In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options
CP: How to Influence Public Opinion in US
HAIRY
Member Posts: 23,606
Home Site Guide Contact Us Set As HomePage Add to favorites
Jewish settlement removal a 'big lie'
By Khalid Amayreh in the West Bank
Wednesday 31 March 2004, 12:08 Makka Time, 9:08 GMT
Palestinians have dismissed Israeli claims that it dismantled a Jewish settlement near the occupied West Bank city of Hebron as a "big lie".
The Israeli army said on Wednesday it removed an uninhabited settlement near the Jewish outpost of Kiryat Arba next to Hebron.
Under international law, all Jewish settlements are illegal, a stance not recognised by Israel.
Israeli media quoted Jewish settler leaders in Hebron as accusing the army of "destroying a synagogue and targeting Jewish presence in this area".
"This obviously is a big lie," Abd al-Hadi Hantash, a Hebron municipal official and expert on Jewish settlements in the West Bank, told Aljazeera.net.
"It seems to me that [Israeli Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon wants to give an impression that he is dismantling settlements ahead of his planned visit to Washington.
"In fact, we are talking about the removal of a tent and two secondhand mobile homes from a hilltop south of Kiryat Arba. In any case, the settlers will move them back on to the same site tomorrow or after tomorrow after the whole world got the impression that a settlement had been dismantled. "It is a cynical public relations game, nothing more than that."
However, Hantash said the Israeli army coordinates with settlers.
"Israel claims to be a state of law. But how come a state of law allows the building of so many illegal settlements on usurped land belonging to Arab villagers?
"And why does the army pave roads to these outposts and give them water and electricity. The army and the settlers are two sides of the same coin."
Even before the army hauled the two mobile homes away from the hilltop overlooking the Hebron-Bani Naim road, die-hard settlers in the area converged on the site to protest and try to block the removal of the tent.
Kiryat Arba mayor Zvi Katzover accused the army of destroying "a synagogue", an apparent reference to the dismantled tent in which the settlers occasionally held their prayer. "We will do all we can to rebuild the outpost and save the country," he said.
Meanwhile, rampaging Jewish settlers raided and seized a multi-storey Arab building in the Silwan neighbourhood of occupied Arab East Jerusalem early on Wednesday, sparking clashes with local Palestinian youths.
Israeli police forces fired rubber bullets and tear gas at the Palestinians. Medical sources in East Jerusalem said at least three Palestinians were injured.
It is not clear if the incident is connected with the removal of the two mobile homes near Hebron.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that the seizure of the building might have been intended as a protest against what happened in Hebron. But it could also be an attempt by Jewish settler groups to confiscate yet more Arab-owned real estate.
Many of the settlers are affiliated with an extremist group, Oteret Cohanim, dedicated to ridding Jerusalem of all non-Jews.
Palestinian leaders in East Jerusalem say the recurrent seizure of Arab property is carried out through deception, falsification of documents and outright bullying, sometimes with government support.
There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.
Don't assume malice for what stupidity can explain.
Jewish settlement removal a 'big lie'
By Khalid Amayreh in the West Bank
Wednesday 31 March 2004, 12:08 Makka Time, 9:08 GMT
Palestinians have dismissed Israeli claims that it dismantled a Jewish settlement near the occupied West Bank city of Hebron as a "big lie".
The Israeli army said on Wednesday it removed an uninhabited settlement near the Jewish outpost of Kiryat Arba next to Hebron.
Under international law, all Jewish settlements are illegal, a stance not recognised by Israel.
Israeli media quoted Jewish settler leaders in Hebron as accusing the army of "destroying a synagogue and targeting Jewish presence in this area".
"This obviously is a big lie," Abd al-Hadi Hantash, a Hebron municipal official and expert on Jewish settlements in the West Bank, told Aljazeera.net.
"It seems to me that [Israeli Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon wants to give an impression that he is dismantling settlements ahead of his planned visit to Washington.
"In fact, we are talking about the removal of a tent and two secondhand mobile homes from a hilltop south of Kiryat Arba. In any case, the settlers will move them back on to the same site tomorrow or after tomorrow after the whole world got the impression that a settlement had been dismantled. "It is a cynical public relations game, nothing more than that."
However, Hantash said the Israeli army coordinates with settlers.
"Israel claims to be a state of law. But how come a state of law allows the building of so many illegal settlements on usurped land belonging to Arab villagers?
"And why does the army pave roads to these outposts and give them water and electricity. The army and the settlers are two sides of the same coin."
Even before the army hauled the two mobile homes away from the hilltop overlooking the Hebron-Bani Naim road, die-hard settlers in the area converged on the site to protest and try to block the removal of the tent.
Kiryat Arba mayor Zvi Katzover accused the army of destroying "a synagogue", an apparent reference to the dismantled tent in which the settlers occasionally held their prayer. "We will do all we can to rebuild the outpost and save the country," he said.
Meanwhile, rampaging Jewish settlers raided and seized a multi-storey Arab building in the Silwan neighbourhood of occupied Arab East Jerusalem early on Wednesday, sparking clashes with local Palestinian youths.
Israeli police forces fired rubber bullets and tear gas at the Palestinians. Medical sources in East Jerusalem said at least three Palestinians were injured.
It is not clear if the incident is connected with the removal of the two mobile homes near Hebron.
The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that the seizure of the building might have been intended as a protest against what happened in Hebron. But it could also be an attempt by Jewish settler groups to confiscate yet more Arab-owned real estate.
Many of the settlers are affiliated with an extremist group, Oteret Cohanim, dedicated to ridding Jerusalem of all non-Jews.
Palestinian leaders in East Jerusalem say the recurrent seizure of Arab property is carried out through deception, falsification of documents and outright bullying, sometimes with government support.
There is always one more imbecile than you counted on.
Don't assume malice for what stupidity can explain.
Comments
As I stated in another post... A state (any state) will do what's best for its own purposes. Israel will act in its own best interest. Jordan will do the same... and Syria, and Saudi Arabia, and Egypt, and, and ,and! Don't expect morality among these entities as it can't exist!
Canada and the US are "friends" because we share a common history and a common border and common interests... And we're one hell of a lot bigger and badder than they. If we were on equal terms, then things might be different.
England is much the same. Many things in common and the US is convenient should there come problems. Our relationship has served both sides and continues to do so. Our relationship will last as long as a mutual need exists.
China... We don't like each other all that much. They have nukes pointed in our direction and they sometimes threaten US interests in Asia. Still, they like our technology. They like our products. And their value as a trading "partner" is on the rise. As long as the relationship continues to benefit both states, then we'll avoid conflict.
While it appears that you feel the need to present a non Jewish opinion, Hairy, I think your efforts are futile. Our state (US) has little to gain by siding with Palastinians who hate our culture. We have much more to gain by assisting a country who is not our friend, but who bears us no ill will.
Fact is, we should probably base more of our decisions on common interests and less on the false perception that we might be liked or disliked by another nation.
But that's just my opinion.
Nord