Anti-Gun Logic

cpileri

It was an attack on the United States. An Act of War. It started with boxcutters and ended with thousands of dead countrymen. It was the Pearl Harbor of the 21st Century. Therefore... we need to keep guns away from lawful Amercian citizens!Make sense? (not)

---

luger01

cpileri,I think your topic name is a misnomer. There is no such thing as anti-gun logic - logic is totally missing from all the anti-gun arguments!The anti-gun wackos have only misinformation, lies, and emotional arguments to use. A logical evaluation of the issues can only result in one conclusion - that honest, sane citizens MUST own and be able to competantly use guns (and other weapons) to protect themselves and society from those who are evil and seek to deprive others by forcible and violent means.It is our RESPONSIBILITY to defend the good and decent by all means available. Even most religons teach this. Ghandi himself condemned the British for disarming its subjects (in India). Yes, the man of peace knew that when a government disarms its populace, only evil can result.

badboybob

Right on luger01

ref44

Three good points to remember when talking with anti-gun people:Some will say that the the government gave you the right to own guns, so the government can rescind that right. Not so..."We are endowed BY OUR CREATOR with certain inalienaable rights......" It is the government's duty to protect the rights given to us by our Creator.Why dosn't M.A.D.D. try to eliminate cars? Because they have sense enough to know that it is the driver, not the car, that is irresponsible. But they WOULD have some argument for doing so, since the right to drive a car is not protected by the Constitution.Don't let anyone get you sidetracked talking about "need"...like "Why do you need an assault rifle?" or "Why do you need a 15-rd magazine?" The Bill of Rights has NOTHING to do with need or with hunting, regardless of what Bill Clinton thinks or says. The issue is FREEDOM, not NEED.