In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Electoral College,.......

Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
edited November 2016 in General Discussion
How many here believe this election will be confirmed by said electors as it stands, or do you think there is a REAL chance that some of these subversive moves to dissuade electors from sticking with Trump could succeed?

I'm no huge Trump fan, (yes I voted for him), but these sick games being played are making me and a lot of folks I know angrier by the day. There are people out there that are committing acts that should result in a severe penalty IMHO.

Never thought I would see this kind of divisiveness in my country.
"Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner

Comments

  • 1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    hope not, they think they have riots now
  • medic07medic07 Member Posts: 5,222 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think it is a real possibility that electors will vote for Clinton despite Trump carrying their state.

    People want popular vote to rule. If that is allowed, Democrats will forever hold the White House. New York City, LA, SAn Fran, San Diego and other major urban areas overwhelmingly vote liberal and the Midwest gets wiped out by them.
  • 47studebaker47studebaker Member Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    there was a story that Soros was talking about paying off the electors.
  • Rack OpsRack Ops Member Posts: 18,596 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The results will stand.
  • medic07medic07 Member Posts: 5,222 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think it is a real possibility that electors will vote for Clinton despite Trump carrying their state.

    People want popular vote to rule. If that is allowed, Democrats will forever hold the White House. New York City, LA, SAn Fran, San Diego and other major urban areas overwhelmingly vote liberal and the Midwest gets wiped out by them.
  • ruger41ruger41 Member Posts: 14,665 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I believe some will but don't know if enough would to change the result. There is one WA State elector that has said they would not vote Trump. These Dems are so full of poop because they sure didn't want the Electoral College out when Bill Clinton or Barack Obama won.
  • dakotashooter2dakotashooter2 Member Posts: 6,186
    edited November -1
    One of the reasons for the electoral vote is to make it harder for large states like california to dominate elections. While the popular vote for Hillary may (?) Be higher I suspect most of those votes are from states who's electoral votes already went to Hillary. Probably 60-70% of the state's could overwhelmingly vote for trump and still come up short on the popular vote. One could ask...is it fair that 1/2 dozen states would be able to dictate the fate of the whole country? Would Californians like if North Dakota was able to control their politics.
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    Not likely.

    Quit getting your news on blogs, obscure websites, and Facebook if you think there is real talk about really doing it.

    It was a personal question I had, not as a result of reading blogs or obscure websites,....and I don't even have a Facebook account.

    There ARE moves being made that are mentioned by major news sources if you bother listening. How valid they are is another story, and the reason I asked the question.

    BTW,...go pound sand troll.
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • CaptFunCaptFun Member Posts: 16,678 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301


    BTW,...go pound sand troll.


    Point of ORDER ...

    Your OP was the TROLL post.
  • Dads3040Dads3040 Member Posts: 13,552 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301


    BTW,...go pound sand troll.


    Point of ORDER ...

    Your OP was the TROLL post.



    Point of Clarification...

    Could you illustrate what portion of the OP falls under generally accepted standards of 'trolling'?
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Asking how many people think something being reported on the news everyday could happen is now considered trolling?

    That's a new one on me, as well as being called a troll for the first time since joining here over ten years ago.
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • bpostbpost Member Posts: 32,669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    TED CRUZ FOR PRESIDENT!

    Now that would be awesome!!![^][^][^][^][^][^][^][^]
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,108 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    All this banter over the EC is nothing more than an effort by the DEMOCRATs to delegitimize the election and arouse their base.

    Keep in mind main stream media IS the DEMOCRAT party. False narratives, deceit, subterfuge, and outright lies are espoused almost every hour in efforts to destroy Trump.

    I have lived long enough to remember the DEMOCRATS praising the EC when results were in their favor. The hypocrisy of these leftist is unprecedented.
  • kimikimi Member Posts: 44,719 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It'll never fly, as I see it, Mark. The subversive move that is.
    What's next?
  • mogley98mogley98 Member Posts: 18,291 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think it has to go as the people in the states voted it.

    Of course if they stole the election I doubt working folks would have time to do a lot of protesting.
    Why don't we go to school and work on the weekends and take the week off!
  • GrasshopperGrasshopper Member Posts: 17,019 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by us55840
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301

    Never thought I would see this kind of divisiveness in my country.



    And for that, you can thank Obama and the likes of Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, George Soros, and a host of other liberal, socialist, commies.




