In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
one for the armchair lawyer/constitutionalists
rambo rebel
Member Posts: 4,028
since there are those that believe that it's constitutionally sound for health care to be a "right" and that planned parenthood should be allowed to receive taxpayer money against the will of most religious minded people just because the poor can't afford it then why can't we apply the same logic to the 2nd amendment which IS a right, plainly written?
I say we pass a law that would allow for the poor who can own a gun legally be given first choice on all police turn ins and confiscations rather than having the weapons destroyed.
think the left would like their logic (I know) used against them?
I say we pass a law that would allow for the poor who can own a gun legally be given first choice on all police turn ins and confiscations rather than having the weapons destroyed.
think the left would like their logic (I know) used against them?
Comments
and they look at gun owners are trying to go the wrong way on there street
I f I remember was ( Switzerland [:D]) the country that issue a rifle to the people when they turned 18 , maybe that was some time ago ?
could you image the libs and dems just passing out in the street if we adopted such a law [:D]
...but their logic skips a step.
they have the right to all the health care they can afford. who has the right to stop them?
they don't have the right to make you, or me, or the government, pay for it.
they also have the right to eat cheeseburgers. and...?
like other topics its a one way street for the libs its only makes sense when its in there favor
and they look at gun owners are trying to go the wrong way on there street
I f I remember was Sweden the country that issue a rifle to the people when they turned 18 , maybe that was some time ago ?
could you image the libs and dems just passing out in the street if we adopted such a law [:D]
I believe you are referring to the Swiss.
I remembered after I posted [:I][:I][:I]
Thanks
quote:Originally posted by skicat
quote:Originally posted by Ditch-Runner
like other topics its a one way street for the libs its only makes sense when its in there favor
and they look at gun owners are trying to go the wrong way on there street
I f I remember was Sweden the country that issue a rifle to the people when they turned 18 , maybe that was some time ago ?
could you image the libs and dems just passing out in the street if we adopted such a law [:D]
I believe you are referring to the Swiss.
Yes
I remembered after I posted [:I][:I][:I]
Thanks
quote:Originally posted by skicat
quote:Originally posted by Ditch-Runner
like other topics its a one way street for the libs its only makes sense when its in there favor
and they look at gun owners are trying to go the wrong way on there street
I f I remember was Sweden the country that issue a rifle to the people when they turned 18 , maybe that was some time ago ?
could you image the libs and dems just passing out in the street if we adopted such a law [:D]
I believe you are referring to the Swiss.
they get to keep the one they are issued while in the military I think
quote:Originally posted by Ditch-Runner
Yes
I remembered after I posted [:I][:I][:I]
Thanks
quote:Originally posted by skicat
quote:Originally posted by Ditch-Runner
like other topics its a one way street for the libs its only makes sense when its in there favor
and they look at gun owners are trying to go the wrong way on there street
I f I remember was Sweden the country that issue a rifle to the people when they turned 18 , maybe that was some time ago ?
could you image the libs and dems just passing out in the street if we adopted such a law [:D]
I believe you are referring to the Swiss.
they get to keep the one they are issued while in the military I think
They don't actually get to keep it. It's mandatory for all men at the age of 20 to join the Armed Forces unless incapable to join because of physical or mental disabilities, or can be deferred if attending school out of the country for up to four years (women can volunteer). If you are unable to join because of disabilities you have to pay an extra 2% in taxes until you are the age of 30. Upon joining they spend between 16 to 20 weeks in basic training being taught what is necessary to learn what they need to for their respective jobs in the military. Upon completion of basic training 95% of them are put on ready reserve status, which lasts until they're 30 years old for the Grunts, 38 years old for the NCOs and from 58 to 65 for officers. While they are on ready reserve status, it is mandatory that they keep and maintain their government issued personal equipment until retirement age which includes their firearm(s). Upon retirement they are obligated to turn in their equipment including their firearm(s). I hope this clears it up for you guys. But wouldn't it be nice if every man between the 20 to 30 and beyond in the United States would be on ready reserve status?
Agree a better and slightly lightly to be passed. Adapt to a plan with a similar end result requiring all citizens to serve for 2 years for our country.
Laws do not apply to these elitists, they apply to everyone else. The Clintons are exempt from all laws. Leftists like Zuckerberg surround themselves with a dozen or more armed guards but will take away your Second Amendment right in a heartbeat if they had the power.