In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options
TROOPS CHARGED WITH MURDER
dkb2003
Member Posts: 816 ✭✭✭✭
Are you kidding me?... STOP IT....WTH is going on here...Am i right by saying that our troops are murdered there everyday. An eye for an eye is what i think!!!!!!![:(!][:(!][:(!][:(!][:(!]
Comments
Charging soldiers in a war zone with murder is absurd, UNLESS there are EXTREMELY aggravating circumstances.
EXTREMELY aggravating circumstances are what the Army apparently found, that's why Army investigators are recommeding the DEATH PENALTY for four U.S. soldiers charged with murder:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/02/D8JST4QG0.html
"An Army investigator has recommended the death penalty for four soldiers accused of murder during a raid in Iraq.
Lt. Col. James P. Daniel Jr. made the recommendation in report obtained Saturday by The Associated Press.
Daniel found several aggravating factors that warrant a sentence of death in the case of four soldiers accused of killing three men during the May raid in the Salahuddin province."
Now let's see, who knows more about which sentence is appropriate for soldiers who commit crimes? Is it the United States Army itself, who spent months investigating incidents such as these, or a bunch of right-wing warhawks on a message board? So will all you people who verbally attacked John Murtha for bringing these and similar allegations to light finally apologize and admit you were wrong, or will you now make claims that the US Army is "anti-American" and "hates the troops" or "blames America first?"
quote:Originally posted by nunn
Charging soldiers in a war zone with murder is absurd, UNLESS there are EXTREMELY aggravating circumstances.
EXTREMELY aggravating circumstances are what the Army apparently found, that's why Army investigators are recommeding the DEATH PENALTY for four U.S. soldiers charged with murder:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/02/D8JST4QG0.html
"An Army investigator has recommended the death penalty for four soldiers accused of murder during a raid in Iraq.
Lt. Col. James P. Daniel Jr. made the recommendation in report obtained Saturday by The Associated Press.
Daniel found several aggravating factors that warrant a sentence of death in the case of four soldiers accused of killing three men during the May raid in the Salahuddin province."
Now let's see, who knows more about which sentence is appropriate for soldiers who commit crimes? Is it the United States Army itself, who spent months investigating incidents such as these, or a bunch of right-wing warhawks on a message board? So will all you people who verbally attacked John Murtha for bringing these and similar allegations to light finally apologize and admit you were wrong, or will you now make claims that the US Army is "anti-American" and "hates the troops" or "blames America first?"
John Murtha is a disgrace to the USA, he is a disgusting POS. He had no place to say the things he did about our troops BEFORE charges were brought or the investigation was complete. He impugned the honorable conduct of troops in general for the sins of very few.
So to answer your question; hell no I won't apologize to that pig.
quote:Originally posted by warriorsfan
quote:Originally posted by nunn
Charging soldiers in a war zone with murder is absurd, UNLESS there are EXTREMELY aggravating circumstances.
EXTREMELY aggravating circumstances are what the Army apparently found, that's why Army investigators are recommeding the DEATH PENALTY for four U.S. soldiers charged with murder:
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/09/02/D8JST4QG0.html
"An Army investigator has recommended the death penalty for four soldiers accused of murder during a raid in Iraq.
Lt. Col. James P. Daniel Jr. made the recommendation in report obtained Saturday by The Associated Press.
Daniel found several aggravating factors that warrant a sentence of death in the case of four soldiers accused of killing three men during the May raid in the Salahuddin province."
Now let's see, who knows more about which sentence is appropriate for soldiers who commit crimes? Is it the United States Army itself, who spent months investigating incidents such as these, or a bunch of right-wing warhawks on a message board? So will all you people who verbally attacked John Murtha for bringing these and similar allegations to light finally apologize and admit you were wrong, or will you now make claims that the US Army is "anti-American" and "hates the troops" or "blames America first?"
John Murtha is a disgrace to the USA, he is a disgusting POS. He had no place to say the things he did about our troops BEFORE charges were brought or the investigation was complete. He impugned the honorable conduct of troops in general for the sins of very few.
So to answer your question; hell no I won't apologize to that pig.
You make me all warm and fuzzy inside sir[:p][:p][:p]