In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

5 W's of George W. Bush

bradf111bradf111 Member Posts: 74 ✭✭
edited September 2001 in General Discussion
WHO: Don't quite know yet.What: Lead the world in victory over terrorism.WHEN: Not quite sure, but give us all a minute to think about when the time will be RIGHT.WHERE: Don't know yet, but when we find out who maybe where will become more clear.WHY: It's the "focus of my administration".HOW: Lead pep rallies with our allies and encourage everyone to "fight team fight" because we are right.

Comments

  • LowriderLowrider Member Posts: 6,587
    edited November -1
    Well, it's a tough job cleaning up the mess left by Klinton and his gang of liberal, politically-correct pukes.Speaking of Klinton, I see he managed to get his mug on TV tonight, with the New York rubble pile as a backdrop.That guy can sniff out a camera faster than Jesse Jackson.Now isn't the time to be badmouthing the U.S. President.
  • bradf111bradf111 Member Posts: 74 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Anytime is the right time. Drugs and alcoholmake the 5w's hard to remember.
  • Homer J SimpsonHomer J Simpson Member Posts: 89 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Brad, who's side are you on?Remember, there is a fine line between being clever, and being stupid. I'm giving you the benifit of the doubt.
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Word on the street is that Klinton was wandering the streets comforting wives of the missing---HONESTLY!
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    bradf111,If you don't like it, why don't you go live with the Afghanistans? If your not part of the solution, your part of the problem!
    GUN CONTROL: If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm not in as charitable a mood as Homer. I for one would rather be led by a MAN who has to fight back tears in talking about the deaths of innocent children than a walking photo op. Somehow, I think OBL would rather have it the other way.
  • bradf111bradf111 Member Posts: 74 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Slow down Kimberkid,The original post only asks WHO are you going to lash out at etc. Not with blind hate but with correct information and purpose. Until badguys PROVEN to be the right badguys we had better lay off all the chest thumping and get it straight. These are all the same badguys that Tim M. made people look stupid about. We can't get fooled again.When proven through correct information gathering procedures (5W's) then all Hell should break loose.
  • kimberkidkimberkid Member Posts: 8,858 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    bradf111,Thanks for the clarification, my misunderstanding. Of course you are correct ... I think its more than a little frustrating (but not supprising) that no one is claiming responcibility.On the up side American Pride is shining brighter than ever!
    GUN CONTROL: If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!kimberkid@gunbroker.zzn.com
    If you really desire something, you'll find a way ?
    ? otherwise, you'll find an excuse.
  • nordnord Member Posts: 6,106
    edited November -1
    As to your initial remarks re. our president...I've seen the man on television since the start of this tragedy. I'm impressed that he hasn't gone for publicity mugs as has his spineless predecessor. I'm impressed with the fact that the man shows real emotions and is willing to share them with the nation.I'm most impressed with our presidents' delivery... No pompous words, no threats, only a promise. If I were in the terrorism business I'd be very fearful right now. Anyone that studies human nature will tell you that a cool, calculating enemy that has drawn the "line in the sand" and will not relent is much more dangerous than an enemy that is all threat and bluster. As to the specifics of your post:Who? - It's best we not make that information public as it's not smart to inform an enemy that we're coming.What? - The job of the president is to lead. No polls, no papers, no backtracking... Mr. Bush is doing his job.When? - See answer 1.Why? - Only a fool would have to ask.How? - By any and all means available to us. By the elimination of all who contribute to the support of terrorists in any way. By the total withdrawl of support to those animals who could go out on the street and cheer a disaster perpretrated on innocents. By a declaration to all that henceforth our diplomacy will take on a new form... Instead of being worried about the rights of others, the United States will worry more about our own. While still being polite, we don't anymore ask... We tell!
  • redcedarsredcedars Member Posts: 919 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Brad, I see you have made several posts critical of President Bush, all with references to alcohol and drugs.You are perfectly entitled to your opinion, and I am happy we both live in a country where you have a LEGAL right to state it publicly (although you are permitted to do so on these boards soley at the discretion of the ownership).Just because you have a LEGAL right to say whatever doen't make it either wise, appropriate or morally right to do so. During this time of crisis we need to unite behind the President and present a united front to the world. Your petty criticisms, which sound like nothing more than the sour grapes of a Gore-Klintonista, are particularly inappropriate. Having said that, let me also say that I just bet that you are not spewing this bilgewater down at the local tavern or hardware store, where there is no computer bulletin board to hide behind. I just bet you aren't making your snide remarks where other folks can hear you, see you and reach you. The right to free speech aside, we all know what kind of response you will get on the streets of America today. Right about now, there are a whole lot of folks out here with a whole lot of rage we are trying to contain so we can direct it at the right people. It seems to me it would be particularly unwise to exercise your first amendment rights by making debasing and derogatory statements about the President in a truly public forum, like the town square. I am sure you know that, and confine your nasty, petty crap to bulletin boards and so forth.Think I'm wrong? Then I suggest you prove it by getting someone to videotape you repeating the garbage you have posted in any public place where folks can overhear you except a church. If you don't have any friends, I'm sure we can find a volunteer cameraman in your neighborhood. Hell, I'll contribute to a fund to pay for a professional cameraman. It would be worth seeing. redcedars
