In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Yet MORE on the "ineffective" .22 caliber rounds

Matt45Matt45 Member Posts: 3,185
edited April 2002 in General Discussion
Found this in my archives, I believe this is a compilation study done by JANE's. Is that good enough for the nay-sayers???? Y'know who you are, always on target, scoring Bullseyes!Wounding Effects of the U.S. Military M193 (M16A1) and M855 (M16A2) Bullet CartridgesExaggerated descriptions of the wounding effects of the M16 rifle bullet flourish as great works of urban lore. One fable describes a bullet that tumbles end-over-end in flight as soon as it exits the muzzle of the rifle. Another legend provides a dramatic account of an unstable, super-high velocity bullet that tumbles and chews its way through flesh like a buzz saw. Although there appears to be a tinge of half-truth behind these entertaining and awe-inspiring mythical tales, these stories do not represent an accurate description of the wounding characteristics of the M16 bullet.When the M16 cartridge is fired and the bullet is propelled down the bore, the bore's rifling imparts a gyroscopic spin to the bullet. This gyroscopic rotation is needed to maintain point forward stabilization of the bullet as it flies through the air. This method of bullet stabilization is identical to the rotational spin applied to a football when thrown by a quarterback (American football).The Earth's gaseous atmosphere is approximately 400 times less dense than the body's soft tissues. When the M16 bullet strikes and plows into the body, the rotational spin that stabilized its flight through the air is insufficient to maintain its stability as it flies through dense tissue. The bullet typically penetrates point forward for approximately 4-5 inches before it begins to seek a state of stability in the body.The bullet's pointed shape makes it heavier at its base than its nose, producing a center of gravity that is located aft of its longitudinal centerline. When the bullet hits the body and penetrates, the bullet attempts to rotate 180 degrees around its center of gravity to achieve a base forward orientation. This backwards orientation is the bullet's stable position in tissue because it places the center of gravity forward.As the bullet yaws through 90 degrees and is traveling sideways through flesh, the stress of tissue resistance to bullet passage can overpower the physical integrity of the bullet. The bullet has a groove around its midsection called a cannelure. The purpose of the cannelure is to permit the mouth of the cartridge case to be crimped tightly against the bullet shank to hold it firmly to the case. The cannelure weakens the structural integrity of the bullet's copper jacket.At distances of 100 yards and under, when the bullet hits the body and yaws through 90 degrees, the stresses on the bullet cause the leading edge to flatten, extruding lead core out the open base, just before it breaks apart at the cannelure. The portion of the bullet forward of the cannelure, the nose, usually remains in one piece and retains about 60 percent of the bullet's original weight. The portion of the bullet aft of the cannelure, the base, violently disintegrates into multiple lead core and copper jacket fragments, which penetrate up to 3-inches radially outward from the wound track. The fragments perforate and weaken the surrounding tissues allowing the subsequent temporary cavity to forcibly stretch and rip open the multiple small wound tracks produced by the fragments. The resulting wound is similar to one produced by a commercial expanding bullet used for varmint hunting, however the maximum tissue damage produced by the military bullet is located at a greater penetration depth.(The increased wounding effects produced by bullet fragmentation were not well understood until the mid-1980's. Therefore the wounding effects of the original M16 rifle bullet were not an intentional U.S. military design characteristic.)At distances between 100-200 yards the bullet commonly breaks in half at the cannelure forming two large penetrating fragments, the nose and base.At distances beyond 200 yards the bullet usually remains intact due to velocity decay. It simply yaws 180 degrees to penetrate backwards through the body.Both the M193 and M855 bullets demonstrate similar terminal performance as described above, when fired from rifles fitted with a 20-inch or longer barrel.Shooting the M193 or M855 from a rifle with a barrel length less than 14.5-inches produces insufficient muzzle velocity to achieve the terminal performance described above. A rifle fitted with a 14.5-inch barrel is adequate for close-quarters battle. For engagements anticipated at greater than room distance but less than 100 yards, a rifle fitted with a 16.5-inch barrel should be employed to ensure sufficient velocity.The older 55-grain M193 (M16A1) cartridge is not sensitive to rifling twist rate and can be fired in rifles with 1:12, 1:9 and 1:7 rates of twist. However, the newer M855 (M16A2) cartridge is best used with a rifling twist rate of 1:7 or 1:9. When the M855 is fired in a rifle with a slower rate of twist the longer 62-grain bullet can yaw up to 70 degrees in free trajectory through the air, substantially degrading accuracy.The wound ballistics of the U.S. military Olin M193/Winchester 55 grain FMJ (X223R1 or Q3131) and green tip U.S. military Olin M855/Winchester 62 grain FMJ (RA556M855) cartridges makes them an adequate choice for use against violent criminal offenders.Additional testing has indicated that errant bullets (military FMJ and commercial .223 Remington JSP/JHP) which do not hit an attacker appear to penetrate fewer walls and other common building materials than stray handgun bullets.References:Fackler, Martin L.: "Wounding Patterns of Military Rifle Bullets." International Defense Review 1/1989, 59-64.Fackler, Martin L. : "Physics of Missile Injuries," Evaluation and Management of Trauma, Chapter 2. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, CT; 1987, p. 35.Roberts, Gary K, D.D.S.: "The Wounding Effects of 5.56MM/.223 Law Enforcement General Purpose Shoulder Fired Carbines Compared with 12 GA. Shotguns and Pistol Caliber Weapons Using 10% Ordnance Gelatin as a Tissue Simulant." Wound Ballistics Review 3(4), 16-28; 1998.
Reserving my Right to Arm Bears!!!![This message has been edited by Matt45 (edited 04-03-2002).]

