In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Can a bullet bring down an airliner?

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited February 2002 in General Discussion
Can a bullet bring down an airliner?Chances of gunfire decompressing cabin 'virtually nil'
Posted: February 15, 20021:00 a.m. EasternBy Jon Doughertyc 2002 WorldNetDaily.com Hollywood has conditioned many Americans to believe that even at extreme altitudes, one bullet hole through the skin of a commercial airplane is enough to cause a massive pressurized explosion with enough force to suck passengers and debris into the cold air outside. But as the debate continues over whether to allow commercial airline pilots, crew and perhaps even passengers carry firearms during flights, aeronautical engineers and other aircraft experts are working hard to educate the public about the realities of cabin pressure, bullets and aircraft vulnerabilities. In short, they say, don't believe everything you see on TV. As Dave Kopel, research director of the Independence Institute, said in a National Review column just days following the Sept. 11 attacks, Hollywood usually fails to "teach real-life lessons about physics." "There is only one known instance in which a bullet hole in an aircraft frame yanked objects across the plane, expanded and sucked a person out into the sky. That was the James Bond movie 'Goldfinger,'" he said. In a follow-up story, Kopel said, "The risk of a stray bullet creating a decompression that could cause a crash, which I'd reported to be virtually nil, is apparently even less than that." Quoting retired Air Force Gen. James Chambers, Kopel points out that the Air Force has plenty of pressurized planes, such as AWACS, which are able to sustain penetration or damage from bullets from enemy fighter-jet machine guns. "The general said that the worst case would simply require a plane flying at an altitude of about 30,000 feet to hurry down to lower altitudes. If the plane were above 30,000 feet, there would probably be enough breathable air for the pilots to maintain consciousness, even without the air masks," which fall from overhead compartments in the event of a sudden decompression in the cabin, Kopel said. Aircraft engineers agree the risk of catastrophe caused by a bullet hole at altitude is low. "First of all, there already is a 'hole' in the aircraft, for regulating the cabin pressure," says 20-year aircraft engineer Dan Todd. "It's called the outflow valve. It modulates to maintain desired cabin pressure in response to signals from a cabin pressure controller, which responds to inputs from a selector panel in the cockpit - all automatic when it's all working normally." He added that there is always pressurized leaking past door seals and a few other compartments. "Remember, the airplane is pressurized by a constant flow of compressed air into the cabin from the engines - via the pneumatic systems and the air conditioning systems," he said. "If one round, or two or three for that matter pierce the skin, it's not necessarily catastrophic; air will go whistling out the hole, and the outflow valve will close a little further to maintain the desired cabin pressure." Historians also point out what B-17 pilots and aircrews during World War II knew all too well - that even at altitude and full of bullet and flak holes, those planes were legendary for staying aloft. Besides the realities of pressurized commercial air carriers and the physics involved, firearm technology also can play a part in reducing unintended consequences of firing a shot in-flight. Armed air marshals, since the 1970s, carried Glaser Safety Slug ammunition, which is a high-velocity handgun ammunition containing birdshot or "dust shot." It fragments when fired and has extremely low penetrability. Debate over whether to allow pilots to carry guns comes as the Federal Aviation Administration closed its public comment period on the issue. As WorldNetDaily reported, the agency, which opened its comment period Dec. 31, has sought the public's input about how to craft regulations that would permit pilots and other commercial airline crew members to carry firearms and less-than-lethal weapons as a way to beef up in-flight security. http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=26481

Comments

  • jonkjonk Member Posts: 10,121
    edited November -1
    It couldn't bring down the plane from a stray cabin shot, but if some idiot loaded with armor piercing and managed to get into the hold, I imagine it could do enough damage to fuel, electrical, hydraulic, and other systems that it would crash.
    "...hit your enemy in the belly, and kick him when he is down, and boil his prisoners in oil- if you take any- and torture his women and children. Then people will keep clear of you..." -Admiral of the Fleet Lord Fisher, speaking at the Hague Peace Conference in 1899.
  • v35v35 Member Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    B29 bombers were pressurized and took plenty of hits from Japanese fighters during WW2. There has to be data on this.I would worry about a powerful bullet striking the outer skin obliquely,creating a * rather than a small hole.
  • gunluv280gunluv280 Member Posts: 178 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have a hard time believing a bullet could bring down an airliner. Even if you had AP rounds, you'd have to know exactly what to hit, and be able to do so. A terrorist would have to be pretty familiar with aircraft to know how to take one down with small arms--and I don't give the dumb sons-of-bitches much credit in the intelligence department. If they were smart, they'd find more productive ways to spend their time in the first place.Most of the electrical and hydraulic systems on an airliner could sustain some damage and not be completely disabled. I believe most of them have at least some redundancy, so you'd have to take out more than one system to disable the aircraft. Let's not forget, there aren't a lot of hydraulic or electrical lines visible from the passenger compartment.This being said, I think arming pilots would be a good idea. Passengers too. I think there's less danger of the aircraft going down from a stray bullet or two than from letting some pea-brained terrorist getting into the cockpit. If you kill him, he probably won't be able to harm any of the aircraft's critical systems.
  • gunluv280gunluv280 Member Posts: 178 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I almost forgot....I remember one of those catastrophe movies from the 70's.....think it was Airport '77 where a 747 crashed into the ocean and sank to the bottom where the passengers spent several nerve-wracking hours before being rescued. If a 747 can withstand that, it can sure as hell take a few rounds from a handgun!
  • Hans GrueberHans Grueber Member Posts: 244 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Flyin lead has brought about many technological feats, why not one more huh?
  • marshdogmarshdog Member Posts: 10 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Having spent 20 years in aircraft and helicopter maintenance the short answer is "yes" a single round could bring down an airliner. Having said that let me expand, it would have to be a lucky (or unlucky) shot to do it. If the round simply pierced the skin "no," aircraft routinely loose fasteners (bolts/screws) and because of the volume of air introduced into the cabin it doesn't mean much BUT does have an effect when added together with other leak sources. The yes answer is best illustrated by asking could you cause a car to explode by shooting a single projectile into it? The answer is yes, but how many cars are shot everyday and how many explode?
  • BullzeyeBullzeye Member Posts: 3,560
    edited November -1
    Those frangible rounds have just about jack for penetration, like they said.A Tango could probably wear a Kevlar vest under a jacket through a metal detector and not be noticed, as it contains no metal.Even a very light vest would easily stop a frangible bullet, though. They're designed to completely shatter on impact with lightweight plastic.I dont know if a headshot would work, either. Wouldnt it disintegrate on the guy's skullbone?Something for those air marshalls to consider...
Sign In or Register to comment.