In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

new home owner question .... tree trimming

GreenLanternGreenLantern Member Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭
edited September 2002 in General Discussion
I've got one large tree in my yard where the branches hang over into each neighbors yard. Are they responsible for trimming the branches that cross the property line and hang on their side or am I?

GL



Edited by - nunn on 09/24/2002 18:57:38

Comments

  • 4wheeler4wheeler Member Posts: 3,441
    edited November -1
    If it falls on your neighbors house or car,I am sure they will let you know.I do not know the legal answer.

    "It was like that when I got here".
  • DancesWithSheepDancesWithSheep Member Posts: 12,938 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ask the same question, only replace "tree" with "marijuana plant".

    Often the mind believes it is thinking, when it is only passing from one metaphor to the next.
  • SXSMANSXSMAN Member Posts: 2,616 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I know that when my neighbors tree lost a large limb in a storm (damaging my house and fence) it was my baby,not their insurance.

    Act of god my ...!



    Have guns,will travel
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Green Lantern:
    If your neighbors wish to trim branches that grow from your tree across your property line, you are powerless to stop them and you are not legally responsible to pay for the work they perform or hire to perform. They have the right to follow an imaginary line straight up from the property line and remove any encroaching limbs- up to the point of tree mutilation. You, however, are not required to allow or provide them access to the tree trunk if the limbs are not accessable to machinery ( bucket truck) in the event they would be forced to climb the tree.

    You are soley responsible for your tree ( all of it ) if a limb falls onto their grass with no damage, they could require you to remove it or pay for its removal. You are responsible for any damage your tree may do to their property including but not limited to: their vehicles, lawn, structures or underground services ( roots in pipes) or a large limb falling and cracking their driveway, sidewalk or septic tank. If you wish to have the tree trimmed you are not required to gain their permission to do so as you own the tree, despite any complaints they may have- neighbors always love large shade trees over their property when someone else is legally responsible for any damage they may suffer. However you or your hired contractor/arborist must gain their (written) permission to enter their property for cleanup or to bring equipment onto their property or to lower limbs onto their property.

    Hope it answers your question, probably not what you wanted to hear though. Most of the time I've found everyone can agree, while you/your insurance may be responsible, neighbors probably don't want to spend christmas in a hotel because their house was smashed by a evident hazard tree.

    If, in the event your tree causes property damage, you will not be found negligent if you are not an arborist and trained in identifying hazard trees, and the problem is not something a REASONABLE person could or would have deemed a REASONABLE cause for concern ( if the limb isn't split out and barely attached, hanging over their house, ect)

    No, I am not a lawyer, I am a practicing ISA certified Arborist and owner of a tree and landscaping company in so. Ohio. The laws may differ (SLIGHTLY) in your locale, but I doubt it, I attended the "trees, people and the law" seminar in 1999 given by Victor Merullo, a prominent green industry lawyer, and the National Arbor Day Foundation. This seminar is given nationally and this case:
    Murray vrs Heabron No a-95246 Ohio-1947 is used in the class and as the case study for the countrywide seminar. Its pretty much 'common law' although it may be on the books where you live.

    CYA- get the tree checked by a competent and reputable arborist if you have any doubts or if a neighbor has voiced concerns, a consultation would cost a minimal charge ( around 30-100 dollars depending on area and depth of inspection) and would cost much less than a negligence lawsuit defense. Be sure the get the arborist's opinion in writing.

    One last note: If the limbs reach close to the ground on their property line and if any child (18 or under) climbs the tree and is hurt by any means- YOU are responsible- EVEN IF THE CHILD WAS KNOWINGLY TRESPASSING AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT! Please read Huffman v Appalachian Power Company- Supreme Court-West Virginia No 20118 decided 19 DEC 1991 if this applys to your situation. Ralph