Comments

  • BullzeyeBullzeye Member Posts: 3,560
    edited November -1
    quote:"...we are still stuck with a rifle that doesn't qualify as a deer sized hunting rifle in but one or two uninformed states.That's PA in a nutshell... quote:"tell me where it says that we can't use a .223 in PA"Unless you've got a bolter chambered for .223, look below: quote:Unlawful Sporting Arms:Automatic and semi-automatic rifles and handguns; air or gas-operated rifles and handgunsHmmm....they're still ignorant to allow the .223 at all, but at least they're not so idiotic as to allow deer hunting with an AR-15.You shoot a deer with a .223 and you're cruel. I dont care what the hell your excuse is.If I have a nail I need to drive into a board, I dont hit it with my damn shoe and end up putting it halfway in and then bending it all over.We should encourage people to hunt bear with .223. It would weed out a lot of really dumb people from the gene pool.
  • Big Sky RedneckBig Sky Redneck Member Posts: 19,752 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Well Buzzeye, single shots are legal for regular season and thats what I use. As far as the other, there are no rules as to what we use because that is not hunting in their book. You say it is cruel to shoot a deer with that, I can't believe your arrogance, can't wait to hear what you say about bow hunting. You think you are so freaking smart huh? Well ok then, have it your way. You win, I give up. You are a snobby spoiled little brat who thinks he knows everything, you are a perfect example as to why the youger generations have problems, you kids think you know everything and you believe those dang glory books. Hell I need to break out some of my Elmer Keith articles and read those to you, hey he wrote them it must be true. Bullzeye, just think, I defended you when clouder jumped all over you, I regret it now, I truly see that what he says about you is dead on.
  • Matt45Matt45 Member Posts: 3,185
    edited November -1
    Bullz-Perhaps if you toned down that *-ocular view on certian issues, folks wouldn't wanna squash ya like a little bug. Now exactly what was your response in regards to my post?-MattLIKTOSHOOT-Here's irony for ya, to think YOU sold me my first XM-15E2S that I have ever personally owned. (Hey, it's ALL about the Ben-ja-mins! Right?)I'll be the first to admit, the '16 was fielded too soon, with woefully inadequate research and development. It would never be my intention to cheapen the loss of life by any service member who served before me, especially due to that rifle thrust upon them by political agenda, motivated by greed. I do think, however, you are drawing away from the issue I'm trying to focus on, the round itself, and it's accuracy and effectivness when used in current, well-developed firearms. There is a lot of argument on this board in regards to current firearms training in the military with many feeling that, because we carry larger amounts of ammo and have higher capacity mags, that "spray and pray" is the rule of thumb. Then why is the minimum score for "Expert" still 38 out of 40. Why is rifle qual. is still a one shot, one kill scenario? Why is it that basic rifle marksmanship training takes up the largest portion of Basic Recruit Training? With the focus on the above stated parameters??If the .223 is such an ineffective round, why are we still using it? Surely after 35 years or so we would have fielded something "better" chambered for a "better" round. Sure the "rest" of the "free" world uses it because they get them free from Uncle Sugar (US), but would you continue to use something, even if it's free, clone it a dozen times over, develop new assesories and modifications, establish local ammunition manufacturing facilities, and keep it as your primary weapons system if it was completely ineffective? Look at the Isrealis, those guys really don't play and from what I have seen, the M-16 outnumbers the UZI, Galil or AK 10 to 1.The bottom line is not every grunt on the battlefield needs to have a .308. Would I prefer to utilize a weapons platform based upon the .308, maybe, but that's a situational dependant question, all things considered, I'm confident with my M-16A2, based upon my training and previous experiance. Now on the other hand-and this is kinda perverse in itself, I really don't understand swapping 8 rounds of .45ACP for 16 rounds of 9mm. It's a very simular and almost parallel trend, but I really don't get it! Where is the wisdom in that?
    Reserving my Right to Arm Bears!!!![This message has been edited by Matt45 (edited 04-04-2002).]
  • v35v35 Member Posts: 12,710 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm looking foward to Part II.Interestingly, There was an Irv Culver who did an early expose on the dangerous weaknesses of the Beech Bonanza airplane.
Sign In or Register to comment.