In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Defects in NYPD handguns

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited August 2002 in General Discussion
Defects in NYPD handguns

Half subject to jamming







By BOB KAPPSTATTER and ALICE McQUILLAN
DAILY NEWS STAFF WRITERS
More than half of the Police Department's handguns are subject to jam without warning, a potentially dangerous flaw that can leave the weapons as "useless as paperweights," police sources said.
Although the jamming is rare, the NYPD has been concerned enough to order a recall of 24,000 semiautomatic Glock handguns so they can be refitted.

This problem affects the Glock Model 19S - the gun carried by about 60% of the department's 39,000 officers. The flaw, in which the shell casing fails to eject, has only arisen during practice and tests at the NYPD firing range, police officials say.

"Our studies have shown this to be a rare occurrence," said police spokesman Chief Michael Collins. "In the worst-case scenario...we estimated that this has happened only once in 450,000 times when fired."

However, during an actual gun battle in Brooklyn, two Emergency Service Unit officers reported that their Glocks failed. Collins said that after an investigation of the October 2000 incident, ballistics experts said whatever problem those guns had, it was not the jamming malfunction that is the subject of the current recall.

To correct the problem, the Austrian-based Glock company has sent engineers to the NYPD's firing range at Rodmans Neck in the Bronx. Since June, they have repaired 3,200 weapons in a procedure that takes about an hour. Immediately afterward, officers tested the refitted weapons at the range, where the results have been excellent, Collins said. The process will continue until all 24,000 Glocks are fixed, he said.

There is a delay in fixing all the weapons, sources said, because cutbacks and the redeployment of officers to special details have made it difficult for cops to schedule time to have their guns repaired.

Sources also said that some of the Glocks have a different problem - locking. When a gun locks, a user can get it functioning again by removing the clip holding the ammunition and manually moving the slide to eject the stuck shell casing.

In that scenario, the source said, "You can be back in the gun battle in a matter of seconds, as opposed to the total jam where the guns become [as] useless as paperweights."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/story/12542p-11863c.html

"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Comments

  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    It must be nice though to at least be able to own a firearm to protect you life and your families lives in anti CCW NYC.As long as police officers are kept up on that pedistal in society citizens will keep being slaughtered in the streets.Whoever tells you there is no class system in the USA,just tell them to look at the police,Josey
    BULL'S-EYE ON CHILDREN





    August 20, 2002 -- Are innocent children gunned down in the streets to become a staple of the weekend news cycle?
    The death of 10-year-old Maleny Mendez in The Bronx early Sunday and the wounding hours earlier of 4-year-old Katherine Chrisantos in Brooklyn - both victims of stray bullets - should be cause for concern at City Hall and One Police Plaza.

    They provide further evidence, if such is needed, that guns are returning to the streets of New York.

    Maleny Mendez was shot in the back while trying to flee the gunfire that erupted when a gang of street thugs pushed their way inside the Bronx church where she was attending a christening party.

    Katherine Chrisantos was critically wounded at a birthday party for her 3-year-old cousin by a .38 caliber Derringer someone had brought to the event.

    Actually, last weekend's events should hardly surprise.

    In the first four months of this year, shootings in the city were up by an alarming 22 percent over the same period in 2001. This, even as crime overall continued to decline.

    Mayor Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Ray Kelly responded by initiating a dubious gun buy-back program.

    But the problem is that the bad guys are once again taking out their guns and using them to commit crimes or to simply wage mayhem in general. And the only way to combat that is by strong anti-gun policing.

    In other words, with the now-disbanded Street Crime Unit.

    An improved SCU, anyway - one that is well-trained and tightly supervised. Once the word gets out that the NYPD is aggressively targeting gun-toters again, there will be fewer guns on the streets.

    Thugs will still be thugs, of course - but when was the last time a 10-year-old was killed by a stray knife or boxcutter?

    The alternative is a return to the high-crime, pre-Giuliani era when people were afraid to leave their homes.

