In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

CRAZY JURIES ! ! !

guardian505guardian505 Member Posts: 24 ✭✭
edited May 2002 in General Discussion
Read these and decide whether you want to place your life and liberty in the hands of our jury system.

Do you recognize a common theme here?


Now, we have the Stella Awards given to the individuals who win the most frivolous lawsuits ever. The Stella Awards are named in honor of 81 year-old Stella Liebeck, the woman who won $2.9 million for spilling a cup of McDonald's coffee on herself. The following are candidates for the Award:

January 2000: Kathleen Robertson of Austin, TX, was awarded $780,000 by a jury of her peers after breaking her ankle, tripping over a toddler who was running amuck inside a furniture store. The owners of the store were understandably surprised at the verdict, considering that the misbehaving little fellow was Ms. Robertson's son.

June 1998: 19 year-old Carl Truman of Los Angeles won $74,000 and medical expenses when his neighbor ran over his hand with a Honda Accord. Mr. Truman apparently didn't notice there was someone at the wheel of the car when he was trying to steal his neighbor's hubcaps.

October, 1998: Terrence Dickson of Bristol, PA, was leaving a house he had just finished robbing by way of the garage. He was not able to get the garage door to go up, because the automatic door opener was malfunctioning. He couldn't reenter the house because the door connecting the house and garage locked when he pulled it shut. The family was on vacation. Mr. Dickson found himself locked in the garage for eight days. He subsisted on a case of Pepsi he found in the garage and a large bag of dry dog food. Mr. Dickson sued the homeowner's insurance claiming the situation caused him undue mental anguish. The jury agreed to the tune of a half million dollars.

October 1999: Jerry Williams of Little Rock, Arkansas, was awarded $14,500 and medical expenses after being bitten on the buttocks by his next door neighbor's beagle. The dog was on a chain in its owner's fenced-in yard at the time. Mr. Williams was also in the fenced-in yard. The award was less than sought because the jury felt the dog may have been provoked by Mr. Williams who, at the time, was repeatedly shooting it with a pellet gun.

December 1997: A Philadelphia restaurant was ordered to pay Amber Carson of Lancaster, PA, $113,500 after she slipped on a soft drink and broke her coccyx. The beverage was on the floor because Ms. Carson threw it at her boyfriend 30 seconds earlier during an argument.

December 1997: Kara Walton of Clamont, DE, successfully sued the owner of a night club when she fell from the bathroom window to the floor and knocked out her two front teeth. This occurred while Ms. Walton was trying to sneak through the window in the ladies room to avoid paying the $3.50 cover charge. She was awarded $12,000 and dental expenses.

Comments

  • YankeeClipperYankeeClipper Member Posts: 669 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Closer to home with less attention. The BLM instructed a rancher to fence back 4 miles from the road so people couldn't see his cows. 4 times he has won in court and still the BLM officer is demanding that he put up the fence.

    Helping keep America free: One gun at a time.
  • mickthenailermickthenailer Member Posts: 37 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    This topic has been around for a while and what they never
    mention is what happened after the appeals process. I don't know
    about the others. but the lady these awards are named after
    eventually settled for the cost of her medical bills. I believe it was
    around $60.000.
  • daddodaddo Member Posts: 3,408
    edited November -1
    Thats real "fuzzy justice."
    What are people thinking?
  • dobieman0690dobieman0690 Member Posts: 148 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    what kind of drugs where these juries on these are all insane were there any judges paying attention to these cases
  • thesupermonkeythesupermonkey Member Posts: 3,905 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    These have to be a hoax, I can't believe any jury would agree to that.

    Don't worry about the bullet with your name on it, worry about the fragmentation grenade addressed 'To Occupant'.
  • guardian505guardian505 Member Posts: 24 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    those examples came from an attorney friend of mine. I assume they are true.

    It is difficult to believe the verdict in the "Rodney King" case tried in Simi Valley as well as the "O J Simpson" verdict but there they are. Kind of makes you wonder if the D.A. ever gets a conviction but our prisons are full to overflowing.

    "Better to be thought the fool, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt"
  • simonbssimonbs Member Posts: 994
    edited November -1
    Munkey, these are no hoax. Actual, recorded judgments. However, as someone earlier pointed out, no mention of the outcome of the appeals. It is amazing though, that there is even a need for an appeal in cases like those.

    I'm not afraid of the dark...the dark is afraid of me!
Sign In or Register to comment.