In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

S&W Airweight

FGColonelFGColonel Member Posts: 18 ✭✭
edited February 2009 in Ask the Experts
I RECENTLY PICKED UP A STUBBY AIRWEIGHT AND THERE IS NO MODEL STAMPED ON FRAME, RIGHT SIDE BBL 1 7/8 STEEL BBL SAYS AIRWEIGHT 38 SPC CTG SQUARE DIAMOND GRIP S/N GRIPS YOKE FRAME MATCH C406XXX RAMPED FRONT SIGHT, SEE 4 SCREW HEADS TRIGGER GUARD, 2 FRAME AND 1 FRONT GRIP TAG SAYS MODEL 10 CASE HARDENED TRIGGER AND HAMMER MAY BE ALLOY FRAME, ON SURFACE ON CYLINDER ARM 48127 THEN LOOKS LIKE A m AND A 6 OR A 9 NO S/W LOGO ON LEFT SIDE FRAME. DEFINITE A ALUMINUM FRAME STEEL CYLINDER AND BBL, WAS WONDERING WHAT MODEL IS THIS , COULD IT BE A PRE MODEL 10 BUT THE AIRWEIGHT IS THROWING ME OFF,AND YEAR OF MFG , NO BOX, VERY LITTLE CYLINDER WARE S&W LOGO DIAMOND WALNUT GRIPS MINT WITH CHECKERING , THANKS update 6 shooter alum frame checked with magnet, steel cylinder and bbl no model 12 stamped anywhere, thanks for the information. the auction tag had it listed as a model 10 , there is no s&w insignia on left side of frame either , i will try to post pics this evening, thanks for all the help and info. Marc update the auction was an estate sale of my neighbor who passed away recently. He was a career lawyer and was a CO in the Air Force at Wright Patterson AFB, he was 83. I was out of state deer hunting during auction and had my neighbor pick it up if it went for a certain price. THey had advertised 3 model 10's and this one was the only stub nose and only one with diamond walnut grips, i didnt have a chance to talk to the auctioneer but i was very happy when i seen it. bbl and cylinder looks like a polished blue if that makes a difference. never mind what looks like scratches on frame, no model number on crane either

Comments

  • FGColonelFGColonel Member Posts: 18 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hey guys, I need a some input from some knowledgeable people, and I am sure this is the right place. I recently purchased a S&W 642 Airweight for my wife to carry. She is a slight thing of petite proportions and small hands. She is no newbie to shooting and although she says she like the gun, I detect a bit of apprehension in her voice. After 34 years of marriage I know her well enough to know the she will not complain about the small things. She carries the gun and loves the size and weight, but when we go to the range she migrates back to her Kimber or my K19 S&W. I think the recoil of the snubby was kind of a surprise to her. I want to make the gun as comfortable as possible for her to carry and shoot. Any suggestions?
  • Colt SuperColt Super Member Posts: 31,007
    edited November -1
    Fred - Welcome to GunBroker.

    Those little snubbies, particularly Airweights, are no fun to shoot.

    Tremendous muzzle blast and very heavy felt recoil, along with a giant flash, combine to make them very unpleasant, unless you're shooting SOMEBODY.

    Frankly, I'd find a different firearm.

    You could maybe try standard load .38 Special range loads, but you aren't going to make those nasty characteristics go away.

    Practice is very important.

    Maybe an all-steel J frame, or a steel K frame 3" would help.

    Best wishes.

    Hope you hang around - this is a great place. Take a look over at the "General Discussion" Forum as well.

    Doug
  • JorgeJorge Member Posts: 10,656 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    If she must carry an Airweight, but cringes at the recoil, Magnaport may be the best solution.

    I carry a Magnaported S&W 340 Airlite Sc. loaded with 125 gr. of Federal's low recoil .357 magnums. Muzzle flip is greatly reduced, and recoil is a bit more manageable.

    I most certainly like that little gun.
  • rsnyder55rsnyder55 Member Posts: 2,526 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In a situation where you need to use it, you probably will not notice the recoil. Seems to work that way hunting also.