    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
  • timberbeasttimberbeast Member Posts: 1,738 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Rebjr. told you just about everything that you need to know!!
    I had a big Chinese Elm (giant weed) taken down a few years back due to the worries that I had about it being so huge (and a weak tree), and possibly falling on the neighbor's houses, which are a good 60-70 feet away from where the stump now is. I also agree with the advise about an arborist. I kin cuts down jest 'bout any tree ya kin find, and maybe even drive a stake in the ground to prove it fell where I wanted it to, BUT! I don't climb, and most of these trees have to be taken down from the top. Let the experts take care of that, they are worth every penny, if there's a goof, their insurance pays, and they'll probably be there for only a few hours, and you'll have lots of firewood bucked into 6 foot chunks when they leave, but that's up to the contract, we opted to clean up the brush and saw the "remains" into firewood by ourselves once it was on terra firma. They did the hard part, we did the long part....
    Like Reb said, the neighbors CAN trim them, even without your permission, but you are still the responsible party.
  • GreenLanternGreenLantern Member Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Thanks everyone, especially REBJr and timberbeast. Just the info I was looking for. The tree looks in good shape, I was mostly concerned about normal maintenance as a few the outermost parts of some smaller branches are close to touching the neighbors roofs. Visually the tree looks real good so my feeling is to shy away from having a expert look at it. I would be afraid of the outside chance that there's something wrong with it that only a specialist could find. Then, I'd be 'aware' of it have to correct the problem right away.

    GL
  • Smokeeater 38Smokeeater 38 Member Posts: 2,735
    edited November -1
    Last winter we had an ice storm come through. It took down lots of limbs and trees. One of the limbs was from one of my trees. It took out a part of the neighbor's fence and took down their electrical service entrance damaging the roof. Their insurance took care of it, Act of God. I live in Indiana. I do agree with parts about trimming the limbs that cross the property line.

    A lot of problems can be avoided if you talk to you neighbors and are lucky enough to get along with them. I patched up the fence the next day so they could let the dog out. They appreciated this very much.


    I rush in where others flee.
  • 4GodandCountry4GodandCountry Member Posts: 3,968
    edited November -1
    Last year a tree in my yard was struck by lightning. It split and half fell accross the ally behind my house and destroyed my fence and the peoples fence behind me as well. I called my insurance and told them what happened and they told me they would pay for my fence but not the other persons because they were responsible for their own property. I was quite shocked that it was not my responsability to remove the tree and pay for damages.

    When Clinton left office they gave him a 21 gun salute. Its a damn shame they all missed....
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,692 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Reb- Unless the laws are different here in Ga. from your state, you have got me confused. We have 3 houses here and have had to deal with many problems of trees falling. The person whose property is damaged is responsible for paying for the damage and removal of the tree, regardless of where the tree grew. The exception is if the tree was obviously unhealthy, was dead etc where a reasonable person could have expected the tree to fall. Now you say "You are soley responsible for your tree...if a limb falls on to their grass they could require you to remove it. You are responsible for any damage your tree may do to their property." Reb this is the opposite of the way this works here in Ga. But then you say that if your tree causes property damage you will not be found negligent if there was not damage already visible to the tree which a reasonable person would have seen. Smoke eater and 4God and Country have come in with posts which go along with the laws here in Ga.



    Edited by - allen griggs on 09/24/2002 14:49:01
  • VarmintmistVarmintmist Member Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    In Pa, my father in law tried to get the homeowner to pay for damage to his car after a storm by a limb. Act of God, father in law gets to pay.

    Those people who see nothing but grey areas, no black and white, are lost in the fog.
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Green --
    If you have that much tree, I'd do some trimming over my neighbors' yards to avoid the problem getting worse. I've had mature trees on property and I really didn't want to hassle my neighbors with low hanging branches, so I got the necessary cutting toosl and did some trimming where the branches overhung the neighbors' yards. It just seemed like the neighborly thing to do. I also checked to be sure my branches didn't interfere with their cable or electric lines coming from the pole to their roof. Those inexpensive saws with the jagged teeth work great, and you can put them on a long pole to get up higher without a ladder.

    - Life NRA Member
    "If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
  • Brth729Brth729 Member Posts: 1,231 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hey GreenLantern. So you say you have a problem with a tree? It really doesn't sound like much of a problem. Seems to me that it could be taken care of it with a little homemade C-4. Only bad thing about that is your neighbors would probably be POed at you for disturbing the peace.

    ***I'm in the hi-fidelity first class travelling section I think I need a Leer jet***
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Kinda saw this one comming. I left out the part about act of god/nature. Didn't seem important while I was writing the previous post. Ice storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, ect kinda usually trump the deck, and the persons' own homeowner insurance will take care of it, along with the 14 other things that happened to their property during this act of nature. I also stated that your laws may differ, that I doubted it, but it is possible.

