In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

M16/AR15 Question Part 2

bnocentibnocenti Member Posts: 58 ✭✭
edited July 2012 in Ask the Experts
"The term "AR-15" is copyrighted by Colt Industries. No other manufacturer may legally call his version an "AR-15". Colt discontinued most AR-15 models > 20 years ago due to legal & social reasons.

Other manufacturers really make what we call "AR-type" or "AR-clone" rifles.

Since you want to invest > $20,000 in a rifle, I think that you are right in wanting a factory Colt, as opposed to a conversion by a machine shop. Can you tell us what form it is registered on?

Neal"

Hello Neal,

This weapon would need to be on a Form 4 I believe. Since it's not a registered dewat. If it were a registered dewat it would be on a Form 5

Comments

  • Options
    dcs shootersdcs shooters Member Posts: 10,969
    edited November -1
    In beantown,s answer, he said that you can't use a m16 BCG in a AR [xx(]
    That is wrong as some manufactures are shipping their AR,s with m16 carriers. I have a Bushmaster that is about 20yrs old tha came with one new, and a DPMS with one also [;)]
    It's OK with ATF as long as that is the only part.
  • Options
    cpermdcpermd Member Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    An M16 for us mortals will be on a Form 3 or 4.
    Once bought it will be on a 4.

    CP
  • Options
    bnocentibnocenti Member Posts: 58 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by cpermd
    An M16 for us mortals will be on a Form 3 or 4.
    Once bought it will be on a 4.

    CP


    You are correct CP I was answering the question as if I were the one doing the paperwork I should have been more specific. These can be obtained on a Form 3 as well.
  • Options
    JuggernautJuggernaut Member Posts: 719 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Another point is that technically all AR15-Armalite Rifles are clones even from Colt being that the only true AR15 is an Armalite Rifle model 15 even though Colt bought/stole the design and name from the AR15 designer Eugene Stoner. However legally Colt owns the rights to the 'AR15' now and as stated no one else can use that particular name. And contrary to popular belief the AR15 has never been used by the u.s. military which has only used the M16>M4 rifle which is the u.s. military designation for the rifle as per DARPA(Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency).

    Batf no longer considers having an M16 BCG in an AR to be an attempt to illegally convert an AR to full auto. However in the past, batf did apparently consider that having an M16 BCG could possibly be an attempt to make an AR full auto illegally.
    Also here is a comparison for reference.....
    boltCarrier.gif
  • Options
    beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dcs shooters
    In beantown,s answer, he said that you can't use a m16 BCG in a AR [xx(]
    Where did THAT come from? I said no such thing. Here is my direct quote:

    quote:http://forums.gunbroker.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=567114
    beantownshootah Advanced Member
    USA 11867 Posts
    Posted - 07/26/2012 : 4:24:02 PM

    Can you put an AR-15 upper on an M16 lower?

    Yes. . .but.

    I believe the M16 bolt carrier group is a little different and that difference may prevent your AR-15 upper from firing as "quickly" as you might like, if you catch my drift.
    In other words, I said the bolt carrier group was different between the two, and if you just stick a random AR-15 upper on top of an M16 lower, you might not be able to fire full auto.

    I never mentioned the possibility of putting an M16 full auto style BCG into a regular semi-auto AR-15 since that's not what the question was about!

    Now to address THAT issue, yes I'm aware that historically some AR-15 *STYLE* guns have shipped out with the full-auto bolt carrier groups, but I don't think that's the norm; most (if not all) of them do NOT nowadays.

    If your particular AR-15 has one, then yes, you could stick it on top of an M16 lower and be "good to go". If not, these full auto bolt carrier groups are readily available and not terribly expensive, so you can always buy one.

    On legality, basically you're allowed to own these parts, and you're even allowed to stick them in AR-15 guns:

    quote:Written by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), Chief of the Firearms Technology Branch
    ...M16 bolt carriers are not designed and intended solely and exclusively for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun and are not any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled. Further, an M16 bolt carrier is not a firearm as defined in the GCA or a machinegun as defined in the NFA. An M16 bolt carrier is simply a machinegun part and as such its domestic sale and possession is unregulated under the Federal firearms laws. It is not unlawful to utilize a M16 machinegun bolt carrier in a semiautomatic AR15 type rifle.

    Owning one of these would be illegal *IF* its owned in conjunction with other parts necessary to construct an illegal machinegun (eg full auto style lower with autosear, even if unassembled, etc).
  • Options
    TxsTxs Member Posts: 18,801
    edited November -1
    The truth is that AR15 and M16 are the same rifle, with the M-prefix only indicating a US military designation for various models.

