba.
God bless Dr. Michael Brown of Doctors for Sensible Gun Laws. I guess his organization formed in response to the lying anti-constitutional "American" Medical Association and their government counterparts in the Center for Disease Control. The latter liberal organizations oppose firearms ownership and the Second Amendment, basing their arguments upon standard liberal lies and falsehoods.
In a recent article posted April 25th on NewsMax.com entitled "Americans for Gun Safety," Dr. Brown exposes behind-the-scenes big gun, or should I say, big anti-gun, Andrew McKelvey. McKelvey isn't a millionaire - he's a billionaire! Before proceeding, ask yourself this question: Is this guy rich enough to be able to afford his own aircraft, bulletproof luxury limousines, and a large contingent of heavily armed body guards and troops? Sorry for digressing.
Dr. Brown points out that McKelvey "heads" Americans for Gun Safety [AGS], but what is unusual, is that it has no members! It is just a front organization for this single, solitary individual, yet he is running an anti-gun campaign of expensive radio commercials to attack legitimate gun shows and gun dealers because he doesn't like anyone in America owning a gun. He's got bodyguards, so why should you be allowed your constitutional freedom to buy or have one like one of his bodyguards? Sound familiar? It should be - it's the Rosie O'Big Mouth argument all over again!
McKelvey would be welcomed by Sam Newhouse's Newark Star Ledger, the same paper that told me I wasn't qualified when writing on the astonishing report issued by the liberal Police Foundation per Janet Reno's request that revealed that Clinton's 1994 crime legislation was a dismal failure. McKelvey would be qualified because he's the head of a prestigious organization advancing monetarily their agenda. And let's not forget Newhouse's newspapers in advocating the destruction of the Boy Scouts while promoting pedophilia. As you may recall, I established the Newhouse connection in prior columns.
http://www.sierratimes.com/02/05/18/tedlang.htm
c 2002 SierraTimes.com (unless otherwise noted)
"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
Comments
Edited by - thesoundguy1 on 05/18/2002 12:43:10