In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Curious on your opinion?

mcneely77mcneely77 Member Posts: 411 ✭✭✭
edited September 2002 in General Discussion
I happen to be friends with both the arresting officer from Sodus, and the Blaine, the tow truck driver.
Just curious of how you feel about it.


Owners may not get guns back

By JIM DALGLEISH / H-P City Editor

SODUS -- None of the 36 guns seized in February at a Sodus Township home were illegal, federal authorities say, but the owners still may not get them back.

Because police found less than a half-ounce of marijuana, the U.S. Attorney's Office has launched civil forfeiture proceedings to keep the guns and 28,359 rounds of ammunition, Assistant U.S. Attorney Brian Delaney said from his Grand Rapids office. He said felony criminal charges could follow if prosecutors conclude the owners lied on gun registration forms when answering standard questions about possible drug use.

Tricia Carrie-LaVanway Bauer, who owns the guns with her father, David LaVanway, and her husband, Blaine, said the marijuana possession was a fluke, a one-time occurrence.

"Just one time, and they're going to take 36 guns away? C'mon ...," she said.

She said that the guns are worth between $25,000 and $30,000 and that authorities seized only 8,000 rounds with bullets. The rest were primers.

"Eight-thousand rounds isn't much when it's divided by (36) guns," she said.

All 36 guns were fully registered and were often used in gun safety training, LaVanway Bauer said. The Bauers say they are gun instructors, with certifications from the National Rifle Association and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.

LaVanway Bauer said the couple cannot teach gun safety without firearms.

Police found a small amount of marijuana in her purse when her car was stopped Feb. 26 at Hillandale and Watson roads in Sodus Township.

The then-Coloma schools substitute bus driver pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge of having carried the drugs in a school zone. Coloma's bus garage is next to the high school. The drug charge cost her the job.

She said she had never failed a state-mandated bus driver drug test.

During the home raid, authorities seized 0.42 ounces of marijuana from David LaVanway's bedroom. The amount would make no more than three joints, she said.

She said her father had not used marijuana for years and had been given the drugs by a friend who occasionally stops by the house.

She said her father was not a drug user when he registered six guns about seven years ago through the Berrien County Sheriff's Department.

The Bauers and LaVanway live in the house, which sits on 3.2 acres along Lett Road in a rural part of the township. LaVanway Bauer said her grandmother owns the house.

She said surrounding property owners for years have tried to buy the house so they could divide up the property, and her family's refusal to sell may have prompted neighbors to fabricate stories for police.

Neighbors first called the sheriff's department in March 2001 to report automatic gunfire, drug sales and militia activity, according to an affidavit by Special Agent James Walsh of the federal Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms.

Other people quoted in the report alleged they saw automatic weapons, a silencer -- an illegal gun accessory -- a large truck with marijuana and human-shaped targets.

But investigators found no evidence to support those claims, Delaney said.

LaVanway Bauer said there was no evidence because no such things were ever at the home.

Much of ATF agent Walsh's report is drawn from sheriff's Detective Lt. David Chandler's interviews with four people, identified in Walsh's report only as "concerned neighbor" or "confidential source."

LaVanway Bauer said the anonymity of the sources is irksome.

"I think they (the sources) should have to come out," she said. "They have destroyed our lives over a bunch of gossip."

She said county and federal authorities needed only to knock on their door to inspect their guns, house and land. Instead, they sought federal warrants and performed a full-fledged raid Feb. 26.

Blaine Bauer was arrested nearby as he was driving home in his tow truck. Police found a handgun behind his seat.

LaVanway Bauer said the gun was registered, legally carried and contained no rounds. Bauer used the gun for shooting behind the tow truck service's garage while waiting for calls.

Nonetheless, he pleaded no contest to a concealed weapons charge and was sentenced to one year's probation. The charge could be dismissed if he meets probation terms.

Assistant Berrien County Prosecutor Caryn Hebets said testimony showed the gun was accessible for Bauer from the driver's seat and that it was not properly cased. Hebets said Bauer told the court he had the gun in the truck for four or five days.

For trucks, state law says a gun must be in a locked case designed for guns, the ammunition must be kept separate, and the gun can only be carried directly to and from shooting ranges.

"You can't carry it around in your vehicle indefinitely," Hebets said.


Do not mistake my kindness for weakness.

IALEFI, ASLET, NRA, and proud owner of a pair of S&W revolvers.

