In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

WoW Social Security up 0.3% for 2017

droptopdroptop Member Posts: 8,363 ✭✭
edited November 2016 in General Discussion
Excited !!! won't sleep well thinking about buying lots of neat "stuff". celebrate01.gif

https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/colafacts2017.pdf

Comments

  • TooBigTooBig Member Posts: 28,559 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Just the way democraps want it and keeping the poor on the plantations
  • mrshortymrshorty Member Posts: 110
    edited November -1
    That's a slap in the face for all who worked to earn social security
    dan
  • spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 37,717 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    to add INSULT to injury read what our elected(and families) recieve in salaries and LIFETIME benefits and medical compared to the TAXPAYER
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,681 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Those that retired in 2010 are the first that, on average, will receive less than what they paid into the system. The difference will increase with every succeeding year.

    SS is not a retirement plan, it is an entitlement insurance plan that has been politically manipulated to buy votes from those that want as much as or more than what they put in.

    Yes, most of us will receive less than we contributed. When one considers the fact that the program is taking in much less than it is paying out, it is kind of silly to raise the payout amount at all.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • chiefrchiefr Member Posts: 14,105 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You can gain a huge pay raise by eliminating the income tax on Social
    Security.

    Yes they tax Social Security and it was the party that professes saving SS that gave you the tax: DEMOCRATs
  • Hunter MagHunter Mag Member Posts: 6,610 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    But Don the SS system would have plenty of $$$ if the government didn't spend it when the system was solvent.
    Did you know the $255 death benefit hasn't been increased since 1941.
    But the cronies, crooks and criminals I mean politicians don't have to worry about this because they're exempt from it.
    The SS system is just for us peasants.[B)]
  • droptopdroptop Member Posts: 8,363 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Don McManus
    Those that retired in 2010 are the first that, on average, will receive less than what they paid into the system. The difference will increase with every succeeding year.

    SS is not a retirement plan, it is an entitlement insurance plan that has been politically manipulated to buy votes from those that want as much as or more than what they put in.

    Yes, most of us will receive less than we contributed. When one considers the fact that the program is taking in much less than it is paying out, it is kind of silly to raise the payout amount at all.


    That seems correct for one of the parties.
    Payer: smiley_sun5.jpg


    Payee:screwed.gif
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,681 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Hunter Mag
    But Don the SS system would have plenty of $$$ if the government didn't spend it when the system was solvent.
    Did you know the $255 death benefit hasn't been increased since 1941.
    But the cronies, crooks and criminals I mean politicians don't have to worry about this because they're exempt from it.
    The SS system is just for us peasants.[B)]


    The SS 'Trust Fund' was invested in Government Bonds, and earned that interest upon maturity. It wasn't spent in the sense that it was tracked and internally got what has been historically the safest ROI of all instruments. Not the best ROI, mind you, but the safest.

    The link below gives a listing of currently held securities. If you go to 'Investments Held' at the top left of the page, you can look up securities purchased in any month back to 1990.

    https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/investheld.cgi

    The fund is running out of money now because it has paid out to people much more than they paid in plus the return paid out by the bonds.

    Both parties have used the system to buy peoples' votes for decades. This entitlement mentality has destroyed the system, as any politician that has vowed to bring payouts in line with income is never voted into office.

    There are any number of insurance companies that offer an inexpensive death benefit policy. Why would it be incumbent upon government to provide this at all?
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • mnrivrat48mnrivrat48 Member Posts: 1,707 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:The Social Security system is sometimes considered to be a social aid program and has some characteristics of such programs, but unlike these programs, social security was designed as a self-funded security blanket - so that as the payee pays in (during working years), they are pre-paying for the payments they'll receive back out of the system when they are no longer working.

