In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Illegal Machine Guns from parts kits

leeblackmanleeblackman Member Posts: 5,303 ✭✭
edited August 2002 in General Discussion
I keep seeing all these full auto parts kits and partial recievers. It looks so easy, just any "run-of-the-mill" garage or basement gunsmith could put one together. I wonder how many people are assembling illegal machineguns from them. I bet the numbers are growing. I wonder if we'll start seeing new laws being made because of this.

If I'm wrong please correct me, I won't be offended.

The sound of a 12 gauge pump clears a house fatser than Rosie O eats a Big Mac !

Comments

  • leeblackmanleeblackman Member Posts: 5,303 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I bet there's more illegal Sten's than any other machineguns out there. It looks like it would be cheaper to assemble an illegal one than to try to make a semi-auto legal version.

    If I'm wrong please correct me, I won't be offended.

    The sound of a 12 gauge pump clears a house fatser than Rosie O eats a Big Mac !
  • alledanalledan Member Posts: 19,541
    edited November -1
    Lee--These kits have been around for decades! Magazines, gunshows and online auctions have sold millions of these kits thru out time.
    I would venture to say that there are several million of various machine guns out there that no one knows about.
    In some instances all that is needed is a drop in auto sear and a few parts to assemble a working unit for certain factory assembled guns instead of milling,machining and welding that most of the kits require.
    From what i hear the M-1 to M-2 carbine [along with the AR-15]is the easiest because there is no machining work-just assemble the M-2 parts to your M-1 and there you go.

    I personally believe that one good well placed shot is worth the best MG. Mg's are a waste of ammo because most rounds run amuck

    JMHO!
  • v35v35 Member Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Why make information on this subject public?
  • RosieRosie Member Posts: 14,525 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    My question is if you weld one of these kits so it cannot be made to fire full auto would it be legal? I think I will call the BATF and ask them Monday. It would make a nice winter project.
  • Rafter-SRafter-S Member Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    To make a Model A Uzi full auto all you need to do is drop in a slotted (open) bolt, the full auto spring and buffer, the sear, and when you reassemble it, leave out the grip safety. The Model B works the same but there is a small tab welded to the bottom of the receiver that needs grinding away (Moto tool will do).

    But let me remind you; if you do the above, you stand the risk of spending several years as a guest of the government, be $20,000 lighter, and never be able to legally own a firearm again.

    Making guns operate full auto is not hard for the determined, but it ain't worth it. If you want to own a machinegun, do it legally. That ain't hard either, and it's a lot more fun.
  • Judge DreadJudge Dread Member Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    A set of micro switches some electronics and you can make any semy auto in a full auto with a 6V solenoid with no gun alterations ....
    and fit it into a suitcase.

    v35? We make this public because this is a police state and we want you to be able to earn that $$$$$ rewards for Justice money by snitching at us... we later can split the money when we come out....

    HEHEHE....

    JD

    400 million cows can't be wrong ( EAT GRASS !!! )
  • sandman2234sandman2234 Member Posts: 894 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have a Friend who has purchased just about10 of every kit you can imagine. I have seen a small portion of them, and He has more different kits than I have guns. None of them have been modified in any way from the time he purchased them. Reason... Just in case the government decides to overrun us. He wants unregistered guns, and this is one way to achieve that object. When they come, and he has to give up his guns, He will have a few to get them back with.
    Sandman2234

    Have Gun, will travel
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm not going to stick my neck out again and make any hard and fast statements, but it is my understanding that simple possession of a full auto minor parts kit (like sear & springs) along with a semi-auto version of the gun they go into is the same as possession of a full auto gun. So if you own a legal Uzi carbine, and a bag of full auto Uzi parts, you are afoul of federal law unless you have the appropriate NFA stamp, etc.

    As far as the parts kits are concerned, I recently asked a gunsmith who enjoys accurizing ARs why it wouldn't be a good business deal to start up a business assembling Krinkovs from the major parts kits, and he said the law says a person may only assemble one, for himself. If you assemble more than one, you become a manufacturer.

    If you know how to turn any gun into full auto, you know a little more than I do on the subject. I hear there's a little more to making an M2 out of an M1 than just replacing a couple parts -- the stocks are slightly different, etc. But there's no question that not only are there parts kits on sale in little baggies by mail or at gun shows, but also there are receiverless guns being sold disassembled as "parts kits." Add a receiver, and assemble. There are also blueprints for the few little parts you need to manufacture for a given gun that can be purchased from places like Paladin Press. I think I've got a pamphlet around here somewhere that talks about making an AK a full auto weapon, and it has "cut-out" diagrams for milling the necessary few little parts.