Comments

  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    In the first place, a half ounce of pot will make a lot more than three joints. But that's not the point. How many people do you know who are telling the truth when they say it was "just this one time." It may be the one time they got caught, but .... we know the odds of this being the one and only time are slim, indeed. Which means the probability of them lying to authorities is high.

    This is the risk a gun owner runs for indulging in non-prescription illicit drug use, however harmless it may begin to seem over time. I think they got a jolt of reality. They'll be lucky to keep their guns.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Member Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    bet they think twice before they buy more pot. I have always thought that the "war" on drugs should come down hard on the user. No users = no traffic. "But its just pot!!! waaaaa" One of the idiots tosses a roach out of your car onto your property and it has a seed in it, you could lose your land, or at least a heck of a lot of money defending it. Want to smoke pot? move to Colombia.

    Those people who see nothing but grey areas, no black and white, are lost in the fog.
  • SUBMARINERSUBMARINER Member Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    will they confiscate your guns if you have beer in your fridge???or better yet if i have guns downstairs in my cabinet and im upstairs watchin the race and gettin drunker than 10 indians are my actions not worse than mere possesion of pot??i dont even smoke dope,but my view is this is ridiculous

    SUBMARINE SAILOR,TRUCK DRIVER,RUSTY WALLACE FAN AND AS EVERYONE SO OFTEN POINTS OUT PISS POOR TYPIST e-mail:WNUNLEY@USIT.NET
  • SUBMARINERSUBMARINER Member Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    oh and none of that crap about one is legal and the other one aint ok....the only rea pot isnt legal is cause the government hasnt found an angle to tax it yet

    SUBMARINE SAILOR,TRUCK DRIVER,RUSTY WALLACE FAN AND AS EVERYONE SO OFTEN POINTS OUT PISS POOR TYPIST e-mail:WNUNLEY@USIT.NET
  • Harleeman1030Harleeman1030 Member Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Do you not have to check that your not a heavy drinker on the yellow form..
    If i am not mistaken if you drink two (2) beers a day your a achaolic(sp) by medical terms..I too don't enjoy the smoke anymore never fought for the lets make it legal...

    offeror... i have friends that will make a joint out of that just to do it...Say your kid,girlfriend,a friend riding with you in a car or in your house and the cops found dope on one of them you think you don't have friends that do drugs..But if you think that you are in for a shock..
    ie: cops come into your house find dope in your kids room..BOOM your guns are fkn gone...

    Varmit... i might be wrong but i don't think a seed will be able to grow withhout the proper planting and fertilization..

    And i have never heard of someone on just pot going crazy and killing it makes you stupid and slow as hell.
    But i have heard of drunk driver's killing...Drunk people shooting grilfriends,friends,and just plain losing it..Drunks firing guns into the air.

    I drink but i refuse to drink and drive,,Drink and hunt, drink and shoot or clean a gun...

    I know this much people don't get mean on pot...If your going to judge one then judge another..I think it might be a little overboard

    If we lived in a perfect world you would not be here
    NRA MEMBER
  • leeblackmanleeblackman Member Posts: 5,303 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Maybe I just didn't catch it, but what were the officers probable cause for the original search? I can't believe they did a raid on a house with the only evidence being a complaint. That would justify a knock on the door, not a door knock down. Sounds to me like some really stupid judge or JP is going to get his/her hide tanned for signing that document.

    I mean come on, honestly, I don't see them as doing a single thing wrong. They're going to ruin these people's lives over some stupid technicality.

    Though they were ignorant, they should just be sentenced to drug counseling. And I will pray for them.

    If I'm wrong please correct me, I won't be offended.

    The sound of a 12 gauge pump clears a house fatser than Rosie O eats a Big Mac !
  • RugerNinerRugerNiner Member Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I beleive in most States less than an ounce of Pot is a Misdemeanor. If the crime is punishable by less than two years of Incarceration than you can still legally buy guns.

    Remember...Terrorist are attacking Civilians; Not the Government. Protect Yourself!
    Keep your Powder dry and your Musket well oiled.
    NRA Lifetime Benefactor Member.
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:During the home raid, authorities seized 0.42 ounces of marijuana from David LaVanway's bedroom. The amount would make no more than three joints, she said.

