In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

The New Underclass

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited February 2002 in General Discussion
The New Underclass Paul Craig Roberts Feb. 20, 2002 Florence King's column is the best reason for reading National Review. Her "Misanthrope's Corner," placed on the magazine's last page, makes National Review a publication that is read from back to front.In her latest (Feb. 25), Miss King relates the relief expressed by her driving instructor when he discovered she was Miss King and not Miss Ling: "Last slant I had put us both in the hospital."The driving school's secretary had hit "L" instead of "K" on the typewriter key, sending the instructor into a fit of panic and hypertension. Relieved from the fear instilled by a typo, the instructor gave Miss King his views on why Asians should not be permitted to operate motor vehicles.This incident occurred, of course, in the distant past - 1974. That was a year when Americans still had freedom of speech, the exercise of which had not yet been turned into a hate crime by what Miss King lampoons as "the MultiCulties."Nowadays, writes Miss King, "my instructor would automatically assume that the white stranger beside him was an avenging angel of diversity tuned to a perpetual frequency of High Snitch. He would know that one little 'hate speech' is all it would take to get fired, sued, and condemned to wander through the secular purgatory of community service while the talk shows debated his status as Satan Incarnate."Miss King's observations were still in mind when I read reports of the arrest this month of 10 black teen-agers for a series of racial attacks on white University of Virginia students in Charlottesville. According to police, the attacks were not a town-gown conflict, nor were the assaults motivated by rape or robbery. The students were simply beaten for being white.The national media are too politically correct to report black-on-white hate crimes, which leaves Americans ignorant of the growing incidence of such crimes. Local newspapers sometimes report these crimes if they occur within the city limits. Otherwise, there are only the police reports.The politically correct Charlottesville mayor, Blake Caravati, is busily at work adjusting the facts. In Mayor Caravati's MultiCulti-speak, the crimes have become "incidents." Charlottesville's political leader also dismissed the description, given by the police and the assailants themselves, of the physical assaults as "race-based." Whether the beatings were racially motivated, says his honor, is "yet to be determined by the Commonwealth's Attorney."The mayor went on to express his sympathy for the assailants and their families, who, unlike the victims, are local residents and voters.The white students were lucky they were set upon and beaten before they had time to open their mouths. If the black assailants had been smarter, they could have given the whites a jail term instead of a beating.If, instead of delivering blows, the black assailants had informed the whites of what they thought of their girlfriends and mothers, they might have stirred enough anger to elicit verbal responses, perhaps even the n-word, that would qualify as hate speech. Maybe a white student would even have - heaven forbid - struck a black tormentor.Goaded into committing hate crimes, the arrested whites would be national news, and Mayor Caravati would not be making apologies for them.Miss King is correct that her driving instructor can no longer express his views on Asian driving students. This same inhibition means that no white can respond in kind to verbal assaults from a "protected minority" without being arrested for a hate crime.Racial privilege is a fact of U.S. law. Recently in Idaho, a white husband was arrested by white police, prosecuted by a white prosecutor, convicted by a white jury, and sentenced to jail by a white judge for coming to the defense of his white wife, who was physically assaulted by a black male. You can read all about it on www.vdare.com. The black's physical assault on the wife was minor, but the husband's verbal assault was not. The enraged husband used the n-word.White males had best give up any idea of defending their women or themselves, and women should not confuse their men's aversion to jail with cowardice. America has returned to the feudal age when legally privileged nobles could assault commoners at will, but woe to any commoner who returned the compliment.This extraordinary inequality is what we owe to the civil rights movement, white male presidents, white legislators and white attorneys general. http://www.newsmax.com/commentmax/articles/Paul_Craig_Roberts.shtml

Comments

  • BullzeyeBullzeye Member Posts: 3,560
    edited November -1
    If I was to walk through Compton at 2:30 AM I'd almost certainly be beaten and robbed, and possibly killed.Why? Because I'm white and white people are weak in the hood. I'm a fool for going there when I have no business going into their turf.But if a black man was to do the same thing and be beaten by a white man, it would make papers all over the country and they'd have the police riot squads out looking for the hatemonger who did it.
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Yes, being beaten by 5 individuals because your skin is paler than theirs is a very interesting experience. Maybe I will divulge sometime.
  • niklasalniklasal Member Posts: 776 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    This is an issue that needs to be taken with a grain of salt. It IS unfair that someone gets into more trouble for saying a bad word than for hitting someone, but our society is trying to find a racial equilibrium. It wasn't that long ago that blacks were run down by mobs and hung from trees. That was an atrocity that no one want to remember, so references to it are treated very harshly. I think the true problem is in this quest for balance. Black people of the pre-civil rights movements WERE oppressed. Those alive DURING it fought hard for to get basic civil rights. Progress has been made by them, but a few young men of this generation have not realized that progress was made through hard times, and feel something is owed to them. I think that would be the case of those potential Compton thugs. That, coupled with popular music glorifying "thug" lifestyle does not help.Just my thoughts. Sorry if I strayed a bit from subject...
    NIKLASAL@hotmail.com
  • edharoldedharold Member Posts: 465 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Good post NiklaslWhen I was a young man growing up in Idaho,"In the good old days of freedon of speech" "Orientals" were not allowed to obtain any professional license, and only in limited instances were they allowed to have drivers' licenses.
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety"Benj. Franklin, 1759
Sign In or Register to comment.