In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

iraq......

mondmond Member Posts: 6,458
edited May 2006 in General Discussion
iraqi leader says there is a limit to acceptable exuses from US troops that kill civilians...friendly fire,jamming tools, what u think?? always 2 sides..

Comments

  • scottm21166scottm21166 Member Posts: 20,723
    edited November -1
    I think you need to do a 1000 post givaway....I been looking forward to something from the old country[:)][:p][:D] how bout a JAG
  • 11BravoCrunchie11BravoCrunchie Member Posts: 33,423 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think we should say "Screw the Geneva Convention and all their B.S. rules. Our enemies don't follow them, why should we?" And then we should proceed to kill anyone that resists or shows any hostility towards our toops.
  • mondmond Member Posts: 6,458
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Zulu7
    I think we should say "Screw the Geneva Convention and all their B.S. rules. Our enemies don't follow them, why should we?" And then we should proceed to kill anyone that resists or shows any hostility towards our toops.



    GO ON.......THATS THE WAY ![}:)]
  • mondmond Member Posts: 6,458
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by scottm21166
    I think you need to do a 1000 post givaway....I been looking forward to something from the old country[:)][:p][:D] how bout a JAG


    my givaways get there ,looking like they been thru a stampeed & more or less FU**ed, love to give you something...
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx[:D][:D][:D][:D][:D]
  • gclmemgclmem Member Posts: 346 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Testy situation actually. If the civilians don't cooperate with the insurgents/terrorists they are liable to be blasted. If they do cooperate out of fear or whatever our guys have no choice but to blast them as well. Collateral crap in the fan.
  • whiteclouderwhiteclouder Member Posts: 10,574 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If the soldiers are charged and court-martialed, and found guilty of targeting and killing innocent people, they should be punished severely, maybe even executed if the circumstances warrant it. We simply do not shoot children.

    Clouder..
  • Red223Red223 Member Posts: 7,946
    edited November -1
    It's all part of the plot to demoralize America for the coming of the anti-christ to lead them.

    We shoot children all the time, sometimes even unborn:

    http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/05/31/D8HUT0B81.html

    Happens when we are in a country trying to be police you stupid Americans.
  • joeaf1911a1joeaf1911a1 Member Posts: 2,962 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I just dont get it. Are there any "soldiers" killing Amricans over
    there? Seems to me like it is all the armed "Civilians" killing our
    troops. So just who do we shoot at? Seems to me the Military is forced
    into a policy of "get them to love us" (which they will never do for religious reasons) instead of as in WW 2 of getting the job done in any
    way and making them fear us. Ever notice how little the problems were
    in The ETO and the PTO after wars end of soldiers being killed? Back
    then we were a "different breed of cats, including our high ranking officers who took no sh-t from the defeated enemy". As we were told in
    my Inf. Division at wars end "Remember, you are the conquer's". I guess
    that is not true anymore or too Politically Incorrect. But it sure worked for us.
  • whiteclouderwhiteclouder Member Posts: 10,574 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Even in WWII, Joe, we didn't deliberately shoot kids.

    Clouder..
  • warriorsfanwarriorsfan Member Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Zulu7
    I think we should say "Screw the Geneva Convention and all their B.S. rules. Our enemies don't follow them, why should we?" And then we should proceed to kill anyone that resists or shows any hostility towards our toops.




    Then what would make us different from the Islamists? We are supposed to be the good guys, it's this kind of attitude that leads to the execution of innocent civilians, like what took place in Haditha. The ends do not justify the means, is it worth winning a war if you sell your soul to the Devil to do it? This is America, not Nazi Germany, our military is not supposed to kill indiscriminately.

    Those Marines who killed those innocent women and children out of revenge at Haditha should spend the rest of their lives in Leavenworth, but I don't place the blame entirely on them. They are under an incredible amount of stress, fighting a war that cannot be won. Iraq is becoming more like Vietnam every day, now this war has it's own "My Lai." But since our elected leaders found creative ways not to serve in Vietnam, you wouldn't expect them to learn the lessons of that war.
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It's a war, people die, bad stuff happens on both sides. None of it is excusable much of it is understandable.