    Well I admit it has been many years since I've even smelled the stench of pot, but these would have to be some pretty damn big joints if they were only getting three out of a half an ounce.As far as their situation, while the law is not perfect it is still the law. If the amount in their possession is felony possession then there is a good case against them,legally to keep the guns. That still doesn't make the law right but until change is effected we are a nation of laws so just obey them. I think the big problem is going to be the charge of lying on a yellow form for gun purchase as well as any aplication he ever made for a CCW if he answered no to any history of drug use.

    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

    Edited by - josey1 on 09/16/2002 07:04:37

    Edited by - josey1 on 09/16/2002 07:06:50
  • RugerNinerRugerNiner Member Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Josey1;

    Ther is a provision on the yellow form for gun purchase. Max one year for felony and two years for misdemeanor.


    Section 922(g) of the GCA prohibits certain persons from shipping
    or transporting any firearm in interstate or foreign commerce, or
    receiving any firearm which has been shipped or transported in
    interstate or foreign commerce, or possessing any firearm in or
    affecting commerce. These prohibitions apply to any person who--
    (1) Has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by
    imprisonment for a term exceeding one year;

    Page 34636

    One State agency requested clarification whether an indictment for
    a crime classified as a misdemeanor, but punishable by a term of
    imprisonment exceeding 1 year, would fall within the definition.
    Section 921(a)(20) of the GCA provides that the term ``crime punishable
    by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year'' does not include any
    State offense classified by the laws of the State as a misdemeanor and
    punishable by a term of imprisonment of 2 years or less. The definition
    of indictment is being clarified in the regulations by adding a
    reference to the definition of ``crime punishable by imprisonment for a
    term exceeding one year.''




    Remember...Terrorist are attacking Civilians; Not the Government. Protect Yourself!
    Keep your Powder dry and your Musket well oiled.
    NRA Lifetime Benefactor Member.
  • ccasey612ccasey612 Member Posts: 901 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I gotta call a spade a spade. The law says you can not have drugs with guns and they did.

    If you will blame gun makers for every shooting then blame car maker for every car accident.
  • Ronald J. SnowRonald J. Snow Member Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    RugerNiner, one year.
  • NighthawkNighthawk Member Posts: 12,022 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Its not fair,but it is the Law.On a Federal Fire Arms Transaction it ask if you are an illegal user of Marijuanna.If you check yes you can not buy the gun.To legalise Marijuanna is another question?Now that it can be detected on Drivers Breathe a couple hours after use,and if it were legal people would not go to the trouble to grow it so it could be Taxed.So I think you know my opinion,but I cant say more. To ruin a mans life over 1/2 ounce of grass???

    Best!!!

    Rugster


    Toujours Pret

    Edited by - Rugster on 09/16/2002 08:43:59
  • doomsknight62doomsknight62 Member Posts: 239 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm going to have to agree with Rugster. When you make the concious decision to break the law, you are putting a lot of stuff at risk. Your life, your liberty, and your possessions. Not to mention the safety of others, at times. This is just the consequence of those actions, and they should learn to accept it.

    " God is in His Heaven, All is Right in the World. "
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Member Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If seeds cant grow without proper care how do you explain trees?

    There have been cases around here where the kid was tossing his roaches out of the bedroom window, only for dad to find a strange weed in the flowerbed. Did they lose the property? No, but in these days of gov. theft of private property its a very real possibility.

    I still think that if you want to win the drug war, fine the snot out of the average user. 2 months gross pay for a joint would put a fast crimp in the trade. No it wouldnt take them away from people who arent working, but most of the users have jobs.

    Those people who see nothing but grey areas, no black and white, are lost in the fog.
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,695 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Losing your guns over a half ounce of pot?Ridiculous. A drunk guy with a gun is much more dangerous than a stoned guy. Big govt. destroys individual rights through the "War on Drugs."
  • salzosalzo Member Posts: 6,396 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    the problem is, that they will seize his property without the beneifit of due process, and a trial. The assett forfeiture provisions allow the government to seize the property, without benefit of trial. Very often, even iftheir is eventually a trial, the accused does not get their property back. This happens often, all in the name of fighting the drug war, notwithstanding the fourth and fifth and sixth amendment.
    Nowhere in the constitution, does it say that the government can seize guns if you have dope. Nowhere in the constitution, does it say the government has a right to confiscate your property if you have drugs. In fact, nowhere in the constitution does it say the federal government can prohibit the posession of drugs.And it certainly does not say that the 4th 5th 6th amendments can be suspended if drugs, or drug money, is involved.
    This guy had his property seized by the Federal government, without due process. This just another example of the government not adhering to the constituion.