    It's no secret, so we're not giving away anything here. I do think it's an interesting question. Frankly, I would like to have some of these parts guns, like the Krinkov, that aren't widely available at dealers, and the only reasonably priced way to get them anyway is to buy the parts kit and assemble your own. The companies that put them together for you want a $1500 premium for the favor (or more). A Krinkov kit is abour $400. A Krinkov from Urban Armory is maybe $1700 to $2400, with a pinned folding stock in some cases!

    The BATF considers a full auto receiver a machine gun all by itself. They also consider some parts kits machine guns. The distributor or mail order house normally knows this and is fairly scrupulous about not selling you a kit that needs NFA papers unless you and he satisfy the law. All I can say is, it's tough to buy certain parts kits if you're not a lawyer and a machinist, because there are times when I don't know which parts would cause trouble for me.

    I think that I generally take the attitude that I trust the seller not to sell me anything illegally. They are the experts, right? But I don't flash around my stuff either, even though I have nothing NFA at present. People see my semi-auto AK and many are dumb enough to assume they've seen a man with a machine gun. I can do without that kind of hassle. Same goes for parts kits.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

    Edited by - offeror on 08/18/2002 00:45:47
  • agloreaglore Member Posts: 6,012
    edited November -1
    A hunting partner of mine had a Ruger Mini-14 that he had sent down to Chief AJ about 9 years ago to have them accurize it. Well the stuff they put on them to help slick up the trigger pull was so slippery that about every 40-45 rounds it would go off on a 3 round burst when you squeezed the trigger. Needless to say he just parked it in his gun cabinet after a couple of weeks and it still sits there to this day.

    AlleninAlaska

    He who dares not offend cannot be honest.
    -- Thomas Paine
  • Rafter-SRafter-S Member Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    offeror-- I think you're right on the possession of some parts being illegal. The way I understnad it, an unregistered slotted bolt like I mentioned above will get you 10 and 20 just for posession, with or without the Uzi to go with it.
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I believe the only firearm the BTAF has recognized as illegal to own in combination with full auto parts is the AR-15/M-16 ...

    However, if your talking about full auto parts that have been MODIFIED to fit a semi-auto receiver and function as a full auto weapon, then you are talking deep do-do. As in the case of an HK, possession of MODIFIED FA parts to function as a full auto weapon on a semi-auto receiver ... even without possession of the weapon, will probably, by certain ATF employees opinion, constitute possession of a machine gun (unless the full auto trip lever and sear are removed)and this is in spite of the U.S. Constitution (2nd Amendment specifically) and its clear and unmistakably stated rights for the citizens of this country (USA) to obtain, make, or possess select fire military (militia) type firearms without taxation or interference from any Federal (or State) Government employees - Select Fire conversion should only be completed after compliance with applicable inferior Federal and/or State firearms laws in order to avoid possible prosecution for violations of said inferior laws - albeit they are unconstitutional.

    ======================================================
    Just because your paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you!kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • cpilericpileri Member Posts: 447 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you were to shoot a semi-auto anything (10/22 or 12ga, doesn't matter) SOOOOOO much that you wore down the sear, etc and it began firing in bursts- like in the post above; then what?

    Do you have to register it with the BATF as a new MG?

    Is it too unsafe to fire and just get it fixed? has anyone purposely NOT fixed a suddenly-bursting-previously-semi-auto? how long did it last?

    seems like it would scare the bejeezus out of me. hasn't happened yet. the devil in me would want to play with it awhile, but the father in me wouldn't want anything bad to happen to my son's father (me).

    C-

    ___________________________
    God, Guts, and Guns: keeping America Strong for 200 years.
    (sig about Clinton's talk show changed, though I thought it was pretty creative without overt vulgarity)
  • cpilericpileri Member Posts: 447 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you were to shoot a semi-auto anything (10/22 or 12ga, doesn't matter) SOOOOOO much that you wore down the sear, etc and it began firing in bursts- like in the post above; then what?

    Do you have to register it with the BATF as a new MG?

    Is it too unsafe to fire and just get it fixed? has anyone purposely NOT fixed a suddenly-bursting-previously-semi-auto? how long did it last?

    seems like it would scare the bejeezus out of me. hasn't happened yet. the devil in me would want to play with it awhile, but the father in me wouldn't want anything bad to happen to my son's father (me).

    C-

    ___________________________
    God, Guts, and Guns: keeping America Strong for 200 years.
    (sig about Clinton's talk show changed, though I thought it was pretty creative without overt vulgarity)
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    If it scares you, get it fixed. No big deal -- the gun wore down and it's a matter of repair at a gunsmith's.

