In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Is there a red flag law in your state?

Quick&DeadQuick&Dead Member Posts: 1,466 ✭✭
edited April 2019 in General Discussion
That includes firearm owners in WA, OR, CA, IL, IN, NY, NJ, MD, FL, RI, VT, CT, DE, MA, and Colorado.

Here is a good common sense article.

C&P

How to Prepare For A Red Flag Confiscation Order At Your House
BY JOHN BOCH |APR 18, 2019

Last week, I shared a post by a former Alabama police officer-turned-lawyer turned prosecutor on how to react if police show up at your home with a red flag order. Just the thought of police showing up to take your guns stirred a lot of emotions in comments. Understandably so. But between the author?s recommendations and some in comments, prudent people can prepare.

Who needs to think about red flag confiscation orders? If you live in one of those states with red flag laws (WA, OR, CA, IL, IN, NY, NJ, MD, FL, RI, VT, CT, DE, MA), and now Colorado, cops could show up unannounced at your home with a court order to take your guns.


It couldn?t happen to you?

Don?t be a fool.

How is your home life with your significant other? Do you have any current or former disgruntled business partners or employers/employees? Have any issues with parents, children or other relatives? How do you get along with the in-laws? The neighbors? Co-workers? Ex-girlfriends/boyfriends? Had any bad Tinder (or Grindr) dates?

If you?re like most folks, you?ve angered someone at some point in your life who might file a complaint to get even. Especially if they know you embrace America?s gun culture.

Here in Illinois, just two weeks ago, someone approached me at a Guns Save Life meeting about his friend who was served with a red flag order a few days before. Seems the spousal unit went to the courthouse in a fit of anger one morning. Hours later, cops showed up to collect the other half?s guns.

Fortunately for the friend, he?d sensed the crazy brewing and had already taken his guns over to his sister?s house.

In this case, the gun owner was lucky and moved his guns out preemptively. While he thwarted his soon-to-be ex-wife partially, he still now faces the task of hiring an attorney and missing work to attend a court date to argue for getting his gun rights restored.

What can you do to prepare for a ?surprise? visit from police with a red flag order in hand?
If you sense a spike in drama on the home front ? such as a divorce or child custody dispute ? you can preemptively re-locate at least some of your firearms (and maybe ammo and magazines as well) at a trusted friend?s or relative?s place. I?ve done this for friends. And nearly a decade ago, when I was getting divorced, some friends it did for me.

Even without drama, don?t keep all your eggs in one basket. Do you have an extra defensive pistol, shotgun and/or carbine or three? Store them at a trusted friend or relative?s house. It?s a good hedge against fire or theft in addition to domestic disputes.

Be sure to keep this cache between you, the guy upstairs and your trusted friend or relative.

Along the same lines, PVC pipe and PVC glue at the local hardware store doesn?t cost much. And everyone has a shovel. Springtime is here. The coming weeks will make a fine time to plant some flowers outside your house.

Just be sure to check your local laws in terms of compliance with a court order and continued possession in violation of a court order.

While a number of readers posted some good comments, two in particular stood out to me.

John in Ohio shared this:

Years ago, it was not uncommon for us friends to loan to each other at least one long gun and perhaps a handgun; with ammunition, magazines, etc. They were in cases, go bags, or boxes which the person never touched or opened.

It wasn?t unheard of that the property was stored in a location that the owner of the firearms had access to without outside assistance. Barns, workshops, sheds, storage facilities, and other such places were utilized. Many of my friends knew where the keys to the barns, workshop, and vehicles were kept on our farm so they could access these places and use the vehicles in a time of great need or urgency.

Perhaps it?s past time for some to think about these contingency plans.

And Porkchop wrote this:

If they have a ?red flag? order to seize the firearms, they already have the authority to search for them. Unless you want your entire dwelling turned upside down, you might as well let them know where the firearms are stored. Depending on the officers involved, I suppose that could happen anyway, but why give them an excuse?

