In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

your guns may go bye bye

Mr GeeMr Gee Member Posts: 429 ✭✭✭
just received this.. true or not ?
U.S. reverses stance on treaty to regulate arms trade

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States reversed policy on Wednesday and said it would back launching talks on a treaty to regulate arms sales as long as the talks operated by consensus, a stance critics said gave every nation a veto.

The decision, announced in a statement released by the U.S. State Department, overturns the position of former President George W. Bush's administration, which had opposed such a treaty on the grounds that national controls were better.

On Wednesday Obama Took the First Major Step in a Plan to Ban All Firearms in the United States . The Obama administration intends to force gun control and a complete ban on all weapons for US citizens through the signing of international treaties with foreign nations. By signing international treaties on gun control, the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress. Once the US Government signs these international treaties, all US citizens will be subject to those gun laws created by foreign governments. These are laws that have been developed and promoted by organizations such as the United Nations and individuals such as George Soros and Michael Bloomberg. The laws are designed and intended to lead to the complete ban and confiscation of all firearms.

The Obama administration is attempting to use tactics and methods of gun control that will inflict major damage to our 2nd Amendment before US citizens even understand what has happened. Obama can appear before the public and tell them that he does not intend to pursue any legislation (in the United States) that will lead to new gun control laws, while cloaked in secrecy, his Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is committing the US to international treaties and foreign gun control laws. Does that mean Obama is telling the truth? What it means is that there will be no publicized gun control debates in the media or votes in Congress. We will wake up one morning and find that the United States has signed a treaty that prohibits firearm and ammunition manufacturers from selling to the public. We will wake up another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that prohibits any transfer of firearm ownership. And then, we will wake up yet another morning and find that the US has signed a treaty that requires US citizens to deliver any firearm they own to the local government collection and destruction center or face imprisonment.

This is not a joke nor a false warning. As sure as government health care will be forced on us by the Obama administration through whatever means necessary, so will gun control.

Please forward this message to others who may be concerned about the direction in which our country is headed.

We are being led like a lamb to the slaughter (Socialism/Dictator ship).
http://www.reuters. com/article/ politicsNews/ idUSTRE59E0Q9200 910

Comments

  • wpagewpage Member Posts: 10,204 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Could not access that article. However it will be interesting to see what happens with the current admin.
  • pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Mr Gee
    the Obama administration can use the US State Department to bypass the normal legislative process in Congress.
    President Clinton, while in office SIGNED the UN treaty. It was not ratified by Congress. Therefore it never became law. Same holds true today. If signed, it still has to be ratified.
  • brotus2brotus2 Member Posts: 178 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Frightening! If this happens, then at my age, by God, it will be out of my cold dead hands.
  • wsfiredudewsfiredude Member Posts: 7,769 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    your guns may go bye bye



    That would be interesting to see.

    Unless they all grow legs and walk off, they are not going anywhere.

    The only other way I could conceivably be separated from them would be for some individual or entity attempting to remove them from my possession. IMO, that would be akin to kidnapping and I would have no other choice than to maintain possession of them by force of arms.
  • reloader44magreloader44mag Member Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I legally own my all the firearms I have at this time...no one will be taking them away
  • TempestTempest Member Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • cccoopercccooper Member Posts: 4,044 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    A lot of folks believe that GUN CONFISCATION will be the begining of the end.

    There will be blood.
  • wpagewpage Member Posts: 10,204 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Only if they find them.
  • IdahoRedneckIdahoRedneck Member Posts: 2,699
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by wsfiredude
    your guns may go bye bye



    That would be interesting to see.

    Unless they all grow legs and walk off, they are not going anywhere.

    The only other way I could conceivably be separated from them would be for some individual or entity attempting to remove them from my possession. IMO, that would be akin to kidnapping and I would have no other choice than to maintain possession of them by force of arms.









    Yup...........+10000
  • lksmith03lksmith03 Member Posts: 1,742 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by IdahoRedneck
    quote:Originally posted by wsfiredude
    your guns may go bye bye



    That would be interesting to see.

    Unless they all grow legs and walk off, they are not going anywhere.

    The only other way I could conceivably be separated from them would be for some individual or entity attempting to remove them from my possession. IMO, that would be akin to kidnapping and I would have no other choice than to maintain possession of them by force of arms.









    Yup...........+10000

    and +100000 to that
  • llama girlllama girl Member Posts: 605 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have visited a lot of ANTI obama web sites these govt idiots do not understand that Civil War is coming if we are pushed too hard. Most of us remember the Constition when it was taught in school. I went to school on SAC Air Force Bases. Growing up on nuclear target bases, we were taught the Constition because we could have been the last generation to know and love it.
    Because we remember we are the last line against tyranny.UN troopers and obamas comin' we are on our own. Get ready kids lock and load, you know the rest.
    Register to vote.
    Got incumbits?
    Get a rope!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • tomahawktomahawk Member Posts: 11,826
    edited November -1
    eeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr...wrong[;)][:D] try it[;)]
  • chaoslodgechaoslodge Member Posts: 790 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This an agreement to negotiate a treaty. Once that treaty is negotiated it must be signed by the sitting president then, ratified by 2/3 of the Senate. There are lots of treaties. There have been several presidents sign some of them. There have been precious few ratified. Just ask a Native American how well that treaty system works.
Sign In or Register to comment.