In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

getting new pistol whitch one ?

boltactionboltaction Member Posts: 505 ✭✭✭
edited February 2009 in Ask the Experts
Trying to figure out what 22 cal. pistol to get. I'am down to a ruger mark lll a smith&wesson a22 or a Browning Buck Mark.Anyone out there shooting any of these how do each compare.I'll be useing it to shoot informal target practice. Thanks

Comments

  • lcdrdanrlcdrdanr Member Posts: 439 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    They are all exceptionally good firearms, you should try each and see which you prefer. Each has it's own strong points.
    I prefer the Ruger Mark II to the Mark III but that's more from habit and what I am accustomed to than any issues with the gun itself.
    I cannot shoot a Buckmark because of the swell in the grip is in exactly the wrong place for me to hold the gun properly. I have tried to shoot one and it is just too uncomfortable but that's grip design, not the gun itself. I just resist purchasing a gun that doesn't feel right and having to buy after market grips in order to shoot it. Your milage may vary.

    My wife prefers the Walther P22 over all of them although I don't think it is as accurate in the 3.2" barrel, it certainly isn't as heavy and that's probably why she likes it instead.

    Dan R
  • machine gun moranmachine gun moran Member Posts: 5,198
    edited November -1
    I've had all three, and right now my .22 is a Buckmark. But I prefer the takedown on the Ruger, far and away. All three are decent guns, so if you've got a three-sided coin to toss...
  • NOTPARSNOTPARS Member Posts: 2,081 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I like the Ruger (I have a Mark II) but it can be large and heavy for some folks. I also like the SIG and the Walther .22s which fit smaller hands pretty well. I have a friend who bought a Ruger in the target model. He tookd me shooting bowling pins at 50 yards. I was very impressed with its accuracy.
  • gotstolefromgotstolefrom Member Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I picked up a Ruger 22/45 , to replace a piece that was stolen.
    I had experience with the Mark II and Woodsman.

    I was interested in the 'new' grip angle for the Ruger that mimicks the 'ancient' 1911 grip angle.
    The 8 inch bull barrel on this 'target model' probably contributes more to the feel of this gun than the grip angle alone.

    It shoots anything I've put in it, and with choice ammo it shoots excellent groups. There is no recoil or muzzle rise with the heavy bbl, making double taps childs play.

    I found the trigger surprizingly crisp and light for an 'out of the box' factory set trigger.
    I've had no trouble with it other than some cycling problems...finally...after about 600 rounds of filthy shooting ammo.

    I've had other auto pistols in 22, and have been happy with them.
    If I bought another 22 auto for any reason, I believe I would give another Ruger a try.

    Just my 2 cents

    ENJOY !!!
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I grew up with Woodsmen, and now shoot Buckmarks, as well as S&W Model 63. I just don't care for the looks of the Ruger. Probably a poor reason not to shoot one, but life is too short to shoot ugly guns.
  • quickmajikquickmajik Member Posts: 15,576 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have a beretta u-22 right now and it is good as a fun gun for plinking cans and black birds and the like..
  • RobinRobin Member Posts: 1,228 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It is really hard to beat a Ruger Mark II. I also have a 22/45 and would recomend either to anyone.
  • hillbillehillbille Member Posts: 14,461 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Personally I like the feel of the browning, and I think that should be the answer you need, go to a local gun shop and pick one of each up and get a feel of each one. as shooters I think each one is about equal.should come down to which one feels best in your hand.
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In true internet fashion of answering the question with a choice you didn't provide, I'll say if you are interested in shooting targets, pick a Hi-standard!

    Its better than all of the above, having great sights (that are designed to be adjusted with a coin) and a match trigger out of the box. Plus, unlike the other three, these are collectible, no longer made, and will only increase in value. Lastly, you'll get envious (or at least curious) looks at the range if you show up with one. Of course you won't really find a "new" one (unless you want to pay an astronomical amount for it), but the used ones are still probably better than new models of the other three.

    As to the other three, I've shot all of them, and they're all a little different. All three are pretty accurate, probably more than all but the very best can take advantage of. None of the three could be considered competitive bullseye guns out of the box mainly because of the triggers (though the Browning is probably the closest to that).

    It comes down to personal preference. Assuming cost isn't an issue, gor target shooting, I'd say whichever feels nicest in your hand is the best pick for you, and it probably really is that simple.

    The Smith is a good gun, the cheapest of the three, the easiest to strip and clean, and the easiest to mount an optic on (the top of the gun *IS* a scope rail). The Smith also lets you swap out barrels in a matter of seconds. That's nice if you want to keep one with iron sights, and one with a dot sight, for example. I'm pretty sure the Smith is lightest of the three also, for whatever that's worth (and some people prefer HEAVIER .22s for shooting targets. . .I do).

    The Smith has two disadvantages. The grips are a little long from front-to-back, and there really aren't many replacement grips on the market except the ones that Smith makes, meaning if your hand doesn't fit the gun, you're out of luck.

    The other advantage is pretty minor. The recoil spring of the gun rests against a hard plastic buffer, that eventually wears out and needs replacement. Not a big deal since the gun is so easy to strip, and the part is readily available from Smith cheap, but a minor annoyance.

    Ruger is probably the toughest of the lot and comes in the most variations of barrel length, grip, etc. There are more accessories available for it than the others (including stuff like drop in match triggers, and grips), which is a plus. But, its a bit tricky to learn how to strip and clean.

    I personally like the slant grip style of the Ruger, though many do not. The .22/45 versions with the 1911-like grips are a viable option if you don't.

    Browning, IMO, is the nicest of the three, but IIRC you need tools to take it down to clean, and you have to re-zero it after doing so.
  • one2hutnone2hutn Member Posts: 261 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    To add another that wasn't an option. S&W Model 41 I got one tears ago and love it. Realized after I grew up a little what a good purchase I had made.
  • tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    My vote is for the Browning Buckmark. If the factory grips do not meet your requirements, then there are a host of aftermarket things available.

    Best.
  • MatchshotMatchshot Member Posts: 452 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I will give you one more to look at:

    Hammerli Trailside. I have the 6" Barrel version with Adj. Sights. Best .22 out there, simple take down, full size ambi dextrous stock. Accurate as all get out right out of the box.
Sign In or Register to comment.