    ^^^^^^^^^^^ SIMPLE ENOUGH,, Barry has put so much fuel on this fire now Trump has to put it out.
    I heard Barry "speak" again yesterday,, I mean this guy is completely nuts,,,he really believes in the slop he washes with.[|)]
  • kimikimi Member Posts: 44,719 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Grasshopper
    quote:Originally posted by us55840
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301

    Never thought I would see this kind of divisiveness in my country.



    And for that, you can thank Obama and the likes of Al Sharpton, Jessie Jackson, George Soros, and a host of other liberal, socialist, commies.




    ^^^^^^^^^^^ SIMPLE ENOUGH,, Barry has put so much fuel on this fire now Trump has to put it out.
    I heard Barry "speak" again yesterday,, I mean this guy is completely nuts,,,he really believes in the slop he washes with.[|)]


    He is the lowest kind of lowlife.
    What's next?
  • mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Who elected or appointed the electors? What process was used?

    I looked into the process and after a few hours could not get good solid info.

    So, if the cronyism reaches as deep as we know, so it would seem it reaches to the electors.

    If the house and senate are now R, it stands to reason the electors have the same mindset and thus will not change to vote the hag in.

    They could, and they could vote her as VP best I can discern, but they won't. There were rumors a few elections back about electors having been deceased and still voting.

    If the electors carry so much power, why are we not getting more info on how they are selected. Where is the oversight? Not much on it easy to find.
  • mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mogley98
    I think it has to go as the people in the states voted it.

    Of course if they stole the election I doubt working folks would have time to do a lot of protesting.




    I read that many states have laws that say the elector has to vote as the people voted. Additionally, some states will fine the electors if they don't
  • Dads3040Dads3040 Member Posts: 13,552 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Barzillia
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301
    Asking how many people think something being reported on the news everyday could happen is now considered trolling?

    That's a new one on me, as well as being called a troll for the first time since joining here over ten years ago.


    Well, lets look at what you are claiming:

    "How many here believe this election will be confirmed by said electors as it stands, or do you think there is a REAL chance that some of these subversive moves to dissuade electors from sticking with Trump could succeed?"


    You had to get the idea from somewhere, as you are referencing something using inflammatory terms and unproven assertions that don't come from nowhere.
    No, they don't come from nowhere. They come from a leftist petition on Change.org that on last review had 4.3 million signatures. The effort has been reported and discussed in places like the WaPo, FoxNews, and The Independent UK. Not exactly fringe organizations.
    "I'm no huge Trump fan, (yes I voted for him), but these sick games being played are making me and a lot of folks I know angrier by the day."


    As above. Repeating goofy conspiracy rumors as if there was an actual basis to believe them and thumping your chest about how angry you and your nameless friends are about a non-existent or highly unlikely to occur event is pointless, is it not ? If not, just what are you trying to gain ?
    It may have escaped your notice, given that you are a leftist yourself, but much of what passes for 'thought' on the left is 'goofy conspiracy conspiracy rumors'. However unlikely the actual occurrence may be, discussing what political opponents might do isn't exactly a newly discovered activity.

    "There are people out there that are committing acts that should result in a severe penalty IMHO."


    Nameless people and dark forces are doing what to sabotage the electoral college ?

    ???
    Had you spent any time watching news of current events, you might have noticed acts other than just the petition. Riots. Endless protests. Attacks on Trump supporters. Ring any bells?

    "Never thought I would see this kind of divisiveness in my country."

    Don't bring it, and there might be a whole lot less.
    It is not unusual for the left to blame the right for what they are themselves doing. It is called 'projection', and leftists like you do it very regularly.

    Trolling ?

    How many times have you called me, or anyone else in these forums, a troll ?
    Since you do little else on this forum but trolling, it ought not surprise you to get labelled accurately.

    If you have never been called the same, then perhaps you should just meditate upon that fact for a while.

    It's no proof that you are innocent.
    Perhaps not, but it certainly sets a higher probability of innocence than someone who trolls like a fisherman dragging a lure. Personally, I think the question asked by the OP is car short of trolling as it applies to the Interweb, and I think absent some unforeseen explanation from the Capt, that opinion is unlikely to change. My opinion of you is unlikely to change, even if you bring the Pope as a character witness, and a letter of recommendation from Jesus. You are a troll. Thanks for playing. We have some lovely parting gifts.
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,404 ******
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by CaptFun
    quote:Originally posted by Marc1301


    BTW,...go pound sand troll.


    Point of ORDER ...

    Your OP was the TROLL post.


