In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
May Be The Answer???
pwillie
Member Posts: 20,253 ✭✭✭
Read this....
Sometimes, at a most solemn moment, a most irreverent thought shoots through the mind. When I heard that the US Supreme Court legalized happy marriage, my thought was "I wonder what the estate tax lawyers will make of it?" How about advising a terminally ill widowed grandma to marry her much-beloved granddaughter at the deathbed? Won't the estate pass to the surviving spouse intact? I'm not a lawyer, but I think it will -- without IRS getting the bite out of it as would happen now. And it would be very hard to have a sound legal argument against such marriage. Isn't it born out of love? Absolutely. But doesn't it go against the prohibition of marriage with a blood relative? But this prohibition is rooted merely in the very same authority that also prohibits the same-sex union, and hence could survive judicial review if litigation results.
The law of unintended consequences may work to surprising effect. The very people who are today repelled by the court's decision may come to embrace it as a tool of keeping their wealth in the family; the government that is now elated with the court's decision, may yet come to rue it when US Treasury's estate tax revenue dwindles.
It's a brave new world out there. One wonders how the lawyers will navigate and harness it.
Sometimes, at a most solemn moment, a most irreverent thought shoots through the mind. When I heard that the US Supreme Court legalized happy marriage, my thought was "I wonder what the estate tax lawyers will make of it?" How about advising a terminally ill widowed grandma to marry her much-beloved granddaughter at the deathbed? Won't the estate pass to the surviving spouse intact? I'm not a lawyer, but I think it will -- without IRS getting the bite out of it as would happen now. And it would be very hard to have a sound legal argument against such marriage. Isn't it born out of love? Absolutely. But doesn't it go against the prohibition of marriage with a blood relative? But this prohibition is rooted merely in the very same authority that also prohibits the same-sex union, and hence could survive judicial review if litigation results.
The law of unintended consequences may work to surprising effect. The very people who are today repelled by the court's decision may come to embrace it as a tool of keeping their wealth in the family; the government that is now elated with the court's decision, may yet come to rue it when US Treasury's estate tax revenue dwindles.
It's a brave new world out there. One wonders how the lawyers will navigate and harness it.
Comments
So will grandma get some of that grand daughter to consumate the "marriage"? And andrewsw16 even this act isn't worthy of Jerry Springer moment.
Is there a legal requirement to "consumate"? I don't think so, just the appropriate signatures on a Marriage license.
Example: Some old timer is hard up but sells a marriage to a person who can than draw Survivor benefits on the geezers SS, Retirement or Healthcare.
If he/she was say 88 and dying but someone promised to give his/her grandkid 10K for college if he/she would marry them making them eligible for potentially tens of thousands of SS payments? Or maybe he has a retirement that can transfer to a spouse? Or healthcare?
so at least some of the vets had a ( hopefully ) swell time late in life or living like old Heff at the mansion