    And young children were being slaughtered in the streets.
    http://www.nypost.com/postopinion/editorial/55079.htm

    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • Gordian BladeGordian Blade Member Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I thought Glocks were supposed to be wonder guns?
  • royc38royc38 Member Posts: 2,235 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Your right Gordian. Its a wonder they are called guns. But don't blame the weapon blame the dept for buying their officers the cheapest instead of the best.
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Lets see,the article says they experienced a malfunction once out of 450,00 shots "Our studies have shown this to be a rare occurrence," said police spokesman Chief Michael Collins. "In the worst-case scenario...we estimated that this has happened only once in 450,000 times when fired."

    I wonder what those "Best " guns you mentioned will pull at that rate of fire.


    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • Gordian BladeGordian Blade Member Posts: 1,202 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Sources also said that some of the Glocks have a different problem - locking. When a gun locks, a user can get it functioning again by removing the clip holding the ammunition and manually moving the slide to eject the stuck shell casing.

    In that scenario, the source said, "You can be back in the gun battle in a matter of seconds, as opposed to the total jam where the guns become [as] useless as paperweights."


    The quote above would be funny except that it's deadly serious. Most gunfights are over in a matter of seconds. The great attraction of the Glock was supposed to be that it fires every time you pull the trigger until it's empty, period.

    I don't think the estimate of one problem every 450,000 rounds is a good number. Just instinct for numbers and politics here, not any special knowledge. This must be common enough for the problem to get the public attention it's getting.

    On the second story, it seems to be hard for reporters to understand that there is a serious people problem in most major cities; the "gun" problem is a symptom.
  • William81William81 Member Posts: 25,471 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    A couple of years ago, a medium size city near where I live decided to dump their S&W DAO .40 S&W duty weapons. They were experiencing feeding and ejection problems. A friend of mine that works for the department said the main problem was a lack of proper cleaning and
    an armorer that did not know what he was doing. I understand they are having the same problems with their new duty weapons also.



    Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Liberals....
  • NighthawkNighthawk Member Posts: 12,022 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You cant say for sure but there is a big possibility that some of the Officers are Lemp wristing,or it could be something else.But this is the first time in my almost ten year career.I have heard of a mass of problems with the Glock.Also the NYPD has had to replace alot of their Officers,and they have alot of Rookies with little or no fire arms experience.Most of them also had to be rushed through the Academy,and instructors didnt get to teach until they were satisfied.

    Rugster


    Toujours Pret
  • Shootist3006Shootist3006 Member Posts: 4,171
    edited November -1
    Like-toshoot's math sounds pretty good (As I read this thread, I was thinking of the same argument - beat me to it - darn). I have a different math question 39,000 NYC police and 8,000,000 NTC citizens. That works out to 1 cop for every 333 people and doesn't count all the other police in the city that are not city police (every one from FBI to US Marshals to Postal Inspectors and IRS field agents as well as any county or state agencies) That is a LOT of police per capita!!!!! With that many police, you DO have enough to put a cop on every street corner!!!!

    Quod principi placuit legis habet vigorem.Semper Fidelis
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    It looks like the problems have shown up entirely in practice, and the officers in the firefight were looking to use it as an excuse, but it didn't fly.

    Any mechanical device will experience wear with extended use. The guns are being refitted despite the fact that very few have failed, in order for Glock to pro-actively assure quality control for the guns in the field. Ask the car companies to fix problems on a just in case basis -- they don't do a recall until lots of critical failures have already occurred and people are maimed and killed.