    Wha? Huh?
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,681 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mag00
    quote:Originally posted by mogley98
    I think it has to go as the people in the states voted it.

    Of course if they stole the election I doubt working folks would have time to do a lot of protesting.




    I read that many states have laws that say the elector has to vote as the people voted. Additionally, some states will fine the electors if they don't


    https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/electors.html

    According to the link, apparently only 26 states have laws on the books binding the electors.

    The following link addresses the balance:

    https://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/how-do-different-states-allocate-their-electoral-votes/

    All that said, the electors are selected by the Party that takes the popular vote in that state excepting Nebraska and Maine which use a more Constitutionally based process of proportional representation. In these two states, the winner of the popular vote in the state takes what amounts to the two senate seats. The balance are assigned based upon the popular vote in each Congressional district.

    IMO, the Maine and Nebraska model, with Electors bound by district with the two 'super electors' going with the state-wide popular vote better represents what the founders had in mind and as emphasized in the 12th Amendment. It is instructive to not how the two major parties have usurped this process, and the states of Maine and Nebraska are to be commended for retaining Constitutional proportionality as the rest of the country succumbed to petty party politics in the early 20th century.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • 1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    marc the troll , who would have thunk it ?



    brazilla the troll, everyone knows it , well maybe not [:(]
  • NeoBlackdogNeoBlackdog Member Posts: 17,242 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by 1911a1-fan
    marc the troll , who would have thunk it ?



    brazilla the troll, everyone knows it , well maybe not [:(]

    That would be Marc 1301c...[:D]
  • mag00mag00 Member Posts: 4,719 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
    quote:Originally posted by mag00
    quote:Originally posted by mogley98
    I think it has to go as the people in the states voted it.

    Of course if they stole the election I doubt working folks would have time to do a lot of protesting.




    I read that many states have laws that say the elector has to vote as the people voted. Additionally, some states will fine the electors if they don't


    https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/electors.html

    According to the link, apparently only 26 states have laws on the books binding the electors.

    The following link addresses the balance:

    https://tropicsofmeta.wordpress.com/2013/09/16/how-do-different-states-allocate-their-electoral-votes/

    All that said, the electors are selected by the Party that takes the popular vote in that state excepting Nebraska and Maine which use a more Constitutionally based process of proportional representation. In these two states, the winner of the popular vote in the state takes what amounts to the two senate seats. The balance are assigned based upon the popular vote in each Congressional district.

    IMO, the Maine and Nebraska model, with Electors bound by district with the two 'super electors' going with the state-wide popular vote better represents what the founders had in mind and as emphasized in the 12th Amendment. It is instructive to not how the two major parties have usurped this process, and the states of Maine and Nebraska are to be commended for retaining Constitutional proportionality as the rest of the country succumbed to petty party politics in the early 20th century.



    Let me get this straight, the electors have not been selected prior to the election? And the the DNC or RNC chooses them depending on who won popular vote in that state? But the electors do not have to be residents of the state, but cannot be from the state in which the candidate is from?
  • Marc1301Marc1301 Member Posts: 31,895 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by NeoBlackdog
    quote:Originally posted by 1911a1-fan
    marc the troll , who would have thunk it ?



    brazilla the troll, everyone knows it , well maybe not [:(]

    That would be Marc 1301c...[:D]

    Guess you better teach me to make that copyright sign.[:)]
    Oh well,...it is what it is. I am just going to learn to totally ignore a certain person. There are several others I ignore, shouldn't be hard to add one more.
    "Beam me up Scotty, there's no intelligent life down here." - William Shatner
  • Mr. PerfectMr. Perfect Member, Moderator Posts: 66,404 ******
    edited November -1
    CxfpwGiWEAA55hE.jpg.61838f8e9553724f8e2f274eb9bb29a8.jpg
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    And fiery auto crashes
    Some will die in hot pursuit
    While sifting through my ashes
    Some will fall in love with life
    And drink it from a fountain
    That is pouring like an avalanche
    Coming down the mountain
  • OakieOakie Member Posts: 40,530 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Marc, I just think that things will get worse before they get better. As far as the vote from the electoral college, I think it will stay the course. I know two have over turned their votes, But I don't see a major change. I am one that is not for the electoral college. I would like to see the popular vote count. Too many people vote for one candidate and they count for nothing. Like here in south jersey, The city folk, out way what the country folk feel and vote. I too don't understand the troll of the OP. I thought it was a valid question with no leading answer. JMHO. Oakie
Sign In or Register to comment.