In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Remington Arms Co Cal 7mm rolling block

jmecheruljmecherul Member Posts: 84 ✭✭
edited February 2008 in Ask the Experts
hi
I have a Remington Cal 7mm rolling block patented oct22 1902 or 1901. there are no serial numbers or other markings looking around this might be model 1897 i am not sure. anybody with any ideas if i am right and how much it would cost? it is in very good condition. any help is appreciated. thanks

jmecherul

Comments

  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I believe the difference between the 1897 & 1902, Model 5's RB's., is that the 1902 has a ejector. Chances are that is what you have, with that patent date.

    Without photos it's hard to estimate value?
  • jmecheruljmecherul Member Posts: 84 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Here are some pictures
    [img][/img]2006334144954121853_th.jpg
    [img][/img]2006346895503878135_th.jpg
    [img][/img]2006315349726007024_th.jpg
    [img][/img]2006308889378881174_th.jpg

    jmecherul
  • jmecheruljmecherul Member Posts: 84 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Bad pictures here are bigger ones
    2006334144954121853_rs.jpg
    2006346895503878135_th.jpg
    2006315349726007024_th.jpg
    2006308889378881174_th.jpg

    Jmecherul
  • bgjohnbgjohn Member Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Now they are too big.
    JM
  • jmecheruljmecherul Member Posts: 84 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    here are the pics hopefully i got them right this time

    2578667450102804856S500x500Q85.jpg

    2044152680102804856S500x500Q85.jpg

    2225251970102804856S500x500Q85.jpg

    2977285650102804856S500x500Q85.jpg

    please let me know if this is a Model 5 rolling block and sort of how much might be worth. thanks

    jmecherul
  • jmecheruljmecherul Member Posts: 84 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    hi

    does anybody have an opinion? thanks

    jmecherul
  • rufe-snowrufe-snow Member Posts: 18,650 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by jmecherul
    hi

    does anybody have an opinion? thanks

    jmecherul



    It appears to be factory original, and in very good external condition, ( the rifling condition in the bore would also be a factor in it's value ). The nice ones like yours have pretty much dried up over the years. Most that you run across, have come up from south of the border, and show years of use and abuse. My WAG is that it would be in $500 to $1000, range.
  • tugtug Member Posts: 16 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    If it's in 7mm, it's likely a # 5. A pretty good test is that the # 1's (the black powder/cast iron ones) had sliding extractors, while the # 5's (the smokeless powder ones) had rotary extractors (they revolved about the same pin as the breechblock), but apparently some early # 5' were made w sliding extractors, so this is not an absolute test. A minor addition to the confusion is that there is disagreement as to whether the # 1's were ever made in 7mm, but authoritative sources claim that a few were during the transition from bp to smokeless.
  • nononsensenononsense Member Posts: 10,928 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Bad pictures here are bigger ones
    2006334144954121853_rs.jpg
    2006346895503878135_rs.jpg
    2006315349726007024_rs.jpg
    2006308889378881174_rs.jpg

    Jmecherul


    Let's try it this way.
  • tugtug Member Posts: 16 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    OOPS! missed the patent date. # 1's ceased production in about 1897 (a few were made after that, but not many). It seems that all 1902 patent date pieces were steel (smokeless powder).

    As an additional note: One source (from the Oct 1959 National Rifleman, I think) said that these were chambered for an earlier 7mm Mauser round than the current commercial one (longer head-to-shoulder length), but the 2 we've had both shot/shoot commercial ammo just fine.
Sign In or Register to comment.