In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Drugs squad fumes as bookshop shields reader

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited January 2002 in General Discussion
Drugs squad fumes as bookshop shields reader Prize-winning US writers queue up to defend privacy of customer who bought Uncle Fester's illicit manual Lawrence Donegan in San FranciscoSunday January 13, 2002The Observer It never won a Pulitzer or appeared on the New York Times bestseller lists but a 400-page book about the manufacture of illicit drugs by an author known as Uncle Fester is at the centre of a legal battle over the privacy of the US book-buying public. In what has been described as a landmark case for the US book industry, the Tattered Cover bookshop in Denver, Colorado, has spent 18 months resisting the attempts of both police and courts to obtain the identity of a customer who purchased Uncle Fester's opus, Advanced Techniques of Clandestine Drug Laboratories . Many of the country's most celebrated authors, publishers and booksellers are supporting the shop, which has argued that handing over the information would be a serious attack on free speech. 'There is a right to privacy in this country and that includes the right to read what we like without government interference,' says award-winning novelist Michael Chabon. 'If the police get what they are after in this case, what is to stop them demanding to know all sorts of things - like who has been reading books about any subject the authorities deem to be 'dangerous', such as religious beliefs that don't fit into the so-called mainstream.' Chabon, who won the Pulitzer last year for his novel The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay, is one of several leading writers, including David Eggers, Dorothy Allison and the children's book author Daniel Handler, who have giving financial support to the Tattered Cover's legal defence fund, along with the American Booksellers' Foundation. 'People shop in bookstores on the understanding that their choices are confidential,' says Chris Finan, president of the ABF's Foundation for Free Expression. 'There are a lot of books about subjects - mental health, sexual dysfunction - that we do not want our wives or husbands to know we've been reading about. If people know the police can get that kind of information they will not shop for those books.' The case centres on a raid by drug enforcement officers at a trailer park near Denver in March last year. The Uncle Fester book and another called Advanced Techniques of Clandestine Psychedelic Drug Laboratories were found inside a trailer owned by a man suspected of operating a methamphetamine lab. An envelope discovered in his rubbish bin contained an invoice from the Tattered Cover. The following day four plainclothes officers arrived at the shop with a search warrant, demanding to know if the books were bought there and, if so, by whom. The shop's owner, Joyce Meskis, refused to provide the information. 'It is not our job to do the police's work for them,' she said. Denver police then asked that it enforce the subpoena. At a subsequent hearing, lawyers for the bookshop argued the police had failed to interview other witnesses who could have helped convict the suspect. Details of a customer's purchasing record were not sufficiently important to the criminal case to justify the 'chilling effect' that releasing such information would have on the right to free speech enshrined in the First Amendment, they said. However, the court upheld the police request - a decision which has been challenged by the shop's owners in the State's Supreme Court. A ruling on the appeal is expected in the next few weeks. The case has echoes of that brought by Kenneth Starr against two bookshops in Washington DC during his investigation into the Monica Lewinsky 'scandal'. When it emerged that Lewinsky - who was said to have given President Clinton several books as presents - was a regular customer at the shops, Starr demanded to see her purchase records. The shops' owners resisted his request, but the case never reached court after Lewinsky struck a deal with the former Independent Counsel. Finan said yesterday there was a growing problem with authorities seeking private information from bookshops. 'I'm afraid this may be a bad idea whose time has come, and the chilling effect on publishing could be very serious indeed. In the Lewinsky case, a false rumour went around that the bookshops were going to comply with Starr's request. The effect of that was they saw a big fall-off in business. People trust bookstores to protect them. If they don't have that trust, they will not shop there.' The Tattered Cover, spread over four floors in downtown Denver, is a required stop on the book tour schedule for every bestselling author and has a reputation for stocking radical, independently published books that have little chance of finding shelf space in chain stores such as Borders and Barnes and Noble. Meskis said she had been heartened by the support she and her staff had received from writers, publishers and the public. More than 400 people turned up at a fund-raising event at a San Francisco bookshop last night. 'Like us, they realise that everyone in society has to do what they can to uphold the rule of law but that we also have an obligation to the community to protect the constitution. When you have one responsibility bumping up against another, then that's when the courts should decide.' http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,631945,00.html

Comments

  • will270winwill270win Member Posts: 4,845
    edited November -1
    I would never buy such garbage, but what gives anyone the right to know who bought it. Are they going to arrest him or something? So now we are going to have to start the national free sppech association to keep us from being arrested for buying books. What garbage we have to deal with!
    If you can't fix it with a hammer, take it to a mechanic. will270win@aol.com ~Secret Select Society Of Suave Stylish Smoking Jackets~
  • ndbillyndbilly Member Posts: 1,573 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    If rulings such as these are allowed to stand then there truly is a "Slippery Slope" doctrine to consider. Check out the offerings from Paladin Press, for example. The old "Anarchist's Cookbook", "The Poor Man's James Bond", books on how to make explosives in a home kitchen, how to construct sound suppressors, etc., could easily become banned. I am as passionate about this topic as I am about the Second Amendment. It's no one's business, especially the f*****g government's, what I read. If I break a law by constructing and/or using an illegal device or substance, that's a separate matter. Reading about such things is not, nor should it ever be, illegal.
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I don't recall anything in the Constitution saying we can only think / read / say what is approved by the authorities. If this makes it to DC, it will be a 9-0 against the police. I'm utterly amazed they've pushed it this far . . . probably hoping to force the shop into bankruptcy for having the audacity to resist their demands. What a waste of resources!
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It is hard to believe that any attorney would try to push this so far. It's a slam dunk on First Amendment precedent. Either they expect to drive the shop into bankruptcy for having the audacity to resist Big Brother or they think the courts will support them all the way. I can't see Rehnquist buying this, much less any of the more liberal Justices. 9-0 if it goes to DC.
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It is hard to believe that any attorney would try to push this so far. It's a slam dunk on First Amendment precedent. Either they expect to drive the shop into bankruptcy for having the audacity to resist Big Brother or they think the courts will support them all the way. I can't see Rehnquist buying this, much less any of the more liberal Justices. 9-0 if it goes to DC.
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    It is hard to believe that any attorney would try to push this so far. It's a slam dunk on First Amendment precedent. Either they expect to drive the shop into bankruptcy for having the audacity to resist Big Brother or they think the courts will support them all the way. I can't see Rehnquist buying this, much less any of the more liberal Justices. 9-0 if it goes to DC.
  • competentonecompetentone Member Posts: 4,696 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have to wonder if the "publishing community" would rally the same if the police were seeking information about who purchased a book on the illegal conversion of semi-auto to full-auto guns?Protecting drug user's rights is "politically correct" in some circles--not the same for firearm owner's rights.(I wonder if The Tattered Cover bookstorehas a selection like Paladin offers?)
  • concealedG36concealedG36 Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I seem to recall learning something about book burnings in history class. As I recall, the outcome was catastrophic. The government has no right to censor what I read (or know what I read for that matter). An ignorant populace is more dangerous than an educated one, by far...G36
    Gun Control Disarms Victims, NOT Criminals
Sign In or Register to comment.