In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Firearms Are Prohibited

ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
edited July 2015 in General Discussion
FirearmsAreProhibited_03_zpsc2kxixsx.jpg

FirearmsAreProhibited_01_zps0me9mvcw.jpg

FirearmsAreProhibited_04_zps1eenngnl.jpg

FirearmsAreProhibited_02_zps1xiviu2r.jpg



Thought I should save some of these for emailing to politicians.

Comments

  • 1911a1-fan1911a1-fan Member Posts: 51,193 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Thought I should save some of these for emailing to politicians.


    their reply:

    he did honor the sign, all the shooting was don't from a non gun free zone, if guns where banned everywhere this could not have happened
  • crisisbillcrisisbill Member Posts: 487 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Another example of the uselessness of Gun Free Zone signs, clearly this was a soft target manufactured by Liberals.
    How sad that the armed police had to rescue the unarmed Marines.
  • ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by crisisbill
    Another example of the uselessness of Gun Free Zone signs, clearly this was a soft target manufactured by Liberals.
    How sad that the armed police had to rescue the unarmed Marines.


    I agree on the uselessness of gun free zones and moronic signs. But this started long, long ago. It has lasted thru both parties holding power at the top over and over again. The problem is as much military leadership as it is civilian.

    This should have changed instantly after 9/11. That it did not has always amazed me. Right alongside of not seeing armed National Guard patrols at international airports.

    Military facilities, be it a base or an office building or a hospital, should always have armed military personnel. Doesn't have to be everyone, but right now all too often it is no one. Maybe start with senior NCO's and officers when on duty. Or come up with some other plan but do make some kind of a plan.

    At the very least some non-police who carry a loaded sidearm and two spare magazines. Just as a minimum, as a place to start.

    I figure our military forces can come up with adequate training to use those sidearms.
  • pwilliepwillie Member Posts: 20,253 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    The gun free zone was instituted when Bill Clinton took office in 1992... Need another Clinton?
  • ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by pwillie
    The gun free zone was instituted when Bill Clinton took office in 1992... Need another Clinton?


    Not I nor anyone else needs another Clinton Error.


    The "Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990" was signed into law in November 1990 by President George H. W. Bush.

    The "Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994" was signed into law March 1994 by President Bill Clinton.

    The two laws take different angles of attack on Gun Rights and on lessening the safety of schools. Proving once again that both big political parties are perfectly capable of Stupid.

    So, is there another law that says military facilities must be disarmed save for guards and police? Or is it long standing military policy?
  • DirtyDawgDirtyDawg Member Posts: 1,075 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    quote:Originally posted by pwillie
    The gun free zone was instituted when Bill Clinton took office in 1992... Need another Clinton?


    Not I nor anyone else needs another Clinton Error.


    The "Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990" was signed into law in November 1990 by President George H. W. Bush.

    The "Gun-Free Schools Act of 1994" was signed into law March 1994 by President Bill Clinton.

    The two laws take different angles of attack on Gun Rights and on lessening the safety of schools. Proving once again that both big political parties are perfectly capable of Stupid.

    So, is there another law that says military facilities must be disarmed save for guards and police? Or is it long standing military policy?



    As Chris Stated, Jr. & Sr. have been equally responsible for destruction of this country, including our sovereignty and gun laws, as gun running, cocaine importing, intern screwing, "I did not have sex with that woman"....well...you know who I'm talking about...
  • Ray BRay B Member Posts: 11,822
    edited November -1
    the poor disillusioned fellow DID follow the rules- The sign should had said "No bullets allowed on the premises" THAT would have prevented this situation.
  • serfserf Member Posts: 9,217 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    What they need is ballistic glass installed in recruiting stations. But with the nation changing into a secular melting pot and radical visions of religious racism it's only going to get worst! Next will be Donald Trump being shot at by illegal Hispanics and you can thank out glorious leaders in Washington for That!

    The NWO/Police state is coming all for your safety and protection! [:o)]

    serf

    http://humanevents.com/2006/04/07/emexclusive-emthe-truth-about-la-raza/

    But the National Council of La Raza succeeded in raking in over $15.2 million in federal grants last year alone, of which $7.9 million was in U.S. Department of Education grants for Charter Schools, and undisclosed amounts were for get-out-the-vote efforts supporting La Raza political positions.
  • topdadtopdad Member Posts: 3,408 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The sign worked quite well, but to assist the bad guy in achieving
    his goals. It obviously did nothing to protect the victims.[:(!]
  • USN_AirdaleUSN_Airdale Member Posts: 2,987
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    FirearmsAreProhibited_03_zpsc2kxixsx.jpg

    FirearmsAreProhibited_01_zps0me9mvcw.jpg

    FirearmsAreProhibited_04_zps1eenngnl.jpg

    FirearmsAreProhibited_02_zps1xiviu2r.jpg



    Thought I should save some of these for emailing to politicians.




    just asking for an opinion.., do those bullet holes appear to be from semi-auto or full-auto ? also was it an AK47 or something else.

    just very curious. OK ?
  • LesWVaLesWVa Member Posts: 10,490 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Best statement yet....

    Dodge says the personnel in the office put their "active shooter drill" into effect, and "waited until everything seemed to be clear."


    So the policy is.. Do nothing but wait until the shooter is either out of ammo, gets tired and goes home or put his/her own lights out before we do anything... And HOPE LIKE HELL that he/she does not take you out before then??

    OK, I now understand gun control done the Democrat way..
  • wpagewpage Member Posts: 10,201 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Why have unarmed marines?
  • ChrisInTempeChrisInTempe Member Posts: 15,562
    edited November -1
    Saw a comment that a Navy Commander returned fire with a personal weapon. But it was police who stopped the killer.
  • pwilliepwillie Member Posts: 20,253 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ChrisInTempe
    Saw a comment that a Navy Commander returned fire with a personal weapon. But it was police who stopped the killer.


    ....as they should have....but,gun free zones do nothing to protect citizens...I think if a military person is on duty he should be able to carry just like any other citizen...look at the IDF!
  • Ray BRay B Member Posts: 11,822
    edited November -1
    This is my rifle
    This is my life
    Except when in gun-free zones
    I don't have my rifle
    I don't have my life.

    Get a clue Mr Commandant!!
  • dcon12dcon12 Member Posts: 32,038 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by wpage
    Why have unarmed marines?


    I heard it is to even the field! Don
  • spasmcreekspasmcreek Member Posts: 37,717 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    guess we can stop wasting money training soldiers in firearms use ...if we don't TRUST them on home soil with a weapon...unarmed soldiers = STUPID S--T
Sign In or Register to comment.