In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

NYC Firefighter's memorial update

RedlegRedleg Member Posts: 417 ✭✭✭
edited January 2002 in General Discussion
Claim: A memorial to New York City firefighters will be rendered in a historically inaccurate way.Status: Was true, but not anymore. Origins: This photograph of Dan McWilliams, George Johnson, and Billy Eisengrein raising a flag on a pole anchored in about 20 feet of rubble at the World Trade Center touched us in a way comparable to how the famed picture of the Iwo Jima flag-raising stirred our parents' and grandparents' hearts in World War II. A rendition of it cast in bronze was planned as a memorial to the hundreds of New York City firefighters who lost their lives on September 11. It was to have been placed in front of fire headquarters at the MetroTech Center in Brooklyn. The controversial memorial would not have been historically accurate, however, as two of the three firefighters who raised the flag that day were to be restyled as Hispanic and black figures in the 19-foot, $180,000 statue. The * features of the actual firefighters were not going to be used -- the artists had selected three professional models to pose for the piece, and the clay model unveiled in December 2001 reflected their interpretation of the famous Thomas E. Franklin photo. The New York Fire Department initially defended the proposed statue design, saying it accurately represented the 343 department members killed in the attacks. "Ultimately, a decision was made to honor no one in particular but everyone who made the supreme sacrifice," said Frank Gribbon, a spokesman for the FDNY. The "accuracy" of that representation was questionable: only 2.7% of the city's 11,495 firefighters are black, and 3.2% are Hispanic. Twelve of the 343 firefighters who died were black, and twelve were Hispanic. Even while still in the planning stages, the memorial was already controversial. Those who viewed it as a monument to self-sacrifice embraced the racial adjustment, because to their minds the finished statue would better impart the message of everyone's striving together. Those who held that momuments and memorials to actual events and real people should be historically accurate rather than idealized versions were outraged by the proposed alteration. (It should be pointed out that this is far from the first instance of art playing fast and loose with racial history. Countless World War II films depict black and white American soldiers fighting side by side, yet black soldiers were restricted to service support organizations and a few separate combat units during the war, and the army remained segregated until President Truman issued an executive order ending the practice in 1948, three years after the end of the war.) The firestorm of public opinion resulted in the statue's donor, developer Bruce Ratner, scrapping plans for this particular testimonial to heroism.

Comments

Sign In or Register to comment.