    Some folks would argue that SS in not an entitlement program. The system is not a government handout. As stated above it was designed to be a forced savings held in a trust account by government. We do not have the same program that was inacted. It has been butchered like almost everything else by corrupt government.
  • cbxjeffcbxjeff Member Posts: 17,624 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    0.3% is probably less of a total payout than it cost to calculate and change the monthly payment by all the well paid government workers than it offers. That amount won't pay for one beer a month for me. Wait, what am I saying. I just ran the numbers and it would just pay for one beer at a Colts game per month.
    It's too late for me, save yourself.
  • o b juano b juan Member Posts: 1,941 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    last time they raised it they raised my Medicare deduct about the same amount[V]
  • eastbankeastbank Member Posts: 4,052 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    when i my large raise from SS, i,m going to a local bar and have a big glass of draft beer and walk over to the river bridge and piss it away. mr myopic.
  • Spider7115Spider7115 Member Posts: 29,704 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Wow, a whole $6 raise! I'm going to buy 3 rolls of nickels and roll around in them. [:(!]
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,681 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by mnrivrat48
    quote:The Social Security system is sometimes considered to be a social aid program and has some characteristics of such programs, but unlike these programs, social security was designed as a self-funded security blanket - so that as the payee pays in (during working years), they are pre-paying for the payments they'll receive back out of the system when they are no longer working.

    Some folks would argue that SS in not an entitlement program. The system is not a government handout. As stated above it was designed to be a forced savings held in a trust account by government. We do not have the same program that was inacted. It has been butchered like almost everything else by corrupt government.


    SS and Medicare are the very definition of an Entitlement Program. The term has been vilified by some to somehow separate the welfare programs that are not individually identified from the welfare programs that are individually identified. Any government program that guarantees a payment or benefit to any group of people is an Entitlement Program. It is not a negative term, IMO.

    It has not been butchered by government. It has been butchered by the voters who vote people into office (like Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump) who vow to not cut payouts and/or increase payouts without taking the politically risky step of proposing practicable ways of paying for it. If everyone received only what they paid in, the program would fail due to administrative expenses. All government programs need to take in more money than they pay out.

    Today SS takes in less than it pays out. It is unsustainable. Paul Ryan presented a plan some years ago that attempted to address this fatal flaw, but was roundly rebuffed by both the GOP and DEM members of the house. If the SS system is to remain a unique entity in the Federal Budget, steps will have to be taken to bring expenses in line with revenue. This will by necessity involve increasing revenue relative to expenses. One can do this by increasing revenue which only the Democrats want to do or decreasing expenses which no one wants to do, or both, which everyone should want to do.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Don, you have to admit, it has worked better and longer than most Ponzi schemes.

    I don't look a give horse in the mouth even if he is only .3 hands tall.

    I am taking my windfall to go next door and bid on a gun. Later.
  • Don McManusDon McManus Member Posts: 23,681 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by He Dog
    Don, you have to admit, it has worked better and longer than most Ponzi schemes.

    I don't look a give horse in the mouth even if he is only .3 hands tall.

    I am taking my windfall to go next door and bid on a gun. Later.


    People are just living too damn long now, He Dog.

    When this was set up, few lived long enough to collect much at all.

    I begrudge no-one their windfall, either. Particularly so fine a gentleman as yourself and one who puts it to such noble use.
    Freedom and a submissive populace cannot co-exist.

    Brad Steele
  • eastbankeastbank Member Posts: 4,052 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    FDR put in to make a feeding trough for the government, as he-they didn,t think many would live long enough to collect. even to day if you die on the day you retire you wife will only get a 255.00 death benifit. mr myopic.
  • He DogHe Dog Member Posts: 51,593 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    She will also get 50% you your benefit.
  • roswellnativeroswellnative Member Posts: 10,188 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I know three people under age 40 that are rec SSI The racket is that the populus can get disability and then draw from a fund they put 0 ( or very little) into. Then the ppl that put in over their lifetime dont even get to keep up with inflation. makes me sick
    Ros
    Although always described as a cowboy, Roswellnative generally acts as a righter of wrongs or bodyguard of some sort, where he excels thanks to his resourcefulness and incredible gun prowesses.
  • JunkballerJunkballer Member Posts: 9,294 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    What % increase/raise did congress *really* give themselves....that should be the story here [:(!]

    "Never do wrong to make a friend----or to keep one".....Robert E. Lee

  • wundudneewundudnee Member Posts: 6,108 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Some people call it social security, HeDog and I figure it's called gun of the month plan.[:D]
    standard.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.