    Magnaporting will reduce the felt recoil and perhaps different grips will help with control.
  • v35v35 Member Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Use hollow base wadcutter target loads.
    She'll be able to hit with them.
    Weightwise and sizewise the Airweight J-Frame S&Ws can't be beat.
    I preferred Uncle Mikes Boot Grips over factory wood grips.
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    As mentioned, the recoil on these airweights is BRISK. I have a lot of experience with these, and honestly, I find shooting the airweight snubnoses with .38 specials to be more unpleasant than shooting full house .357 magnum rounds from an all steel gun.

    The short muzzle also makes quite a loud "bang" and provides lots of muzzle flash too, which adds to the subjective unpleasantness.

    A firm (I'd say "deathlike") grip is critical to controlling the recoil on these light revolvers.

    As a suggestion, I've done the "Pepsi" challenge with this very gun, and going from the factory issue compact two finger "boot" grips to full sized padded three-finger grips improves the PERCEIVED recoil immensely.

    The factory issue grips are GREAT for concealment, but the fact that your pinky is left flapping in the breeze makes for a potentially uncomfortable and weak grip. You really need to squeeze down with your WHOLE hand to get a nice good solid grip, plus the extra surface area of the larger grip spreads out the recoil over a larger part of the shooting hand, meaning less "slap".

    Swapping to an all rubber full hand grip (eg like the Hogue or Pachmayer) makes a BIG difference; its like night and day.

    The only drawback is that these bigger grips can compromise concealability. In a purse, I doubt this will matter, but the larger grips make carry in many pockets impossible.

    Stock "boot" grip (edit: the Smith stock boot grip is made by Uncle Mikes).
    smith_642.jpg

    Three finger-type grip (this one is a closed backstrap Hogue):
    60000L.jpg
  • FGColonelFGColonel Member Posts: 18 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thank you Gentlemen. Lots of great suggestions. I had thought about the wadcutters and purchased a box today. Concealment is not a big issue since it is a purse carry so I may try different grips also. Magnaporting may be an idea too. She says the gun is ok the way it is, but I see her not practicing with it the way she does with the other guns and to be honest I think this gun requires MORE practice. If after the changes, she still shows negative reactions. I will probably take the little gun for my use (I love it) and find her something she is more comfortable firing. Again, thanks for the suggestions guys.
    One other quick thing. A friend of hers carries a .32 revolver. It is S&W 432 I think, not really sure. The wife likes the look and feel of this gun but has never fired it. What is you opinions of this gun, or any .32 for that matter as a carry gun?
  • nmyersnmyers Member Posts: 16,892 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The only .32 S&W now makes is the .327 mag --- a nice gun but the same problems your wife now has with the .38.

    Wadcutters in the gun she now has will not only be pleasant to shoot, the larger mass of a .38 delivers more energy to the target by staying IN the target. The 1st generation of US Air Marshal's used the .38 WC for exactly this reason.

    The only thing I would suggest besides WC's & a larger rubber grip is a set of Woolf springs; it's possible that the heavy trigger pull is a contributing factor to her dislike of this gun.

    Neal
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Fred Dodd
    Magnaporting may be an idea too.

    Personally, I wouldn't. IMO porting is best left to competition type guns that are being shot in good light and can receive high maintenance.

    Yes, this will reduce muzzle flip, but besides being expensive, magnaporting increases both muzzle flash and noise.

    Both of these things already contribute to the perceived unpleasantness of firing a .38 snubnose.

    Increased flash in particular could be a problem with a defensive gun in a low light situation.


    quote:
    What is you opinions of this gun [Smith 432], or any .32 for that matter as a carry gun?
    Edit: Sorry Smtih 432 is in .32 H&R magnum (not .32 long). I had .32 long on the brain from that last post from Polite Psycho.

    IMO .32 long is obsolete for self defense nowadays. If that's all I had, I'd use it, but there are better choices out there in my opinion, even for recoil-sensitive shooters.

    The .32 H&R magnum round is ballistically similar to .380 ACP in that it fires a relatively light bullet at high velocity.

    You can duplicate these ballistics using the .38 special with light weight bullets, plus then you get the flexibility to use the heavier loads *if you want to*.

    Personally, If I'm going to be carrying a gun the SIZE of a .38, I'd want the ability to have that power, if necessary.

    Only real advantage of the .32 is the ability to hold one more round in a similarly sized gun. But again I'd still rather have 5 .38+Ps than 6 .32s.