  • bradf111bradf111 Member Posts: 74 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    redceders,Just like you shouted my right to express howI and others, yes others feel.As to the public expression, that is where I said these statements first. If you will note time of posts I had come home from a town meeting where others had also expressedtheir feelings. Many are also laughing at the immediate chest thumping by others like yourself. Many want not to be fooled again, especially by one of the gun crowd. As in TimM. who let everyone thump their chests about tearing into the wrong people without All the FACTS first. If the facts prove out the people behind this act bt all means possible we need to squash them like bugs! But we better be sure of the bugs and squash them ALL. Not a half*ssed job as in Sadham (sp).As for Bush, he is again stepping up to the plate for big business in this matter. Remember that if this gets declared "an act of war" take a look at your own insurance policies and read the exclusions section for non-payment of claims. "Acts of war" void payment of claims. That will free the insurance companies from paying claims to the real injured people in this case. I sure hope that Bush doesn't have this as his hidden agenda.
  • jdchasejdchase Member Posts: 44 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Awright Monkey, is that you?
    "Don't mean nuthin..." http://members.spree.com/jdchase/
  • .280 freak.280 freak Member Posts: 1,942 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Brad -The insurance companies are already on record stating that the "Act of War" clause not applicable in this case. Move on. "Hidden agenda"??? Yeah I'm pretty sure Bush set this all up. Sheesh.
  • redcedarsredcedars Member Posts: 919 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Brad:I don't think I have been doing any "chest-thumping", but maybe you have a different definition. You know, it could depend on what the meaning of the word "is" is.As for the rest of your most recent post, it is mostly bovine excrement. I don't know what you mean by "fooled again" by one of the "gun crowd", but I'm not going to waste any more time trying to make sense of the nonsensical.And if you read my posts, you will see that while I certainly believe that these horrors have bin Laden's fingerprints all over them, I have also said we must make certain the identities of the guilty parties, so that is a bogus criticism on your part.I don't believe you publicly voiced 1/10 of the crap you have posted on these boards anywhere. For example I don't believe you voiced any of your drugs and alcohol crap, or any suggestion that the President is currently acting out of ulterior motives to benefit big business. In fact, I find it incomprehensible that anyone in this country who does not suffer from a mental disease or defect could even suggest the latter.Once again I urge you to repeat the things you have posted here, publicly, and in front of a video camera so the rest of us can see the fun.I also suggest you go back to Ronald McDonald and complain, because you are obviously a few french fries short of a Happy Meal.redcedars
  • Free N TXFree N TX Member Posts: 165 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Brad, I sincerely doubt that Pres. Bush is thinking about insurance claims. When he called it an act of war, he was right. No true national leader would say, "Wait a minute, if we call it an act of war then insurance companies won't have to pay off...Let me check to see if I have any stock in an insurance company or are the insurance companies going to give me a "private donation"." Now if Klinton were still in office that might be another story. He would probably call the insurance company himself to see how much they would pay him to say it was an act of war. (Yep, I still hate the Klintons, because they are crooked and dishonest and dragged the highest office in this country through the mud).One other note about the president, have you seen the way he is not using a pre-written script every time he is on TV. He is saying what he feels in his heart when he is talking about the victims and their families. When did you ever see Klinton on the TV without a pre-written script, and he always stayed with the script, never did he "talk" about anything that wasn't written by professionals for him.I, for one, am glad and proud to have a President like Bush and will follow his lead.
  • PelicanPelican Member Posts: 1,061 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    'peers we has a liberal democrat amongst us.
    "Audemus jura nostra defendere"- - - - - - - - - - - - - It is useless to hold a person accountable for anything they say while in love, drunk, or running for office.
  • 218Beekeep218Beekeep Member Posts: 3,033
    edited November -1
    We can`t post on the VEGAN board ,but it looks like we have a VEGAN posting here.
    Will the last reb to leave flarda,please bring the flag?
  • beachmaster73beachmaster73 Member Posts: 3,011 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    218Beekeep.....roflmao. Good on you mate!! Beach
Sign In or Register to comment.