In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Here we go again

Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,476 ✭✭✭✭
edited May 2019 in General Discussion
Trump, Schumer and Pelosi just agreed upon spending $ 2 trillion.

They are going to meet later to decide what to spend it on.

The swamp lives.
Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

Brad Steele

Comments

  • Options
    hillbillehillbille Member Posts: 14,170 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    maybe it should go to shovel ready plans, if pelosi and shmuck agree, then Trump can use it for his wall....... that would give them both strokes
  • Options
    mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I heard that and about had a cow.

    Same ole crap, divert the money come to trough to get more.

    What the heck, it's only 10% :roll:
  • Options
    Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,275 ******
    edited November -1
    The financial apocalypse is going to be a doozy when it hits.
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Options
    WearyTravelerWearyTraveler Member Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I've ZERO faith in our government...
    ”People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
    - GEORGE ORWELL -
  • Options
    GilWilson1GilWilson1 Member Posts: 182
    edited November -1
    I guess we are bound and determined to destroy this country.
  • Options
    Sam06Sam06 Member Posts: 21,254 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    DJT should have kicked them out of the office.

    He is falling for the old (R) weakness of mollifying the libtards, bad move IMO.
    RLTW

  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dems are trying to get an infrastructure bill thru.
  • Options
    Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    GilWilson1 wrote:
    I guess we are bound and determined to destroy this country.
    It certainly appears that way, and the end is not that far away.
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • Options
    Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,476 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dems are trying to get an infrastructure bill thru.

    Trump is as much a part of this problem as are the Dems.

    Just as Reagan did with O'Neil, Trump is attempting to purchase bi-partisanship.

    If this kind of crap takes hold, eventually, just as Reagan did, Trump, if he gains a second term, could increase the national debt by the greatest percentage of any President in the modern era.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Options
    mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,297 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Not sure how we pay for it but the roads are a MESS, around here the interstate and local roads are missing chunks of pavement and someone is going to have to eventually fix them or we will need 4 wheel drive/Horse to travel.

    So how do you pay for that without spending 2 trillion dollars?

    Lots of companies are using those roads to deliver goods so maybe they can help pony up LOL
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dems are trying to get an infrastructure bill thru.

    Trump is as much a part of this problem as are the Dems.

    Just as Reagan did with O'Neil, Trump is attempting to purchase bi-partisanship.

    If this kind of crap takes hold, eventually, just as Reagan did, Trump, if he gains a second term, could increase the national debt by the greatest percentage of any President in the modern era.

    Really? Trump had that plan in his opening speech .
  • Options
    ProceramicProceramic Member Posts: 334
    edited November -1
  • Options
    jimdeerejimdeere Member, Moderator Posts: 25,653 ******
    edited November -1
    The Liberals would want to build a bullet train from Central America to Texas with the money.
  • Options
    Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,476 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dems are trying to get an infrastructure bill thru.

    Trump is as much a part of this problem as are the Dems.

    Just as Reagan did with O'Neil, Trump is attempting to purchase bi-partisanship.

    If this kind of crap takes hold, eventually, just as Reagan did, Trump, if he gains a second term, could increase the national debt by the greatest percentage of any President in the modern era.

    Really? Trump had that plan in his opening speech .

    What plan? Increasing the national debt by historic levels?

    Is that really a plan?
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Options
    Missouri Mule K30Missouri Mule K30 Member Posts: 2,092 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Even now if we froze all spending but pay current bills how long could it take to pay off debt?

    The Prez tried the freeze out and turned around and paid off the furloughed tenured employees. When I do not work I get no pay. I find another gig, and move on.

    But alas I had forgotten the poor migrant who tunnels their way under the wall needs to be fed and clothed, sheltered.

    You know one thing that the Soviet Union did well was Guard the Berlin Wall. :lol:
  • Options
    Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,275 ******
    edited November -1
    Looks like Trump has 80's inflation and dollar devaluation in the plan. Stagflation... tastes like chicken.
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Options
    chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    So what.

    When Obama DOUBLED the national debt and created the wasteful porkuous package, crickets chirped.
  • Options
    ruger41ruger41 Member Posts: 14,647 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I don?t even know why they bother telling us anymore. That debt amount will NEVER be paid off, not even 10% of it. Just keep on printing money out of thin air and keep talking about how they have to fix the deficit and the debt and have shovel ready jobs every 4 years and the voters will just keep voting in the same ole crappy politicians on both sides as they always have. We eventually will have another Depression that?ll make the one from the 1930?s look like Kindergarten. Maybe it?s just better to vote in the most Socialist aholes we can and sit back and watch it burn to the ground and then start over.
  • Options
    Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,275 ******
    edited November -1
    chiefr wrote:
    So what.

    When Obama DOUBLED the national debt and created the wasteful porkuous package, crickets chirped.

    Crickets? None so boisterous as we here on this forum over that.
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Options
    Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,476 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    chiefr wrote:
    So what.

    When Obama DOUBLED the national debt and created the wasteful porkuous package, crickets chirped.

    He was roundly criticized for it.

    As was Reagan when he almost TRIPLED the national debt.

    Somehow we are supposed to believe that a Trump/Schumer/Pelosi porkulous is going to be better than the Obama version?

    It is all irresponsible, particularly when they pull a number out of their butts and then go about looking for ways to spend it.

    And pay for it. Yeah, they stated that needed to find a way to pay for it.... :roll:
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Options
    mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Time for a constitutional amendment. Balanced budget or firing squad for all elected who fail or obstruct the balanced budget, WITHOUT raising tax rates. I don't get a pay raise because I bought some frivolous items.
  • Options
    Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,275 ******
    edited November -1
    mag00 wrote:
    Time for a constitutional amendment. Balanced budget or firing squad for all elected who fail or obstruct the balanced budget, WITHOUT raising tax rates. I don't get a pay raise because I bought some frivolous items.

