In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

For Shootist...

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited April 2002 in General Discussion
Well,since you have an extreme adversion to double posts,there is one on the board right now.If it sticks in your craw so much lets see you be consistant for once and let them know their error.No,I thought not this is why I don't take comments like yours seriously.

"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Comments

  • Shootist3006Shootist3006 Member Posts: 4,171
    edited November -1
    Well gosh josey, first you get upset because I question whether or not you even read any other posts and now you get upset because I don't question when another double posts something.
    You did say quote: I just want you to know that you should worry about your own house before stepping into anothers. didn't you?
    Next time let me know when you want inconsistency and when you don't!

    BTW, I could give a rat's * whether or not you take me seriously

    Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem.Semper Fidelis
  • beachmaster73beachmaster73 Member Posts: 3,011 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    X-Ring shootist!! Beach
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well gosh josey, first you get upset because I question whether or not you even read any other posts and now you get upset because I don't question when another double posts something.
    You did say

    Shootist I swear,you are doing more dancing around the fact than most liberals.First,it annoyed me that you write TWO POSTS to tell me that I double posted like I did it with any malice.You went on to question my attention(or lack thereof),my judgement and my disretion,why?Because I mistakingly posted a topic that your high and mightyness already did.Upset? No,but I'll be damned if I will sit here and be judged by someone with a serious inferiority complex.

    Second,I want you to understand this,if you are going to start a bunch of BS because someone reposts an article,THEN YOU SHOULD THINK ABOUT BEING A TAD MORE CONSISTANT WHENOTHERS HAVE AND ARE DOING THE SAME.Otherwise your credibility is for naught




    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • beachmaster73beachmaster73 Member Posts: 3,011 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Josey....Without casting any stones I think Shootist was really referring to the shear volume of posting that you post every day on the forum. Perhaps if you started limiting the mega articles to four to six per day there would be more meaningful discussion of the articles. I know we all had this discussion a long time ago and that a lot of our forum enjoys them. I think though that there is a large segment who would certain comment more if only the most relevant were posted daily. Anyway think about it and see if you don't get more discussion on the articles by culling out the more extraneous. All the best, Beach.
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Beach,with all due respect I am not posting for the sole reason of stimulating conversation.Most of my posts are for matter of fact,informational purposes.We have gone over this a thousand times and the overwhelming majority wish for me to continue posting these articles.Those who don't,do not have to read them.I just don't like being attacked for something that is done many times daily by other posters.Respectfully,Josey

    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • Shootist3006Shootist3006 Member Posts: 4,171
    edited November -1
    quote:No,but I'll be damned if I will sit here and be judged by someone with a serious inferiority complex.

    quote: I just don't like being attacked for something that is done many times daily by other posters.

    If you think that commenting on a duplication of posts is attacking or judging, maybe we should be discussing just who has an inferiority complex (or maybe an inferiority complex aggrevated by rampant paranoia).

    Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem.Semper Fidelis
Sign In or Register to comment.