Another thing to consider is that your actions and attitude during the seizure might be used as evidence during the hearing that will ultimately take place. If you go off on a rant about ?that *? or otherwise lose your temper, you just give the petitioner more evidence to put before the judge to support the argument that you are too dangerous and unstable to have a firearm.

If I were to represent a client (yes, I?m a lawyer) in a proceeding following such a seizure, my ideal witness would be a cop who testified that he served the order on my client, that my client was calm, polite, and cooperative at all times, and that the only request that he made was that he be allowed to call his lawyer.

I would also like to hear him say that the client seemed surprised, but made no effort to find out the source of the information that led to the order. That?s my job. Asking, ?Who did this to me?? or ?Did Mary put you up to this?? just feeds the narrative that you have a beef with Mary, and maybe, just maybe, Mary might be right to fear you.

In addition, you have just given the officer an excuse to ask, ?So what?s the problem with Mary?? He can write your answer in his report, and it is admissible in evidence; but if you say something different in court, that original answer may come back to bite you.

In short, when you are in a deep hole, stop digging. Just shut up, do what the officer says, and let us sort it out in court. You may lose, but at least you will not have made it easier for the other side to prove its case.

Some things you won?t be able to do
If you are served with a red flag order, you will not be able to purchase firearms. Not only would lying on a 4473 expose you to federal and probably state charges, but the NICS check would probably block the sale even if you did lie misrepresent your status.

Another thing not to do: refuse to allow cops entry into your home if they show up on the doorstep with that court order. They have the right to enter and the will do it. If you resist, they will use force. Up to and including deadly force.

You won?t get your guns back if you?re dead.

Even if you?re sure you?re in the right and the order is frivolous or maliciously-inspired, you won?t win that debate with the police officers standing on your doorstep. They are coming in and they will be taking your firearms. You won?t be helping your chances of getting your guns back at a later date giving law enforcement a hard time.

Best advice: bite your tongue. As Porkchop wrote above, the best course of action may be to help the officers collect the guns in an effort to expedite their mission and get them out of your home as soon as possible. If you don?t assist them, they may end up crawling around in your attic, poking around in your basement ? or worse.

What next?
At that point, you will need to retain a lawyer to represent you at the formal hearing that will take place in about 10 days or so.

Perhaps the best way to protect yourself from these gun seizure comes by buying a little peace of mind. While you will lose the battle on the day the cops show up with a Red Flag, knowing you won?t have to spend a bunch of money on an attorney to win the war will help you stay calm as cops carry away your shotguns, rifles and handguns.

Some gun owners insurance programs such as US Law Shield will represent its clients in red flag hearings. I signed up for the US Law Shield for just that reason. It?s about $130 for a year?s basic coverage.

I consider it money well spent, especially given how I tend to anger people with some regularity in my jobs.
The government has no rights. Only the people have rights which empowers the government.
We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.

I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:

Comments

  • Options
    select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    All the nonsense about SC having assault weapons banned was just nonsense. Non of it got anywhere..
  • Options
    chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 13,777 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Red flag laws mean on thing: an unconstitutional assault on your rights by DEMOCRATs
  • Options
    jimdeerejimdeere Member, Moderator Posts: 25,649 ******
    edited April 2019
    ?Some things you won?t be able to do
    If you are served with a red flag order, you will not be able to purchase firearms. Not only would lying on a 4473 expose you to federal and probably state charges, but the NICS check would probably block the sale even if you did lie misrepresent your status.?

    Questions:
    On which of the questions on the 4473 form would you be lying, if you immediately went and purchased another firearm?
    Will the authorities be asking you if this all the firearms you have in your possession?
    Are you committing a crime if you answer falsely?
  • Options
    mjrfd99mjrfd99 Member Posts: 4,556 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Quick&Dead, Good advice. Spot on.

    I lying AH can ruin everything.
    We can cry "unconstitutional" till blue in the face.
    We can blame demonrats.
    Some POS rats you out? Your screwed.