    This is an easy one to jump on but the criticism, while it may be fun for Glock detractors, is bogus, particularly when compared to the record of any other handgun. They're as good, or better, in terms of the "Consumer Reports" style of years-in-the-field record for repairs.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Although there are many here who dislike the Glocks, for whatever reasons, I'm very happy with mine. It's been as reliable as I could ask, with the exception of a single case failure which I believe was the fault of the ammo (& the design of the Glock chamber). That said, when I reach for a carry gun, 95 times out of 100, it is a wheelgun. Never had a jam in a revolver. Never had a failure to feed, etc. From my perspective, absolute functional reliability in any situation where my life may be on the line is far more important than having eight to twenty rounds of ammo available. Doesn't mean I have a problem with someone else having them nor that I don't own / use hi-cap semi-autos myself, just that my confidence in my handgun is near absolute with the simple old revolver. And if I were a NYPD officer or any other LEO I would be raising holy hell if my mandated sidearm was as unreliable as these seem to be. I also think I could find time to go to the range and have the problem corrected no matter how heavy my duty schedule!!!!!!!
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    LTS,thems is Brady Bunch numbers you are figuring.Nowhere does it mention anything about the 24000 being reworked ever having had a missfire,if anything it seems to be preventative maintenance which of course is something every firearm should go through eventually(probably more often than not depending on the owners' personal gun care habits).It even states "Although the jamming is rare, the NYPD has been concerned enough to order a recall of 24,000 semiautomatic Glock handguns so they can be refitted".LEO issue guns are passed around to so many different people that I have no doubt that the need for preventative maintenance is greater.Again,1 missfire or jam for 450000 rounds stacks up against most any major firearm manufacturer I'd bet

    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • j2k22j2k22 Member Posts: 329 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    second to the "limp wristing" explanation. Poorly trained and scared under fire, failed to hold the (double stack) Tupperware firmly.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    "....and it's not because there are more of them in service either."

    Ooooooo-kay....

    Preventive maintenance is preventive maintenance. If they recalled only those guns that misfired, they would have sent back about 1/1,000th of the number or less. It's clear Glock is being a good corporate citizen here. Since they recalled 24,000, they are upgrading these guns despite a lack of failures.

    Don't forget that 1911s and Hi-Powers once started the phrase "jam-o-matic," and used to draw blood by firing, before the engineers got ahold of them and made decades-long little improvements on the guns. Hi-Power mags used to be loaded one round less than maximum to keep them operating properly. Ejection ports had to be relieved. Gun traditionalists freaked over Glocks because they were great new guns, not because they were perfect new guns. Now the traditionalists want to say we presented them as perfect, but we never did. You say tupperware, I say jam-o-matic. It's all the same, and equally bogus when your gun is in good shape. And equally true when it isn't, I suppose.

    The great thing about what Glock is doing is that they are no doubt getting the opportunity to strengthen a design point, which will become part of the new manufacturing process, before large numbers are killed by a flaw in older guns that went un-addressed. My guess is that anybody with a Glock that wants a retro-fit will get one. Last time I sent my gun back to Glock, they corrected a misinstalled New York trigger at no charge, even though it was the dealer's fault.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • TxsTxs Member Posts: 17,809 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Due to this article being so vaguely written, I'm still trying to figure out what's going on here.

    In the first scenario they say the guns "jam", describing this as a failure to eject. They go on to say this problem renders the pistol completely inoperative and infer that it takes an extended period of time to get it up and running. Whatever is happening here, it sounds like the pistol has to be field stripped or disassembled to clear it. That's a serious failure.

    In the second scenario they say the pistols "lock". This isn't further described, other than to say it's also a failure to eject. They say it's not near as big an issue as the first scenario because all that's required is for the shooter to remove the magazine and manually cycle the slide to clear the weapon. As malfunctions go, that's pretty serious.

    Whatever is causing these problems, they say it takes a factory
    "engineer" an hour per gun to make the proper repairs. A Glock pistol can be entirely rebuilt in less time than this, so whatever is wrong with them must be pretty bad.

    The article then says it wasn't either of these scenarios that caused the malfunction of two ESU officer's pistols during a firefight, but fail to say if these were due to weapon problems. Taking into account that these are some of the most most highly trained officers in NYPD, two malfunctions due to operater error in the same incident wouldn't seem likely.