    Saving private Ryan drives that home very well.
  • shooter4shooter4 Member Posts: 4,457
    edited November -1
    We need to do the job and stop this pc bs, get the media out of there and just finish it.

    It would have been over already.

    And clouder, no US soldier would deliberately shoot a child unless he was wearing a suicide bomb. This enemy is not like anything we have been up against.

    Women and kids wearing bombs.
  • KSUmarksmanKSUmarksman Member Posts: 10,705 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by joeaf1911a1
    I just dont get it. Are there any "soldiers" killing Amricans over
    there? Seems to me like it is all the armed "Civilians" killing our
    troops. So just who do we shoot at? Seems to me the Military is forced
    into a policy of "get them to love us" (which they will never do for religious reasons) instead of as in WW 2 of getting the job done in any
    way and making them fear us. Ever notice how little the problems were
    in The ETO and the PTO after wars end of soldiers being killed? Back
    then we were a "different breed of cats, including our high ranking officers who took no sh-t from the defeated enemy". As we were told in
    my Inf. Division at wars end "Remember, you are the conquer's". I guess
    that is not true anymore or too Politically Incorrect. But it sure worked for us.


    I dunno, I watched Band Of Brother at least ten times now; never saw Easy co. randomly capping civilians because they were pissed at the SS
    There's a slight difference between an insurgent with an AK-47 or RPG and a family cowering in their house in the midst of a firefight.

    If they were killed by rounds coming from OUTSIDE the house, that is an accident. If they were killed INSIDE by soldiers who saw they were unarmed, that is a war-crime.


    When I first heard about this incident I assumed that some mercenaries ("contractors") came in after the Marines left (following the insurgents) and that the mercenaries had their fun with the civilians. There are already examples of "contractors" shooting up civvies and US troops/Iraqi security. However all sources seem to say that it was the Marines that were responsible. I simply can't judge based on the evidence we actually get to see.
  • GuvamintCheeseGuvamintCheese Member Posts: 38,932
    edited November -1
    There are criminals in all walks of life, military included!
  • lazeruslazerus Member Posts: 1,950 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by whiteclouder
    Even in WWII, Joe, we didn't deliberately shoot kids.

    Clouder..


    Yes we did. Just nowhere near as much on TV.
  • gruntledgruntled Member Posts: 8,218 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Posted - 05/31/2006 : 10:21:13 AM

    I think we should say "Screw the Geneva Convention and all their B.S. rules. Our enemies don't follow them, why should we?" And then we should proceed to kill anyone that resists or shows any hostility towards our toops.
    Zulu7,
    32nd Seperate Infantry Brigade, Wisconsin
    United States Army

    "My only regret is that I have but one life to give for my country."

    Odd choise of quote you added. Now suppose the Redcoats had had that attitude.
  • PATBUZZARDPATBUZZARD Member Posts: 3,556
    edited November -1
    War is hell. Bad things happen to both good and bad people. War is hell. Problem is we have the damn media. They don't realize that war is hell, they see it all as a political game, and will posture the hell to accomplish whatever they want. Now I'm not saying that we shoudl intentionally kill civilians, but it helps if they stay out of the way. Personally I say do the job, get it done right with the most enemy casualties and fewest friendly. I know i am rambling, so I'll close with this quote from patton: "There is only one tactical principle which is not subject to change. It is to use the means at hand to inflict the maximum amount of wounds death and destruction on the enemy in the minimum amount of time." If civilians get in the way... well they shouldn't have been there.
  • jack85jack85 Member Posts: 211 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Gen. Patton in a letter to his wife commented: "I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is 'Liberty, then give me death.' I can't see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it."

    Read "The Patton Papers" and see for yourself!


    Patton continued to do what he thought was right, whenever he could. With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had thrown German families out of their homes to make room for more than a million Jewish DP's -- part of the famous "six million" who had supposedly been gassed -- but he balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories, in accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany's economic basis forever. In his diary he wrote: "I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the factories are being blown up -- that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war -- can be equally well attained through the destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons."

    And in his diary he noted:, "Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc? . . . We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles."


    ...and on December 23, 1945, General George S. Patton was silenced forever. [;)]
Sign In or Register to comment.