In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Ruger
dsmith
Member Posts: 902 ✭✭✭✭
Was Sturm Ruger in on the Assault ban? Didn't somebody say that they said something like "you don't need more than ten rounds"?
Comments
I found one that Im going to look at NIB the guy wants 200 for it
sound like a deal he also has a ruger 1022 blue with a Dragunov stock and the wood stock for 150.
taz
[img]http://oldemagics.com/ran all.jpg[/img]
Taxation WITH representation isn't so hot either!
http://www.ruger.com/corporate/news/2012-03-21.html
Boomer
"Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as it is by the obstacles which one has overcome while trying to succeed"
. and the antithesis to this philosophy was uttered by Bill Clinton "I smoked it, but I didn't inhale."[V]
NRA Life Member
Larry
He made that statement in testimony before a senate committee.
Thank this rich,brillent man for single-handedly taking away one of your rights...and giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
And no, I still haven't forgive S&W yet. They support absolutely no gun rights groups. If they support the GOA, I might end my boycott on their guns.
Regards,
Rugster
"Toujours Pret"
Horsepuckey!
NRA ENdowment, CRPA Life, Past President NRA Members Council
Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem. Semper Fidelis
What gun rights have been lost,what rights has anyone lost,the constitution says we have the right to keep and bear arms,we still have that right,no where does it say you have the right to a high cap mag,no where does it say you have the right to a full auto,what it does give you is the right to own a weapon,,arms could mean a bow and arrow or sword. I do not blindly follow any gun lobby group or firearm maker but I do understand many of the compromises they make even if I dont agree with them.Bill Ruger wanted to save Ruger Arms, he wanted to make sure they could continue to make the 10/22,the mark ll and all their other mag fed arms.Yes the 22,000 gun laws on the books at this time is ridiculus but we have to have laws,we can not have firearms being shipped to the homes of 3 time felons,so what laws do we keep and which do we throw out?If they placed a box on the upcomming ballet that gave the choice of losing all mags over 10rds forever but the constitution would be amended to say we could forever and always keep all simi-auto's under that would you vote for it or against it,,sorry but I would be for it.this would give my children and grandchildren the security of knowing they could forever keep grandpa's old guns ,they would just have to learn to change mag's faster [:)]
no where does it say you have the right to a high cap mag,no where does it say you have the right to a full auto...
Please direct me to the section which states that we don't have those rights. Reading the Second Amendment to coincide with your interests is not an argument, and your appeal to evidence justifying your interpretation begs the question. And I certainly have no doubt that I would find your three-digit gun collection about as fascinating as counting Toyota station wagons on a Saturday night.
But just because the Constitution doesn't specifically enumerate a right doesn't mean you don't have it. Or are you fine with the US Gov't abridging your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness just because it's not in the Constitution?
Former Member U.S. Navy Shooting Team
Former NSSA All American
Navy Distinguished Pistol Shot
MO, CT, VA.
After all, the Constitution never specified the materials or language.
Stop, you're embarassing yourself. Or compromise, and mail letters to us all instead of posting........
Back when the first amendment was written, did we have the printing presses? I'm not sure, but I don't think so.
So, maybe the founding fathers didn't want us to be able to reach that many people with our viewpoints, so these "machine presses" are unconstitutional. Maybe they only wanted us to be able to say things in public. Maybe their public included the local saloon, but not the people of other states. Is this ability to reach millions of people with your opinions protected by your right to free speech?
If so, and I firmly believe it is, than your machine guns, that are just like any other gun, but fire much faster, are also protected by the 2nd amendment.
Johann Gutenberg my friend; a good bit before the first amendment, but your point is there all the same [8D]
I have come to believe that,,watching slimy politicians and the NRA force gun laws down the throat of gun owners.
This guy with his 100's of guns is perfectly content to ride on the shoulders of stronger men..men willing to die even for his rights..that he sems willing to trade off for HIS 'collection'....
The day those men are no longer willing..his 100's of guns are gone..taken by forces he has no comprehension of at all...and totally unwilling to learn about from history.
On your mark-get set- go away!!