    I'm curious about what's going on with their pistols up there.
  • CWatsonCWatson Member Posts: 964 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Bought a my first Glock19 in 1991.Except a six month period were I couldn't go to the range.I took it to the range once a month.it is the only gun I take on every range trip.That is 122 months and put between 150-250 rds each time I go.Even at the minimum amount of 150 rds x 122 months=18,300 rounds.Never used reloads and only factory Glock mags.The finish on the slide is worn some now.One fail to feed about two years ago,a CCI blaze that had a fat case that was to large to fit in chamber.However once I tried to teach my wife who shoots a revolver fine to use a auto and the slide action snapping back kept making her flinch.In that one session two jams in five minutes .She stopped trying, I shot it more that session and no jams on me.Can limp wristing and flinching be the cause?,it looks that way to me.Could the problem be more pronounced with the heavier New York trigger?It would be nice to know what the refit is,lighter trigger spring?An hour?Times are slow is NYC is being charged to refit the guns and not Glock absorbing the cost?By the way I not a Glock fanatic,I bought it to retire my Colt Goverment,and couldn't afford another Colt.I use power tools all the time and appreciate tools that function without trouble,and the Glock has always been that for me.If anyone finds out the details of refit please post.CW

    A near miss is still a miss!

    Wasn't me(you?).......!
  • v35v35 Member Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    My G19 was purchased new in 1987. It produced one failure last year after installing the latest recoil spring assembly which was promptly removed.
    Today, while shooting the G19 left (weak) handed for the first time, one case ejected in my lap. After tightening my grip, the casings ejected 5 feet further. I've never experienced limp wristed problems before and it is a concern over a pistol that has been entirely reliable. The ammo was 115gr full power handloads.
  • UNIVERSITY50UNIVERSITY50 Member Posts: 1,705 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    the first issue is the empty is not ejecting and the new round is trying to be loaded and jams it's nose in the base of the empty. the second is a short cycle stove pipe of the empty, which is way the mag is dropped down so when you rack the slide back the clear the empty it does not cause the first problem. one of the problems with new york's guns is dirty ejector!!! the fit is tight and the ejectors are freezing open from dirt, rust, etc.. poor preventive maint. these guys are not cleaning the gun right and/or enough. the way the gun is carried is some of the problem, exposed to the weather and dirt of the city in those crappy holsters, but it still comes down to poor maint. of the equip.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The weird thing is that if they're shooting these enough to get them that dirty, cleaning at the end of the session should be a built-in part of the drill. All this dirt can't be coming from shootings in the line of duty. I'd like to know more about it too.

    Of course all you have to do to get a Glock to lock after every shot is install the New York trigger bar upside-down. It's made that way so it can be used to train new recruits one round at a time. Don't tell me their armorer has got some of them put together wrong... But it's not impossible. Could even be that they bought cheap leather holsters which are shedding rawhide particles into the gun around the port, I suppose. Until we know more, it's hard to say. Bad ammo could certainly cause these problems too.

    As for limp-wristing, this has been a characteristic of the guns since they came out. You can't limp wrist a Glock and not expect failures to cycle properly. If the wife gets problems and you don't, that certainly what the problem must be. This by the way is why it took so long to get titanium into gun frames. Titanium has some elasticity too, I hear.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I dated a girl in NYC once and encountered the NYPD on many occasions while walking down the street. The NYPD is comprised of fine individuals who do a job in a city where I would hate to live. However, they are a virtual army of underpaid individuals. Based on what I have seen they probably aren't the most highly trained police department when it comes down to the average officer. There are so many officers on the street today who have no clue how to maintain a firearm. They know enough to load it and pull the trigger. I am not saying that this is the case with every NYPD officer but I have a hard time believing that the entire NYPD gets all the top-notch firearms training available simply due to the sheer size of the force and the relatively low funding for the force. The Glock is simple and it is a very reliable firearm. However, you have to know how to operate it. Limp-wristing is most likely the cause of the problems mentioned here. Couple that with maintenance issues and you have a recipe for disaster. I know that, back in 1996, the NYPD was starting officers out at around $28K/year. That is below poverty level when you consider the cost of living in NYC. I know security guards that do better than that. How is the NYPD supposed to attract the best and the brightest at that wage?

    Glocks are one of those guns that you either love or hate. This article does nothing to explain the cause of the problems mentioned. It is written in a manner that those who love the Glock will be quick to blame the NYPD and those that hate it will blame the gun. You obviously know my opinion on the matter.



    Edited by - idsman75 on 08/23/2002 03:07:16
Sign In or Register to comment.