    Bottom line - be prepared.
  • Options
    savage170savage170 Member Posts: 37,453 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Here in Florida we can't blame the democrats it was given to us by the Republicans and Marco wants it to go nation wide
  • Options
    Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,473 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    'Do not piss off the wife' laws are spreading and are being supported by politicians of both stripes at the local and national level.

    It is a knee-jerk reaction based upon the address mental health mantra supported by the mainstream Republicans and the NRA following all nationally publicized shootings, mass or otherwise.

    The advise given in the OP is akin to the 'lay back and enjoy it' advise proffered years ago by a political candidate in Texas(?) some years ago.

    Everyone will react differently. Storing items off-site is a good idea obviously, but one must be sure that the items stored off-site have no paper trail. As firearm purchase laws are strengthened across the country, there are fewer and fewer firearms left that have no paper trail.

    Hard to predict how one will react at 4:00 in the am when a group of armed thugs breaks down your door. Some will react instinctively to protect hearth and home. In these cases, some of the armed thugs will be shot.

    In a just world, Due Process includes the individual subject to that process. In the case of these Red Flag Laws, that critical part of the Process is ignored, thus it is virtually impossible to craft these laws within 4th Amendment boundaries.

    In my opinion, of course.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • Options
    jeffb1911jeffb1911 Member Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think we need to suggest that RED FLAG laws also be used to take the PRIVELEDGE of DRIVING from women for the same reason! How many stories of women spurned running over their ex? Come to think of it, these "pissed off the wife" laws would already take away driving privileges if it was truly about preventing assault. The OP is correct in how to respond to such orders though. Stay calm, and get your ducks in a row for a very effective fight in court where you can actually present evidence instead of having lies told about you without your knowledge.

    Also, keep a written record of what you have secured somewhere else so it could not disappear when things are seized. Still, try to get a written receipt for all that is taken with serial numbers and condition. Then compare the two if this ever happens to you. And if they have become seriously deteriorated in condition due to improper handling or very poor storage, that might help you recover damages.
  • Options
    patt7638patt7638 Member Posts: 363 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Indiana does not have a red flag law.
  • Options
    hillbillehillbille Member Posts: 14,169 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    jimdeere wrote:
    ?Some things you won?t be able to do
    If you are served with a red flag order, you will not be able to purchase firearms. Not only would lying on a 4473 expose you to federal and probably state charges, but the NICS check would probably block the sale even if you did lie misrepresent your status.?

    Questions:
    On which of the questions on the 4473 form would you be lying, if you immediately went and purchased another firearm?
    Will the authorities be asking you if this all the firearms you have in your possession?
    Are you committing a crime if you answer falsely?
    I would guess technically the one about being legally able to own a firearm, once served you loose that right till you go to court to prove you are able to own them.
  • Options
    slumlord44slumlord44 Member Posts: 3,702 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I unfortunately live in Illinois and it's a potential nightmare. Piss off most anyone and they can come and get your guns. Then the real problems start in trying to get them back. My wife, kids, inlaws, tennants, friends or aquaintences could make this happen. My concern as a collector is that I have large numbers of collectable guns worth in the mid 6 figure range. Condition is everything in their value. A couple of county sheriff deputys are not going to have the knowledge or equipment to haul them all out without doing damage. No idea how many vehicles it would take to haul them all away. Where are they going to be able to secure that volume of guns? I could easily have 6 figures in damages if and when I ever get them back. Will I be paid market value if for some reason I am not able to get them back? There is definately a constitutional problem in taking property without just compensation. The bump stock issue has already set the presicedent with no provision for payment of confiscated property. The sad part is that they can take all my guns and if I am committed to killing someone I will not be stopped, A knife from the kitchen or a hammer from the garage will do the job.
  • Options
    nmyersnmyers Member Posts: 16,879 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Maryland is 1 of eight states that has enacted a red flag law.

    It used to be, to get your guns taken away the complainant had to appear before the judge & swear that you were a danger to her; theoretically, lying to the judge could get the complainant a perjury charge, but that rarely happened.