    I don't know how we would ever get a balanced budget amendment ratified these days. Not that it would matter much anyway. Whose numbers would anyone believe that it was, in fact, balanced?

    I always think of that movie "Dave" where they had a lookalike stand in for a sick president, and he called up his tax accountant buddy to help balance the books and he began vetoing line items like money doled out to consumers to make them feel good for their domestic auto purchase.

    I recall presidential candidate McCain getting hammered for his debate comments about wanting to take a hatchet to the budget (not that I ever believed he would do it)... it's so necessary it's not funny tho.
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Options
    Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,897 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    chiefr wrote:
    So what.

    When Obama DOUBLED the national debt and created the wasteful porkuous package, crickets chirped.
    Really,......."So what?"
    This is a perfect example of falling for a cult of personality, and losing control of one's mental faculties in the process.

    Good God man, do you not understand we do NOT have the money to do this with,....NO MATTER WHO DOES IT????

    WOW,...Simply amazing!!!
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • Options
    WearyTravelerWearyTraveler Member Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    They're spending money like drunken sailors on liberty in PI! Damn - how about some fiscal responsibility!
    ”People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
    - GEORGE ORWELL -
  • Options
    mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    mag00 wrote:
    Time for a constitutional amendment. Balanced budget or firing squad for all elected who fail or obstruct the balanced budget, WITHOUT raising tax rates. I don't get a pay raise because I bought some frivolous items.

    I don't know how we would ever get a balanced budget amendment ratified these days. Not that it would matter much anyway. Whose numbers would anyone believe that it was, in fact, balanced?

    I always think of that movie "Dave" where they had a lookalike stand in for a sick president, and he called up his tax accountant buddy to help balance the books and he began vetoing line items like money doled out to consumers to make them feel good for their domestic auto purchase.

    I recall presidential candidate McCain getting hammered for his debate comments about wanting to take a hatchet to the budget (not that I ever believed he would do it)... it's so necessary it's not funny tho.

    One concept I heard was along the lines of having enough cash to make the transactions of day to day commerce.

    If only 6 chickens exist for trade currency, and 10 transactions in 10 locations needed to be done, there were just not enough chickens to represent the commerce needed at the time.

    I know it sounds a bit corny, lol, but there may be some truth to it. So now we have virtual money, or basically just a tracking system for the work we do. I like to barter, but other times the person does not have what I want, so how would I bank my "credits" without the tracking system.

    That is what I suspect is the reason the money handlers don't care about deficit or debt, they make a cut of it all.

    I will be willing to bet that in the future, inheritance on the positive side of the balance sheet will become scarce. The new generations only know debt and will die with debt.
  • Options
    spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 37,724 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    they have to figure out how to get their share out without annoying the sucker taxpayers......
  • Options
    JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,176 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Big debt is a powerful tool and can be used in many different ways (some good...some bad) to control the actions of others, even Trump knows that by his actions in his personal life ;) he's even stated publicly that he likes debt. We have no worries, let it be the creditors worry :D

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • Options
    Smitty500magSmitty500mag Member Posts: 13,603 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think some people here would rather have hillary in office so she could have continued obama's spending which would have added another 17 to 20 trillion to the national debt by now.
  • Options
    Quick&DeadQuick&Dead Member Posts: 1,466 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Trump, Schumer and Pelosi just agreed upon spending $ 2 trillion.

    They are going to meet later to decide what to spend it on.

    The swamp lives.

    A TENTATIVE agreement to repair the infrastructure in the USA.

    Far better than spending $$ overseas to countries that don't like us OTHER than for the $$$ we GIVE them.

    Congress holds the purse strings so neither Trump, Pelosi nor Schumer can spend a penny w/o congressional funding approval.

    Trump is a shrewd business person with cost/benefit and fiscal responsibility experience so I will wait and see what the outcome of their further meeting in a few weeks produces for presentation to Congress for funding.

    UNTIL THEN, no point in getting ones' panties in a wad.

    :lol:
    The government has no rights. Only the people have rights which empowers the government.
    We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
    Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.

    I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:
  • Options
    chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 13,779 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    chiefr wrote:
    So what.

    When Obama DOUBLED the national debt and created the wasteful porkuous package, crickets chirped.

    He was roundly criticized for it.

    As was Reagan when he almost TRIPLED the national debt.

    Somehow we are supposed to believe that a Trump/Schumer/Pelosi porkulous is going to be better than the Obama version?

    It is all irresponsible, particularly when they pull a number out of their butts and then go about looking for ways to spend it.

    And pay for it. Yeah, they stated that needed to find a way to pay for it.... :roll:




    Several points.
    I served under the peanut farmer and later Reagan. You have to go back before WWI to compare how weak and unprepared our national defense was. An all volunteer force, no draft and draft wages. Morale sucked and our GIs were bailing. Reagan fixed that and at the same time he fixed the cold war. For most of us, at least those who cared about national defense saw something tangible from Reagans spending.

    Obama stimulus package was nothing more than welfare, both corporate and individual. He was lauded by the media, especially for the "Making work pay credit". Little if any of the money went to infrastructure. Conversely Trump is being dammed by the same people in the media whom praised Obama for doing the same thing.

    Could not agree more with you on the debt. I too am pissed about it, however no one in Washington gives a crap about debt anymore: Both parties.
    The only difference is how or where they spend the money.

    I seriously doubt our national debt will ever be a concern for a 100 years into the future. If so the debt problem would have been fixed years ago.
    Looking at the debt problem in a relative sense, I predict the only solution will be.....at lease for debt incurred by the US Government will be absolution and forgiveness.
Sign In or Register to comment.