In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Mossberg 9200 Scary Problem **UPDATE**

westkybandedwestkybanded Member Posts: 259 ✭✭✭
edited February 2009 in Ask the Experts
http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=299089&SearchTerms=mossberg,9200

I'm sure you guys probably don't remember this thread, but I'll continue on:

Well, nearly a year later, and I remember to send this thing off last week...
Got a call this afternoon from Mossberg with the bad news that the gun was discontinued and they had run out of parts for it. Couldn't fix.

Good news is...

They're replacing it with a brand new Model 930 with a 24" turkey barrel, a 28" barrel, a regular stock, and a pistol-grip stock with the whole deal dipped in MO Breakup..... gratis.

All they have to do is transfer the SN to the new gun and ship.

THAT is the definition of good customer service. That gun was probably 15-20 years old. Who does that anymore???

People may give me crap for shooting a Mossberg 500 and I have for years, but the company stands behind it's product 1000%

** I did ask the guy at the end of the call if they knew what was wrong with the old gun, and he said they didn't care enough to even look.**

Comments

  • tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Their products should not have to be returned for warranty work no where nearly as much as they do. That is called shoddy quality and workmanship. Worst part is, that everyone else is trying to compete with their junk guns by making junk guns themselves...hence the new Remington 887.

    Lastly,

    I am quite sure that them "transferring the serial number", is not legal as the new gun, is not only just a new gun, but a new model. Last I knew a mfg had to put a new serial number on a new gun. Still sure you like to deal with them?

    Best
  • westkybandedwestkybanded Member Posts: 259 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Yep. I'm positive I like to deal with them.

    What other company would take back a 15+ yr old product that is discontinued and exchange it for a brand new model??

    As far as the SN issue, you're wrong. The old receiver can be destroyed and the old # attached to the new gun. Simple as that.
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by tsr1965
    Their products should not have to be returned for warranty work no where nearly as much as they do. That is called shoddy quality and workmanship. Worst part is, that everyone else is trying to compete with their junk guns by making junk guns themselves...hence the new Remington 887.

    Lastly,

    I am quite sure that them "transferring the serial number", is not legal as the new gun, is not only just a new gun, but a new model. Last I knew a mfg had to put a new serial number on a new gun. Still sure you like to deal with them?

    Best
    How do yuou know if the 887 is a "junk gun" when it hasn't been released yet?

    Have you had a chance to test fire any of Remington's prototypes?
  • tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
    quote:Originally posted by tsr1965
    Their products should not have to be returned for warranty work no where nearly as much as they do. That is called shoddy quality and workmanship. Worst part is, that everyone else is trying to compete with their junk guns by making junk guns themselves...hence the new Remington 887.

    Lastly,

    I am quite sure that them "transferring the serial number", is not legal as the new gun, is not only just a new gun, but a new model. Last I knew a mfg had to put a new serial number on a new gun. Still sure you like to deal with them?

    Best
    How do yuou know if the 887 is a "junk gun" when it hasn't been released yet?

    Have you had a chance to test fire any of Remington's prototypes?


    Its new and its coming from Remington, and at under $350.00 MSRP, you do the math.

    EDIT:

    barto,

    I have an 870 express(actually 2 of them)...they are indeed an 870, and not over 50% over moulded plastic. Remingtons quality control at present SUCKS, and a plastic gun is not going to make it any better. Your 870 is proven!
  • bartobarto Member Posts: 4,734 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I paid less than $350 for my 870 express & have been doing the math with it for 12 years w/o a hiccup.
    [^]barto[^]
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    quote:Its new and its coming from Remington, and at under $350.00 MSRP, you do the math.My calculations say I'll be getting one hell of a bargain.
  • MossbergboogieMossbergboogie Member Posts: 12,211
    edited November -1
    West, I dont think you had a problem with your gun. I still believe it was the ammo. But in the end it all worked out for you. Congrats[:)]
  • tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ElMuertoMonkey
    quote:Its new and its coming from Remington, and at under $350.00 MSRP, you do the math.My calculations say I'll be getting one hell of a bargain.


    You have one of those Mexican calculators that still has the beans in it?
  • nunnnunn Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 36,085 ******
    edited November -1
    Great! Don't try that with a Ruger!
  • varianvarian Member Posts: 2,265 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    bought a moss. 500 in 410 at a gun show. was beautiful, looked to be a 99% gun. got it home, shot 12 inches low at 20 yrd, wouldn't eject or feed properly. called mossberg with all details, telling them i bought it used. they ask me to send it to them, they repaired all problems including a new barrel for NO CHARGE. great company
Sign In or Register to comment.