In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
The 1st and 2nd amendment fight
n/a
Member Posts: 168,427 ✭
Federal Law:
Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897) The Court stated that laws regulating concealed arms did not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms, and thus were not a violation of the Second Amendment.
Taken from the Court Documents:
Thus, the freedom of speech and of the press (Art. I) does not permit the publication of libels, blasphemous or indecent articles or speech, or other publications injurious to public morals or private reputation; the right of the people
Page 165 U. S. 282
to keep and bear arms (Art. II) is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons;
Way back then, and they still are arguing over it....
Robertson v. Baldwin, 165 U.S. 275 (1897) The Court stated that laws regulating concealed arms did not infringe upon the right to keep and bear arms, and thus were not a violation of the Second Amendment.
Taken from the Court Documents:
Thus, the freedom of speech and of the press (Art. I) does not permit the publication of libels, blasphemous or indecent articles or speech, or other publications injurious to public morals or private reputation; the right of the people
Page 165 U. S. 282
to keep and bear arms (Art. II) is not infringed by laws prohibiting the carrying of concealed weapons;
Way back then, and they still are arguing over it....
Comments
Edit: fat fingered typo (thanks P3)
Clearly the doings of the NRA, since they were formed in 1971.
I think they're a bit older than that.