    "Sometimes the people have to give up some individual rights for the safety of society."
    -Bill Clinton(MTV interview)
  • concealedG36concealedG36 Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    B.S., pure and simple. If they take this guy's guns he will be unable to make a living. Why? Because he had a bad of weed! Crap, total crap. I feel really bad for this person. I think the U.S. Attorney's office is lazy. Why bother fighting REAL crime when you can take down an easy target? I watch stupid crack heads selling drugs out in the OPEN in Detroit at lunchtime. There are prostitutes walking around at all times of the day or night. Cops drive right past them all the time. But, this guy had some WEED!! Oh no, refer madness!

    Our world is really going down hill when a guy's life can be essentially ruined because he possessed a small amount of marijuana and they then go into his home to confiscate his property.

    The war on drugs is a total joke. Anybody who says that the USER (Varmintist) should be the victim doesn't realize that they already are! Our prisons are full of non-violent offenders who got caught with marijuana. Of course, this does fill the prisons up so to alleviate the crowding violent offenders (who are not victims of mandatory minimum sentencing B.S) are let free.




    Gun Control Disarms Victims, NOT Criminals
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Member Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Victim = B.S. Its a choice. WAA I just NEED to smoke dope WAAA. The pro-dopers always say that its not any worse than beer, and its not addictive. Well then you can quit, unless you are lying.

    I never said jail them anyhow, FINE them for pot and occasional use. Close the money stream from the small end. The "war" on drugs aint working because we ONLY go after the "big guy" I bet that a few 5000.00 fines for a joint or two will cause the desire to go away. Two or three months base pay wouldnt ruin a life, would make that year damn hard though. In a word, tough.

    IM SICK OF PAYING FOR OTHER PEOPLES MISTAKES. I bust my hump, have three kids, the wife stays home and homeschools and I dont get s#$t from anyone. No food stamps, welfare, nothing. Hate to break the news to some of you, but one of the nasty things about freedom is RESPONSIBILITY, and no one exept my immedite family is mine

    Now for the harder stuff. Work farms, saw some concrete barriers along the highway that were painted, looked nice. Would look better if they were painted coast to coast. Lots of middle management types in orange suits and brushes would place a crimp in the cash flow, maybe not the first time they get to paint, but after the third they might get the hint.

    If its leagel, fine. but it aint.

    I think that gov theft of personal property for whatever reason is a abomination without due prossese, and with due prossess its not much better.

    Those people who see nothing but grey areas, no black and white, are lost in the fog.

    Edited by - Varmintmist on 09/16/2002 10:09:44
  • Harleeman1030Harleeman1030 Member Posts: 1,505 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Some of the nicest and coolest people i know smoke dope..So you can fine all you want but i think it's a shame that someone loses it all because of a little refer.

    Hell it aint worked on drunk drivers yet now has it but let's put some more drunks on the road because it's legal to drink....I know dope ain't legal..But i see no good coming of this...

    I still see no reason for these folks to lose everything when we have drunk drivers killing people all the time..And don't get me wrong my kids father was killed by a driver that failed a piss test..So i am not on the let's make it legal tour.

    I just think 30,000 for less then 30.00 worth of weed is just plain crazy

    NRA MEMBER




    Edited by - harleeman1030 on 09/16/2002 10:06:24
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Member Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ok, same fines for DUI

    Those people who see nothing but grey areas, no black and white, are lost in the fog.
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ruger, as Rugster stated on that form you have to answer Yes or No to the question"Are you or have you ever been a user of an illegal narcotic". Since he answered no (because he would not be approved for purchase if he said yes), he in fact lied on the yellow form.

    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • boeboeboeboe Member Posts: 3,331
    edited November -1
    It's time to end the war on drugs, it isn't working.

    Sounds like there must have been a whole bunch of seeds in that to only make three joints.

    To err is human, to moo is bovine.
  • RugerNinerRugerNiner Member Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ronald J. Snow;

    I have been in Jail twice in the past 2 1/2 years, once I was sentenced up to 23 months in Prison. That was less than two and a half years ago.

    I have legally bought 9 guns since then and have a License to carry, and I carry a concealed weapon every day.

    I have had my bouts with the FBI and FDLE and won.
    If you have access to a yellow form read the part marked exceptions on the inside.


    Remember...Terrorist are attacking Civilians; Not the Government. Protect Yourself!


