In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Portland police refuse to cooperate with DOJ

alledanalledan Member Posts: 19,541
edited November 2001 in General Discussion
-- Portland police have refused a U.S. Justice Department request for help in interviewing Middle Eastern immigrants as part of its sweeping terrorism investigation, saying it would violate state law. Attorney General John Ashcroft announced earlier this month that the Justice Department had distributed a list of 5,000 men it wanted to interview about the September 11 terrorist attacks, an effort that has been widely criticized by civil rights groups. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Portland asked city police for cooperation last week, acting police chief Andrew Kirkland said Tuesday. The request was denied because Oregon law says no one can be questioned by police unless they are suspected of being involved in a crime, he said. "The law says, generally, we can interview people that we may suspect have committed a crime," Kirkland said. "But the law does not allow us to go out and arbitrarily interview people whose only offense is immigration or citizenship, and it doesn't give them authority to arbitrarily gather information on them." Portland is believed to be the first city to refuse to cooperate with the Justice Department in its anti-terrorism effort. Portland FBI spokeswoman Beth Anne Steele said Tuesday she couldn't comment on the investigation. Justice Department officials were unavailable for comment Tuesday night. Charles Gorder, an assistant United States attorney in Portland, told The New York Times that the interviews would be completed, with or without help from local police. Arabs and Muslims have expressed outrage at the U.S. Justice Department's plan to interview the 5,000 men, who are not suspected of any crimes. The list is comprised of men ages 18 to 33 who entered the United States since January 1, 2000, from countries that have been linked to the hijackers in the September 11 attacks or were waystations for the terrorist organization, al Qaeda. Civil rights activists say the action constitutes racial profiling. The Justice Department acknowledges the men are likely to be Arab and Muslim, but says the list wasn't based on ethnic origin. Racial profiling is also against state law, Kirkland said. Kirkland, who is black, said profiling is an issue that hits home for him, but that's not why the Justice Department's request was rejected. "I am sympathetic to that issue from a perspective of growing up African American. That doesn't factor into any decision to do this or not. We made that decision regarding racial profiling long before September 11. That decision was made for us when the Legislature wrote the law."

Comments

  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It appears Northwest is being over run w/ the thought police from Kalifornica.
  • mudgemudge Member Posts: 4,225 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Although I agree with the purpose of the Justice Dept. request, Chief Kirkland is right. Just as the Arizona Sheriff was right in refusing to do background checks. Mudge
    I can't come to work today. The voices said, STAY HOME AND CLEAN THE GUNS!
  • Smoky14Smoky14 Member Posts: 531 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Mudge..I was acquainted with Sheriff Mack. His stand was an act of courage which cost him very much in his personal life. Few of us have the BRASS to do what he did.I salute Sheriff Mack.
    Respect for self Respect for others Responsible for all actions
  • TeamblueTeamblue Member Posts: 782 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    So does this law prohibit the Oregon officers from interviewing possible witnesses or acquaintances of these people? Must we supect everyone of a crime before we ask them questions or for their help??? Come on Chief Kirkland that argument is weak. I am all for protecting everyones rights, civil and otherwise but these are extraordinary times and we are at War. Supporting the efforts of the DOJ in this important matter is not an all or nothing issue. Will it take a terrorist act that directly affects the city of Portland to make you see this requires a national effort? I am confident that the fine citizens of Portland will know when and even if any investigation undertaken in the effort to combat terrorism within our borders has gone too far and encroached on civil liberties. They will not stand for it, but they deserve better than for their public safety officials to stand by and do nothing. IMHO
Sign In or Register to comment.