In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options
Missouri AR 15 Bill
Chief Shaway
Member, Moderator Posts: 6,196 ******
[url][/url]https://www.kmov.com/news/missouri-lawmaker-introduces-bill-that-would-require-ar--ownership/article_e02841c6-4735-11e9-9a7f-eb0c0ffb8b3c.html
Looks like a good deal to me.
Looks like a good deal to me.
Comments
In reality, it's not much more than posturing but there's a message in there for the "namby pamby coasties"-- "this is not YOUR country, it's OUR country and some of us aren't ready to let you toss it away'.
My thoughts exactly.
A far more proactive approach to the gun/freedom hating DEMOCRATs that want to use their bully pulpit population centers to force their repressive laws and opinion on the rest of us.
I for one am really impressed with New Mexico's "Second Amendment sanctuary county" laws. No more tail wagging the dog like we see going on with West Coastal DEMOCRAT states.
they know it would never be passed ( wife and I were just talking about it )
same with the sanctuary cities and states claiming to not follow federal gun laws .. sure sure , just more BS
show me a dealer in one of those areas who will sell a firearm or machine gun , suppressor or any firearm governed by the federal boys to anyone with out the paperwork ,, than call me back
The Militia Act of 1792
No one in my family in that age group. IMHO, they'd get a much more effective class of shooters by going with 35 to 65 years old. We're too old to run so we have to stand and fight.
+35/65
Would only work for youngsters if there was an Iphone app that drops empty mags and cocks the gun.
:shock:
Looks like "stirring the pot" IMO.
1. If required, the state would have to buy/give them to residents.........or it would be no different than FORCED INSURANCE LIKE OBAMACARE.
2. I'm confident, not all residents of Missouri SHOULD have a firearm even if they can pass the NICS check.
3. No requirement to complete a firearm safety course?
:?:
We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.
I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:
How is posting a link to a pro-gun piece of legislation ?stirring the pot ??
So, you should have to complete a safety course to excercise your 2nd Amendment Right?
YOU GOT IT!
We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.
I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:
Some sort of 'safety instruction' would be beneficial considering the large number of air heads sucking oxygen these days.....even if it's 'this end is where the bullet comes out.'
We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.
I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:
That?s why I said, a good deal.
YMMV.
Stupid legislation, even if some mistakenly believe that it is 'pro-gun' does nothing positive and is nothing more than childish political posturing.
Similar to a President who claims 'We will never be a Socialist Country' while he attempts to strong-arm an auto manufacturer into keeping open plants that the company does not wish to keep open.
Brad Steele
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Many posters here who claim to be pro constitution/freedom/liberty are no better than the antis they so hate. They are only pro freedom as long as it's something THEY agree with. This becomes very evident when the legalize pot threads come up.
Better yet, ship those guns to Missouri so we can equip OUR MILITIA.
Sure, it's posturing but from a different perspective than the "left coast" anti-gun position.
Different does not mean better.
Were a similar law proposed by the leftists, I would only look at the stupidity of the premise and dismiss it.
Can you point to anything actually good about the proposed legislation?
Brad Steele
+1
The 2nd Amendment tells the GOVERNMENT what it can do and not do.
I don't want or need a group of politicians telling me what to own/carry/shoot.
"Any government big enough to give you everything you need, is big enough to take away everything
you have"
You must be referring to all the ones who want to limit freedom and support this horse hockey.
And fiery auto crashes
Some will die in hot pursuit
While sifting through my ashes
Some will fall in love with life
And drink it from a fountain
That is pouring like an avalanche
Coming down the mountain
Noticed that, too, didja?