    Beginning this year, the complainant files an "extreme risk restraining order", which is reviewed by a court commissioner (who is not a judge, & may not even by a lawyer.) And, instead of knocking on the door at dinner time, the cops may just break down your door at 3:00 am. Foggy & confused, one unlucky fellow made a bad decision last year & got himself shot.

    Most folks find that they have to hire a lawyer to get their guns returned.

    Neal
  • Options
    Quick&DeadQuick&Dead Member Posts: 1,466 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    slumlord44 wrote:
    I unfortunately live in Illinois and it's a potential nightmare. Piss off most anyone and they can come and get your guns. Then the real problems start in trying to get them back. My wife, kids, inlaws, tennants, friends or aquaintences could make this happen. My concern as a collector is that I have large numbers of collectable guns worth in the mid 6 figure range. Condition is everything in their value. A couple of county sheriff deputys are not going to have the knowledge or equipment to haul them all out without doing damage. No idea how many vehicles it would take to haul them all away. Where are they going to be able to secure that volume of guns? I could easily have 6 figures in damages if and when I ever get them back. Will I be paid market value if for some reason I am not able to get them back? There is definately a constitutional problem in taking property without just compensation. The bump stock issue has already set the presicedent with no provision for payment of confiscated property. The sad part is that they can take all my guns and if I am committed to killing someone I will not be stopped, A knife from the kitchen or a hammer from the garage will do the job.

    Therein is the question: Would placing all your firearms in a TRUST save them from confiscation?
    This, of course, is a legal question.

    :?:
    The government has no rights. Only the people have rights which empowers the government.
    We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
    Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.

    I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:
  • Options
    wpageabcwpageabc Member Posts: 8,760 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Shame, wonder what the writers of the constitution would think of red flag laws...

    Sounds like a flagrant violation of the 2nd amendment.
    "What is truth?'
  • Options
    Quick&DeadQuick&Dead Member Posts: 1,466 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    wpageabc wrote:
    Shame, wonder what the writers of the constitution would think of red flag laws...

    Sounds like a flagrant violation of the 2nd amendment.


    And more specifically, the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.


    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.
    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
    The government has no rights. Only the people have rights which empowers the government.
    We have enough gun laws, what we need is IDIOT control.
    Blood makes you related. Loyalty makes you family.

    I thought getting old would take longer. :shock:
  • Options
    serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    chiefr wrote:
    Red flag laws mean on thing: an unconstitutional assault on your rights by DEMOCRATs

    President Trump is for it also but since it will be a state right issue he will not have to worry about alienated his base until after 2020 election. With due process of law only means that the majority of so-called violators will not be able to purchase(buy) a lawyer to seek justice and either will be given a court-appointed attorney or go into massive debt and still lose in a kangaroo court.

    serf

    Prejudicial bias of the decision-maker or from political decree are among the most publicized causes of kangaroo courts.] Such proceedings are often held to give the appearance of a fair and just trial, even though the verdict was already decided before the trial actually began.

    Example the supreme court imprisoning Japanese citizens in WWII.
  • Options
    lt496lt496 Member Posts: 116
    edited November -1
    Ah yes...the 'Donald Trump/NRA adopted and advocated for Red Flag anti-Constitution acts'. Unconstitutional gun seizure first, due process later.

    A prime exemplar of desired and advocated actions -vs- rhetoric to fool voters and Fuddites.

    Context can be one's friend. Truth always is.
    "Freedom is not for the timid" III% BFYTW
  • Options
    wpageabcwpageabc Member Posts: 8,760 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Some lawyer should make a few bucks on these...
    Quick&Dead wrote:
    wpageabc wrote:
    Shame, wonder what the writers of the constitution would think of red flag laws...

    Sounds like a flagrant violation of the 2nd amendment.


    And more specifically, the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.


    Amendment XIV
    Section 1.
    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
    "What is truth?'
Sign In or Register to comment.