    On the other hand, I would say it's clear none of us who has posted so far has the bottom line on this -- we have this general sense of what would be troublesome. Somebody asked if it's likely there are a lot of kits out there that nobody knows about. I tend to say yes, first because kits aren't being registered as guns are. And second, a little bag of parts can have just about anything in it unless every one is scrutinized thoroughly. And a lot of that import stuff may or may not contain precisely what is advertised. Would I like to have a parts kit against the eventuality of civil strife where 3-round bursts would come in handy against men running between cover -- yup. Am I willing to risk prison. Absolutely not. Would I fix a gun right away that started bursting -- depends on whether it was uncontrollable and unreliable, I guess. I might be tempted to schedule the repair later rather than sooner.... There is nothing illegal about a broken or worn out gun, any more than there is anything illegal about a Hellfire doo-dad. Just don't go milling or cutting any parts in your shop, Mr. Weaver.....

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Let's be clear about one thing. The parts kits being offered in Shotgun News and Gun List are not illegal, or they would be shut down quick. And the parts kits would be quite useless unless one could put them together somehow -- unless you imagine there are already people holding Krinkovs and Stens in this country who are creating a large spare parts market for these guys -- which is laughable.

    I can only guess that we are expected to buy the parts kit, get a receiver from another source, and then be certain to build a gun that only fires semi-auto. Strange, but plausible.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • Rafter-SRafter-S Member Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    One of the definitions of a machinegun is, "a firearm that will fire more than one time with a single pull of the trigger." I read that several years ago in BATF literature furnished to dealers. So under that definition, your worn semi-auto that fires occasional doubles and tripples...well you can be the judge.

    Personally, I would have any such firearm repaired immediately if for no other reason but safety. Can you imagine the liabilities that would be on your head if that gun accidentally hurt someone and it was brought out in court that you knew it was so worn that it periodically went full auto?
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Frankly I wouldn't want a gun that periodically went full auto any more than a soldier would. Control is key. If I had a gun that was "liable" to go double or triple tap, it would be getting new parts.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • thesoundguy1thesoundguy1 Member Posts: 680
    edited November -1
    I see there is a lot of interest on this subject, and I've wondered the same thing.I have an interest based on the possibility of a break down in our federal government.In the event of that happening, I want the most effective tools for defending my life,my family,my community
    and our ideology contained in the constitution.
    I'm interested in buying and keeping various select fire parts kits
    (and I believe I have that right), in the event that just such a thing
    happens.


    www.waveformwear.com
    The new wave in free expression.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Since the need for such parts is theoretical and you pose the possibility of a "government breakdown" requiring some sort of special self-defense requirements, there are only two ways to legally prepare for this eventuality.

    One is to get the parts kits within the law, acquiring any NFA licensing, stamps, etc. that are necessary to own the kits and/or the weapons.

    The other is to buy the diagrams and the necessary machine equipment to build the parts, but don't build them until the government has broken down beyond the point at which anyone but the enemy will mind your making the parts without a license(!).

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • thesoundguy1thesoundguy1 Member Posts: 680
    edited November -1
    If you get NFA licensing, are you going to be visited by the ATF on a periodic basis to "Inspect" your firearms, and ammo?

    www.waveformwear.com
    The new wave in free expression.

    Edited by - thesoundguy1 on 08/19/2002 12:52:25
  • RosieRosie Member Posts: 14,525 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you want your questions answered do as I did this morning and call the BATF. None of you responded to my question about a semi auto so I called the Fort Wayne office of the BATF and they were very helpful. As a matter of fact if I do decide to start a winter project I will take my plans to them first so they can see first hand what I want to do and say yes or no. Better to be safe than sorry.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Rosie --

    You didn't ask for an answer, you said you'd call the BATF on Monday, a smart idea. Anything you learn from them, feel free to post here as I'm sure it is of interest.

    I did say, in an above post, "I can only guess that we are expected to buy the parts kit, get a receiver from another source, and then be certain to build a gun that only fires semi-auto. Strange, but plausible."

    I assume that if Urban Armory may manufacture a gun and weld or pin it to make it legal, you can do the same. But I would never foist my assumption on you as anything more than a half-educated guess. Let us know what the Ft. Wayne BATF office had to say (I didn't even know we had a local BATF office).



    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

    Edited by - offeror on 08/19/2002 13:19:00
  • RosieRosie Member Posts: 14,525 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    offeror
    I was talking about a sten kit and they said the short time that it would take to convert I would not be legal which I knew. I asked them if I were to buy the lower parts kit and weld it so it could not be made into a full auto and then buy the tube and weld it to that then finish the tube if that would work and they said they thought so. However, I told them if I decide to start this project I would like to bring a layout of my plans for them to see and they said they would be happy to look at them. I don't think a man could ask for any more than that. Remember they were talking about owning both sections of this gun at the same that would be breaking the law.Rosie
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Exactly. Own all the parts necessary to assemble the auto, and they call it an auto.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • boeboeboeboe Member Posts: 3,331
    edited November -1
    I think with a Sten parts set, owning the set and owning a car with the correct diameter muffler pipe would put you in violation....

    To err is human, to moo is bovine.
Sign In or Register to comment.