    Two significant disadvantages of this round are that it can be considerably harder to find than ordinary .38 special, and if you do find it, its going to cost quite a bit more money. More cost = less practice per dollar.
  • TxsTxs Member Posts: 17,809 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In this situation, lighter ammunition and grip design are the factors you're left with.

    In factory ammunition, those full wadcutters are your best move.

    When it comes to grips, the more hand filling they are the more any recoil forces will be spread out in the hand.

    The best grip option for taming felt recoil is a wider, soft rubber grip that covers the rear of the grip frame - as shown in beantownshootah's second pic. The thicker and broader this layer of rubber between the web of the hand and the wide/flat upper portion of the grip frame the better.
  • partisanpartisan Member Posts: 6,414
    edited November -1
    Fred, I think you and your wife have made a good decision on a carry pistol for her. My wife went through about 4 guns before she settled on an airweight. She feels comfortable with the simplicity. She loves her S&W model 66, so she isn't too intimidated with recoil. Keep her shooting the airweight and she'll get more use to the recoil. This is one of those times that no gun is going to be 100% perfect.
  • texas gunplumbertexas gunplumber Member Posts: 26 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by beantownshootah
    quote:Originally posted by Fred Dodd
    Magnaporting may be an idea too.

    Personally, I wouldn't. IMO porting is best left to competition type guns that are being shot in good light and can receive high maintenance.

    Yes, this will reduce muzzle flip, but besides being expensive, magnaporting increases both muzzle flash and noise.

    Both of these things already contribute to the perceived unpleasantness of firing a .38 snubnose.

    Increased flash in particular could be a problem with a defensive gun in a low light situation.


    quote:
    What is you opinions of this gun [Smith 432], or any .32 for that matter as a carry gun?
    Edit: Sorry Smtih 432 is in .32 H&R magnum (not .32 long). I had .32 long on the brain from that last post from Polite Psycho.

    IMO .32 long is obsolete for self defense nowadays. If that's all I had, I'd use it, but there are better choices out there in my opinion, even for recoil-sensitive shooters.

    The .32 H&R magnum round is ballistically similar to .380 ACP in that it fires a relatively light bullet at high velocity.

    You can duplicate these ballistics using the .38 special with light weight bullets, plus then you get the flexibility to use the heavier loads *if you want to*.

    Personally, If I'm going to be carrying a gun the SIZE of a .38, I'd want the ability to have that power, if necessary.

    Only real advantage of the .32 is the ability to hold one more round in a similarly sized gun. But again I'd still rather have 5 .38+Ps than 6 .32s.

    Two significant disadvantages of this round are that it can be considerably harder to find than ordinary .38 special, and if you do find it, its going to cost quite a bit more money. More cost = less practice per dollar.



    I VOTE FOR A 110gr hollow point in .38 spec....a stopper with low recoil
  • ruger41ruger41 Member Posts: 14,665 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    FG I carry a similar gun(taurus 850) and for practice you simply can't beat the 148 grain full wadcutter. My wife LOVES shooting the gun with that round as do I. I do make sure we put a few heavier defense loads in just for practice but in a defense situation I doubt the recoil will be as big a factor for her if you just stick with standard pressure loads. Hornady has a new non +p 110 grain load out that looks very good--I currently carry Hornady 140 grain XTP's and they are not brutal in the recoil dept. Now if I shoot Buffalo Bore's 158 grain load I will be needing advil by the end of the day as those are brutal out of a snubby. If your gun doesn't have them already I'd also suggest a set of Pachmayer compac grips. Some folks do carry 148 grain full wadcutters for defense as they cut a nice clean hole and crush bone-Buffalo Bore offers a standard pressure defense version of this round but I have not tried it out yet so I'm not sure of its' recoil.
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    Federal has designed a strictly self defense .38 that strangely is only a standard loaded but delivers the same power of a +P. This of course means less recoil and less muzzle flash and less loud report when fired.

    But all in all, I say practice with the weakest, lightest .38 you can find. And then carry a .38 round that is evidenced to be more of a man-stopper. Reason being that if even a weak, small woman is attacked, during that attack she will have so much adrenline pumping that she will not notice even if she was shooting a .44 magnum in an effort to stop her attacker.
Sign In or Register to comment.