    Edited by - RugerNiner on 09/16/2002 13:32:34
    Keep your Powder dry and your Musket well oiled.
    NRA Lifetime Benefactor Member.
  • robsgunsrobsguns Member Posts: 4,581 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The idiot reporter that writes that silencers are illegal should be
    &!tch slapped for not knowing if what he is writing is correct, just writing to write. Silencers are perfectly legal if registered and paid for. Same goes for the automatic weapons, and the human form targets. I notice it doesnt say anywhere whether or not he might have had those types of guns registered even if they were present, in which case his nosy stinking neighbors were doing nothing but pissing in the wind because they didnt like guns, and nothing more. What happen to the days when slander was prosecutable?

    SSgt Ryan E. Roberts, USMC
  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Actually, I believe in Michigan (which is where this story is from)full auto and silencers Are illegal. I may be wrong about that one,anyone?

    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • concealedG36concealedG36 Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    In Michigan both devices are illegal unless you have a special license/permit. What is that called, class III or something? Ordinary citizens can not own these devices, no.



    Gun Control Disarms Victims, NOT Criminals
  • whiteclouderwhiteclouder Member Posts: 10,574 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Her story is full of holes. Of course it's the first time, it always is. What she means is, it's the first time she got caught. If she knew friends kept a stash in the house, she is aiding and abetting. It also puts lie to her `It's the first time.' claim. She also admits her father was a drug user.

    "Now," I can see her thinking, "who can I blame?" Aha, the dirty neighbors, conspiring and conniving to steal the family farm. Next thing we hear is she'll be tied to the railroad tracks.

    And she's never failed a state-mandated drug test. Wow, that's some real claim to fame. She should lose her school-bus driving job. She should be kept away from children entirely. We have lots of folks who aren't even suspected of drug use to choose from, we don't need her.

    Not very charitable I know, but when it comes to drugs, I'm not. She got caught, now she pays.

    Clouder..
  • lokdok1lokdok1 Member Posts: 383 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If you want to play the game , you've got to follow the rules!Guns, or pot-PICK ONE! The rest of us do.Pick one and stand down.

    If you don't know your rights, you dont't have any
  • 218Beekeep218Beekeep Member Posts: 3,033
    edited November -1
    How the hell does a traffic stop at 10th and vine,where they find "a small amount of marijuana" in yer purse, turn into a "home raid"?

    "a large truck with marijuana and human- shaped targets".

    Boy,we can`t have people shooting marijuana shaped targets,now can we?

    Either way ya look at it,
    if ya take take 36 of a fellers guns
    yer gunna blow his high.

    .218
  • stanmanstanman Member Posts: 3,052
    edited November -1
    Your last statement about sums it up .218.
    I'm still wondering about the 1/2 ounce of pot that only makes 3 joints??
    Yea,,, right!!
    Maybe if you bought lots of Cheech & Chong albums and saved the MONDO sized rolling paper that came with it!!
    Anybody else remember that??
    Anybody ever use it??


    The road to hell is paved with good intentions!
  • mcneely77mcneely77 Member Posts: 411 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have known Blaine for approximately 8 years and have never known him to be a pot head. Maybe that is because of the profession I had and the profession I am currently in, but he has never shown me any reason to believe he was a user. Obviously he or his wife is a user, but it was not obvious. Either way, he is a great guy. I do consider him a friend. Not that he didn't screw up in this instance. Tery, the Sodus Twp Officer that actually arrested him originally, is considered an a#$hole by many around here. I on the other hand find him to be extremely fair. He is the type of officer that goes by the book, weather he agrees with the book or not. I honestly believe that he is the type of officer that would write his mother for speeding just as fast as he would write me or a stranger.
    I think that Blaine is getting screwed, but I can't fault Terry for doing his job. If Terry was the type to let some people go for such a minor offense, if guns were not involved, I would have issue with him. But He is not the type of officer that was out looking for the big bust, or career boosting bust that some might think. Maybe the prosecutor is just trying to wipe egg off of his face because this was so highly publicized when the original arrests were made. I don't know.

    Do not mistake my kindness for weakness.

    IALEFI, ASLET, NRA, and proud owner of a pair of S&W revolvers.
  • Ronald J. SnowRonald J. Snow Member Posts: 1,346 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    RugerNiner, thank you for pointing that out to me about the misdemeanors on the state level.
Sign In or Register to comment.