In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Doc
Big Sky Redneck
Member Posts: 19,752 ✭✭✭
Just wanted to keep you up with the .22lr market. Picked up 700 rounds of CCI standard velocity for just under $4/100 at the Tulsa show.[8D]
Comments
Thanks for the gift.
Hairy has my dealers FFL so that will be next.
Thanks guys.
John
Doc
Advanced Member
12816 Posts
Posted - 04/10/2010 : 4:21:42 PM
Well, since everyone is so anxious to participate in a drawing held by a generally unpopular member I'll up the ante just a bit (if HAIRY doesn't mind) and offer to ship 20 rounds of appropriate 8x57 ammo to the winner so he/she can try out the new rifle.
OK with you HAIRY?
"like the rest of us"
and lashed out at someone
does not mean you have to boot yourself from the forum
if that was the case
I would have been booting myself many times over
Come on back and post some more pics of some of the finest collection of rifles I have ever seen
Come on back and share your vast weapons knowledge
Come on back
I will even say please and say I am sorry for judging you
for something I have been guilty of too
Only one man walked the earth without fault[:)]
either that
or I will send Don to kick your *
and while he keeps you busy.....
I will steal your Knucklehead Harley
and replace it with a minibike [}:)] [:p] [:o)]
Could you repost?
Thanks.
Just looking for good surplus other than CMP
Dav1965@aol.com or my cell phone number 1-252-343-9471
Thanks David
If you send an e-mail let me know to look im over 48,000 e-mails behind.
http://youtu.be/aBf2mXY5xmE
I also want a python and will need help picking that out also.
My (initial) critical post yesterday on the USS Little Rock thread had little to do with the ship itself and everything to do with the military posture driving its very existence. From there things quickly degenerated into an unnecessary pissing match over the ship itself which I allowed myself to be drawn into. For that I apologize.
My initial argument, I believe, is still valid. For clarity, this position is simply; we (our government leadership) are allowing ourselves (i.e. forcing our military) to stoop to the lowest common denominator when developing systems to combat threats which shouldn't even be threats in the first place. We are addressing a symptom and completely ignoring the disease itself. And, as a result, we are allowing history to repeat itself over and over again.
Case in point (and this is just one example of many), the PBR (patrol boat river) was developed to combat a threat in the Mekong Delta of Viet Nam. Okay, fine, but why? If our leadership had taken the position of actually "winning" the conflict in Viet Nam at a strategic level, then there would have been a significantly reduced need to combat pockets of resistance in the deltas of the Mekong River. Now just so we don't get Mr. Navybat all spun up again, let me be clear; I am not taking the PBR to task here, only the strategy which lead to its need. We were fighting the war on their terms, not ours. If we'd have gone in there like we meant it, isolated the country, crushed the leadership and cut the head off the snake...and then stood our ground to keep it that way, things would have been different. Instead, we sacrificed the lives of upwards of 60,000 U.S. Service personnel for effectively nothing in the end.
The Freedom Class littoral combat ship is just a reincarnation of this same mindset. And thus, history is seemingly repeating itself all over again, just on a different continent.
This is all I was trying to say initially. I have no issue with the USS Little Rock itself, and certainly no issue with the Navy personnel who serve aboard her. I do, however, take issue with the policy which drives her implementation, and the risks associated with the potential loss of U.S. lives as a result.
That is all.
edit...To be clear, I have no issue with the Viet Nam conflict, but take strong issue with the fact we engaged without the intent of actually winning it.
(Of course there's a story that goes with the book as well as the stories in the book!)
The top of the gun from the rear sights to the front sight looked case hardened or like it was replaced. The sight part of the gun was not chromed like the rest of the gun.
If i get the gun it should be for around 200. So either way its not a bad deal. Sometimes the district manager gets first dibs. We will see.
Thanks again.
http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=104165488
Too old to live...too young to die...