In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
The Agenda of Gun Control
Josey1
Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
The Agenda of Gun Control By: Ted Langc All rights reserved Published 03. 11. 2002 at 20:27 PST Gun control is an outrageous convolution of totally unconstitutional and illegal "legislation." The purpose of the Second Amendment is to permit arms availability to the citizens of the United States should they desire to alter or abolish their existent government. Societal entities within our Nation, namely the media, physical and emotionalized victims of gun violence and their support groups, socialists and the Democrat Party, have advocated the progressive, unlawful recision of the Second Amendment. It is a legitimate part of the United States Constitution and can only be revoked by action of all the states of the Union. Gun control is a collection of "infringements" specifically forbidden by the Second Amendment.Politicians originally viewed gun control as a harmless way to prove to their respective constituencies that they actively support the reduction of crime in our communities. Since most of these "harmless" laws were targeting only criminals, of what threat could this wrong-headed legislation be to law-abiding citizens? It's equivalent to chowder-headed citizens thinking it okay for various government elements to spy on the citizenry without just cause. The misguided would offer to protesters: If you don't have anything to hide, why would you care about your government spying on you?But not minding the government's spying on you is tantamount to providing evidence against yourself without invoking your right against self-incrimination as provided by the Fifth Amendment. If government decides to gain entry to your private residence looking for any reason to prosecute you in retaliation for challenging them, and that practice wasn't likewise banned by our Constitution, then government could harass its citizenry unchecked and use "national security" or anything else as an excuse. What if you kept a legal firearm in your house made illegal by our government's illegal and unconstitutional gun laws? The Founders didn't trust our government and its standing army which they wouldn't allow, so why should we?We are advancing to left-liberal progressive socialism and communism rather rapidly at this juncture of our Republic's short and soon-to-be-ended life. The very term "liberal" is a lie! "Liberal" used to define the philosophy of individual liberty and freedom, but it now represents unlimited authority of the state for the "greater good."Government and individual freedom have always been incompatible, and individuality is via rights bestowed by God. That is why liberalism is now dedicated to a "separation of church and state," a phrase contained nowhere in any of our founding documents. The liberal intent is separation of God and individual in order to reinstate the divine right of government abolished by the Declaration of Independence.As for government manufacturing a false reason for searching, seizing and destroying individual life and property, one need look no further than the corruption and despotism of our government falsely asserting that the Branch Davidians were abusing their children, so our compassionate government went in and gassed and burned the children alive. The corpses of the murdered babies and toddlers were reduced to burnt marshmallow residue! Whatever happened to Clinton and Reno's claims of Davidian child abuse and drug manufacturing? It was all a lie, developed in order for Clinton to initiate and justify a government terrorist campaign against law-abiding citizens at Waco to teach them a lesson about not loving their government and its gun control.Those who say it can't happen here and that we no longer need the Second Amendment are fooling themselves. Waco has happened, and so has TWA 800, 9-11, the Oklahoma City Bombing, the assassination of the Kennedys, and in the interest of "national security," our government is telling us nothing. In other words, they are more concerned about alarming us than telling us the truth. If that's the case, then we can safely assume they are chiefly responsible for not alerting us in a more timely manner so that a lot more lives could have been saved on September 11th.Continuing their stupid, bumbling incompetence, we are now facing internal nuclear attack and the Beltway boobs haven't taken the slightest action towards revitalizing civil defense. Nor have they loosened up gun control legislation in spite of the huge demand by the citizenry to arm and protect themselves. A nuclear terrorist attack will do a lot more than knock out government communications and protection - it will wreak havoc on a population made soft and effeminate by Rosie O'Donnell, Sarah Brady and singing Stalin, Barbara Streisand.The only measure taken by our government is to protect itself while preventing its citizens from doing the same. http://www.sierratimes.com/02/03/12/tedlang.htm
Comments
PC=BS