In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Does this news story make sense?

WarbirdsWarbirds Member Posts: 16,923 ✭✭✭✭

Guy reloading who had “at least 6lbs of smokeless powder” blew his house up.

Wouldn’t smokeless powder burn, not explode, let alone 6lbs of powder level this guys house?



Comments

  • AdamsQuailHunterAdamsQuailHunter Member Posts: 2,022 ✭✭✭✭

    Not believing that 6 pounds of smokeless powder did that to the house - Best Regards - AQH

  • cbxjeffcbxjeff Member Posts: 17,601 ✭✭✭✭

    Perhaps the term "at least" is pertinent here.

    It's too late for me, save yourself.
  • Ditch-RunnerDitch-Runner Member Posts: 25,239 ✭✭✭✭

    maybe 6 pounds of high explosives ? just a guess I have no idea on what it would take to do it but I do not think 6 pounds of smokeless powder would have caused that good news at least there both alive .

    but WTH if the cops and insurance company go along so be it

  • discusdaddiscusdad Member Posts: 11,427 ✭✭✭✭

    or he had a propane gas leak that went undetected for hours prior to the BP touching off.

  • pingjockeypingjockey Member Posts: 1,879 ✭✭✭✭

    6 lb. could pack a wallop but not in the container it comes in.

  • BobJudyBobJudy Member Posts: 6,634 ✭✭✭✭

    Typical media reporting. If you read the article it did not say the reloading or the smokeless powder caused the explosion. If he had set off something with that big of a bang while reloading I doubt if he would have been around to tell the responders what happened. It is also odd there isn't evidence of fire like you would expect with an uncontained smokeless powder or gas explosion. It looks like the damage shown when Mythbusters blew up a hot water heater. Bob

  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,452 ✭✭✭✭

    You don't have to wear your glasses when reloading... But it Helps.

  • chollagardenschollagardens Member Posts: 4,614 ✭✭✭

    Three motives to lie.

    1. Easier to deal with the Insurance company.
    2. Avoid problems with the law because the amount was more than 6 lbs.
    3. A new effort to curtail gun ownership by exaggerating the possible harm of smokeless powder.
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,381 ******

    Looks like the explosion happened in a front room of the house. That alone seems suspect.

    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,452 ✭✭✭✭

    News interviewing a couple of neighbors... Well Jerome what did you see? I heared a loud boom like whats goes on in Chicago about every day.

    How about it Langley.. who lives 4 blocks away... well it sounded like a space shuttle launch.. didn't know one was going up today.

  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,286 ✭✭✭✭

    One word comes to mind........Cartel.

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • jkbt1jkbt1 Member Posts: 223 ✭✭✭

    Sounds like a lie to try and cover something else up.

  • Butchdog2Butchdog2 Member Posts: 3,834 ✭✭✭✭
  • Texas1911DETexas1911DE Member Posts: 684 ✭✭✭✭


    ...Looks like heck of a lot of damage from 6lbs of smokeless powder, but then Ive not exploded 6lbs of powder in my house..


    "Looks like the explosion happened in a front room of the house. That alone seems suspect."

    ...??? Really? Maybe he doesnt have a "designated" reloading bunker...I have my gun bench, couple of safes, and do everything gun related in my middle front bedroom, which of course is at the front of my home...

  • chmechme Member Posts: 1,472 ✭✭✭✭

    No. Six lbs of Tannerite- maybe.

  • pulsarncpulsarnc Member Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭✭

    Looks more like a meth lab explosion to me . Contrary to popular belief they don't all catch fire .

    cry Havoc and let slip  the dogs of war..... 
  • dunbarboyzdunbarboyz Member Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭✭

    Did it blow up twice? Most of the roof is there then it is gone.

  • MobuckMobuck Member Posts: 14,088 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2021

    "UNCONTAINED" ignition of smokeless reloading powder does not result in an explosion (that's the reason for the thin metal/plastic containers and the storage recommendations). One heck of a fire but not a destructive explosion as shown in the pic. Tannerite or BP does explode.

  • Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,440 ✭✭✭✭

    The "reloading ammo" and "6# of smokeless powder" may or may not have a thing to do with the blast. He could also have been "watching TV" or "on the toilet" when it occurred, but neither would be causative. Likewise the powder could just as well have been "6# pounds of cat litter" in the house. No cause and effect relationship necessarily arises.

    The disappearing roof is a product of camera angles, In my opinion. The tree blocks the view of the remaining roof in the top photo. That shot was also taken from much closer in, which also masks view of the roof.

    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Sam06Sam06 Member Posts: 21,244 ✭✭✭✭

    No, it doesn't make sense. Smokeless powder would have burned.

    RLTW

  • kannoneerkannoneer Member Posts: 3,395 ✭✭✭✭

    Six pounds of any type of gunpowder will produce a respectable blast if tightly packed into a steel pipe with endcaps welded on. Of course, welding will detonate the powder.......Did this guy have a welder, by any chance?

  • Wild TurkeyWild Turkey Member Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭✭

    First question that comes up in this old news reporter's mind is how did he survive?

    If he was reloading he would have been close to the powder and probably would have suffered severe injuries.

    Next question is was it a "high velocity" or "low velocity" explosion? Low velocity --like AMFO-- is a push which would bend the fence. High velocity --like a gas leak-- is a shattering force which would break all the windows nearby but leave lots of debris close to where it originally was. Either way it wasn't a big boom.

    'Nother question from a non-reloader: why SIX pounds? Doesn't powder come in one and eight pound cans? Or was the six an estimate on how much was left in can?

    Some good questions here -- bet we'll never hear the answers.😏

  • truthfultruthful Member Posts: 2,117 ✭✭✭✭

    Depends on how the smokeless was being stored. If in the original plastic bottles sitting on an open table or shelf, it will pretty much just burn rapidly, likely causing a significant housefire but no blast. However, if the 6 pounds was tightly confined in a rigid container, then BOOM! Think of an artillery shell going off.

  • grdad45grdad45 Member Posts: 5,377 ✭✭✭✭
    edited October 2021

    My Daughter was helping her employer, an insurance company, with insuring a semi trailer of "gunpowder". She called me to ask about it. I asked her if it was smokeless powder or black powder, explaining that one is considered a flammable solid, the other an explosive, in that order. I told her I wouldn't insure a semi full of black powder without a LARGE cash up-front premium! Turned out to be smokeless, and properly labeled and escorted.

    Six pounds doesn't seem to be an extraordinary amount for an avid reloader, IMHO.

  • Rocky RaabRocky Raab Member Posts: 14,440 ✭✭✭✭

    Again, some of you are making the HUGE leap to the conclusion that his reloading was the cause of the blast. His wife was also in the house "doing something" but none of you leapt to the theory that whatever she was doing was the cause, did you?

    What he was doing may have been completely coincidental to the accident.

    I may be a bit crazy - but I didn't drive myself.
  • Wild TurkeyWild Turkey Member Posts: 2,425 ✭✭✭✭

    Posted this on another gun forum and got several interesting responses.

    A gunpowder explosion (home-made bomb type) would be a high velocity event and everything would be shattered and moved.

    However several readers noted that the damage was all in the upper part of the house, more consistent with a natural gas type explosion since NG is lighter than air and rises while butane/propane is heavier and settles so they were of the opinion that it was a NG type event.

Sign In or Register to comment.