    Ask anyone who deals with trees when a bad tree will fall, its not during that 50+ mph windstorm you had, but on a bright clear day with no wind- odd, but I've seen it too many times. Those times are when you need to have covered your *, not during acts of nature beyond the norm and beyond our control.

    Mr Griggs, be thankful you have decent neighbors, you are in the minority.

    There's no laws I know of that state people must always 'get along and be neighborly' but there are laws that state who are at fault when all else fails. Those I posted are some I deal with daily.

    As always, there are situations that don't follow the set patterns, and laws are always being updated to include these new circumstances.
    I listed the most common problems in the hope that if there were concerns on GreenLantern's part that he would have enough knowledge to make an imformed decision as to have a specialist look deeper.
    Hope it helps-Ralph

    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Mr Griggs, I just re-read your post and I missed one of your questions. I hate to sound like Klinton here, but there is a large difference between being finacially responsible for your property causing damage to others property, and causing damage or injury due to your negligence. Just because you may be finacially responsible for damages doesn't mean that you were negligent, and therefore liable to end up facing a criminal or civil suit, but being negligent opens you up to a "whole nother world of hurt." -Ralph

    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,692 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Reb I didn't make myself clear. I didn't mean that the neighbor whose property the tree fell on cleaned it up because he was a nice guy. The guy whose property the tree fell on got stuck with paying for it. I am familiar with 8 or 10 cases of trees falling and in every case it was the problem of who it landed on, not the tree owner.
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,692 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Reb I wrote the above post before I read your post of 18:15. Anyway thanks for clearing up the part about negligence that wasn't Clintonesque. My brother is a lawyer I will ask him about this.
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Mr Griggs, I would be very interested in learning if there have been changes I am unaware of to the law, and if maybe it's just the difference in the state laws of 2 states. This is highly important to me, as I face it in my line of work. Please let us know what your brother says. -Ralph

    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
  • GreenLanternGreenLantern Member Posts: 1,647 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Hey Brth729, I'd have to have one big chunk of homemade C4!

    To satisfy my own curiosity I went out and measured the tree last night. At the narrowest point at the trunk it measured 17' all the way around, then it spreads out into 3 or 4 main branches. This thing is so tall that I don't know if a saw-pole would even reach high enough. As it stands right now I'd almost have to get on the neighbors roofs to do any trimming and unfortunately it crosses the power lines to my house and each neighbor on each side.

    The tree doesn't really need trimming right now but what prompted my initial question was just after we moved in, my girlfriend came in the house and said she had just met the next door neighbor. She said that the neighbor had trimmed the tree for now but we'd have to eventually do it. I don't know how that original conversation went and what was said to give my girlfiend the idea that we had to do the trimming but I was under the impression that any part of the tree that was on their side then it was their responsibility to trim it. I justed wanted to get some opinions before any serious issue arises from it.

    GL
  • allen griggsallen griggs Member Posts: 35,692 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Reb I just spoke with my brother the lawyer on the phone. He says that here in Ga. if you have a nice healthy tree and a limb breaks off and falls on the neighbor's house it is the problem of the person whose property the tree landed on, not the tree owner. It doesn't matter if it happens during a hurricane, or on a calm sunny day. The exception is if the tree looked diseased and to a reasonable person it looked like it was going to fall soon. I guess you have different law in Ohio. As to the insurance angle, brother says that the insurance companies here are under no responsibility to do preventive work. During Hurricane Opel in 1995 his neighbor's pine tree got uprooted. But it didn't fall, it got stuck in the branches of an oak in my brother's yard. It was obviously going to fall and land on my brother's house, as soon as the wind blew it good. This was a 95 foot Georgia yellow pine, about 2foot diameter, no branches for the first 50 feet, this tree would have chopped my brother's house in half. He got his family out of the house and eventually had them spend 2 nights in a motel. He called his insurance co. and they told him they would do nothing until the tree fell. He told them they were looking at $40 grand in damage if it fell but the insurance said they wouldn't touch it until it fell. Brother got a tree guy to take it down for $640. and he had to pay it, the neighbor who owned it was not responsible for paying and insurance wouldn't pay a dime.
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    All I can say is wow, what a difference in laws-Ralph

    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    All I can say is wow, what a difference in laws-Ralph

    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
  • REBJrREBJr Member Posts: 1,210 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Sorry for the 2 shot burst- said server timed out so I hit it again-Ralph

    Nothing very, very good or very, very bad lasts for very, very long.
Sign In or Register to comment.