    AR15 is actually Colt's designation for a type of rifle, not a model. Instead, individual numbers are assigned AR15 models with various features.

    Despite what many think, 'AR15' doesn't necessarily indicate a rifle is semiauto only. You'll see this clearly demonstrated if you examine any US miltary variant of this rifle. They're all marked with the exact same AR15 logo as Colt's non-US military variants, with further markings (M16, M16A1 thru A4, M4, etc.) indicating which Colt model it actually is.

    For example, the US Air Force first adopted the select fire version of Colt's semiauto AR15 Model R6000, the Model 602, and it received the US military designation of M16. The US Army later adopted Colt's select fire AR15 Model 603 and it was designated M16A1. Today's issue carbine model, the M4, is a Colt AR15 Model R0921.

    If you're looking for a non-NFA 'M16', Colt's current Model 6920 is nothing more than a semiauto US military M4 that's fitted with a 16 in. barrel instead of a 14.5 in. tube.

    EDIT:
    quote:Originally posted by Juggernaut
    Not according to the military or DARPA, it is the M16 or M4 with several other variants and not an AR15, perhaps in the airforce or navy or something I wouldn't know.You may not recall, but no matter what branch of the US military you were in your M16 variant had Colt's AR15 logo on the left side of the magazine well. The DoD assigned designation for whatever AR15 model it was would be stamped down below this in block lettering.

    If you ever carried a US military M16 variant it was in fact a Colt AR15 with a DoD assigned M-prefix number which translated to it's specific model.
  • Options
    JuggernautJuggernaut Member Posts: 719 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Not according to the military or DARPA, it is the M16 or M4 with several other variants and not an AR15, perhaps in the airforce or navy or something I wouldn't know. I was only in combat mos's in the Army and Marines and they are not the same rifles as there are several modifications making them completely different from the civilian versions. Regardless all other 'AR15' types including Colt and FN are cloned from the original design ArmaLite model 15, the original AR15.

    Regards
  • Options
    tsr1965tsr1965 Member Posts: 8,682 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Is it true, that the M4 was not actually devoloped by Colt, that it was actually developed by FN, when Colt lost the contract for a period of time?

    Best
  • Options
    nmyersnmyers Member Posts: 16,880 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    No, the M4 was developed by Colt for Abu Dhabi in 1986. It was adopted by the US Army a couple of years later.

    Neal
  • Options
    JuggernautJuggernaut Member Posts: 719 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Txs
    The truth is that AR15 and M16 are the same rifle, with the M-prefix only indicating a US military designation for various models.

    AR15 is actually Colt's designation for a type of rifle, not a model. Instead, individual numbers are assigned AR15 models with various features.

    Despite what many think, 'AR15' doesn't necessarily indicate a rifle is semiauto only. You'll see this clearly demonstrated if you examine any US miltary variant of this rifle. They're all marked with the exact same AR15 logo as Colt's non-US military variants, with further markings (M16, M16A1 thru A4, M4, etc.) indicating which Colt model it actually is.

    For example, the US Air Force first adopted the select fire version of Colt's semiauto AR15 Model R6000, the Model 602, and it received the US military designation of M16. The US Army later adopted Colt's select fire AR15 Model 603 and it was designated M16A1. Today's issue carbine model, the M4, is a Colt AR15 Model R0921.

    If you're looking for a non-NFA 'M16', Colt's current Model 6920 is nothing more than a semiauto US military M4 that's fitted with a 16 in. barrel instead of a 14.5 in. tube.

    EDIT:
    quote:Originally posted by Juggernaut
    Not according to the military or DARPA, it is the M16 or M4 with several other variants and not an AR15, perhaps in the airforce or navy or something I wouldn't know.
    You may not recall, but no matter what branch of the US military you were in your M16 variant had Colt's AR15 logo on the left side of the magazine well. The DoD assigned designation for whatever AR15 model it was would be stamped down below this in block lettering.

    If you ever carried a US military M16 variant it was in fact a Colt AR15 with a DoD assigned M-prefix number which translated to it's specific model.


    No, that is incorrect and I recall just fine thanks and apparently the military branch actually does matter in relation to combat branches such as the Army and Marines. Maybe not so for the airforce and navy who may get civilian type ar15's or something like I said I wouldn't know about them.

    I have worked for DARPA and there were no Colt or FN 'AR15' marked military rifles issued in the Army or Marine units that I was in, only 'M16' and 'M4' designated rifles by Colt and FN.

    Regards
Sign In or Register to comment.