The Real Deal on 9:11: Rewarding Failure

Josey1

The Real Deal on 9:11: Rewarding Failure
Friday, 31 May 2002, 10:24 am
Column: Catherine Austin Fitts

The numerous allegations regarding fraud, government sponsored narcotics trafficking and black budget funding over the last two decades at the Department of Defense and the Department of Housing and Urban Development are deeply disturbing. Originally published in Global Outlook, a magazine published by Centre for Research on Globalisation**.

The Real Deal on 9:11: Rewarding Failure

BY CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS*
On September 11, America experienced a national security failure. Despite America's annual investment of approximately $350 billion in what is supposed to be the world's finest military and intelligence capacity, some 3,000 people died as the world watched helplessly. An hour after the first act of war, the Department of Defense could not protect its own headquarters.

Shortly after 9-11, American taxpayers were informed that this failure was a result of our having too much freedom and not enough military and intelligence capacity and resources. We underwrote a $48 billion increase in the defense budget and passed legislation that removed many constitutionally guaranteed freedoms. Meantime, the press reported efforts by foreign governments to warn us of the impending attacks as well as pre-9-11 reports of insider trading patterns in stocks of companies adversely impacted by these tragic events - and no similar trading patterns in other stocks in the same industries.

Soon after 9-11 came the Enron bankruptcy and revelations of massive fraud by a company that played a pivotal role in determining American energy and foreign policy - indeed, even being delegated the power to interview and choose the government official who would be its regulator. Until the Enron revelations, it was hard for most Americans to comprehend the magnitude of Washington's corruption. Conservatives create conservative justifications to give out government contracts and subsidies that reward the powers that be. Progressives create progressive justifications to do the same. Government "policy" is engineered to generate those contracts, subsidies and regulations that fatten banking and corporate profits and "pump and dump" the stock market. When the Enron game was up, insiders sold their stock at the top of the market to our pension plans, which take the losses when the stock goes bust.

The estimated $500 billion to $1 trillion of money laundering each year through the US financial system translates into significant influence in all sectors of our economy and government.[1] In 1998, the CIA Inspector General issued a report that confirmed the complicity of the CIA and Department of Justice in marketing narcotics into American cities. A deeper look reveals that the Clinton and Bush families were partners in bringing in Iran Contra arms and drugs through a little airport in Mena, Arkansas. The very same Wall Street investment houses and banks that acted as investors in, and lenders to, fraudulent Enron ventures also fed at the Mena, Arkansas trough. Numerous of the current Bush appointees were complicit in these Iran-Contra activities. Whether Democrat or Republican, we have a government controlled by people who financed their rise to power by threatening the lives of innocent civilians. Are these the type of people who worry about the safety of ordinary Americans? I think not.

The financial questions are troubling, as the federal financial books appear to be as "cooked" as Enron's. US citizens pay federal taxes of $5,324 every year for every man, woman and child.[2] Of that amount, $4,835, or approximately 85% is spent by eleven agencies that cannot produce reliable financial systems or audits.[3] The Departments of Defense (DOD) and Housing and Urban Development (HUD), with Lockheed Martin as their lead contractor, are missing over $3.3 trillion between fiscal 1998-2000.[4] The numerous allegations regarding fraud, government sponsored narcotics trafficking and black budget funding over the last two decades at both DOD and HUD are deeply disturbing.

In the summer of 2000, a senior staffer for the Senate HUD appropriations subcommittee asked me what I thought was going on at HUD. I deferred. The staffer said, "HUD is being run as a criminal enterprise." HUD cannot be run as a criminal enterprise without Lockheed taking a lead role. With Lockheed's stock up over 60% since 9-11, as a result of new War on Terrorism- related contracts, it is time to ask where the loyalty of government contractors lies.

We are awarding rich financial bonuses to those who failed 3,000 men, women and children and their families and the country which it was their sacred duty to defend. The time has come for Americans to investigate what happened on 9-11, including the reports of prior knowledge and insider trading. We must insist on full Internet access and disclosure of all federal contracts and bank accounts, by both agency and geographical location, and ownership of all private government contractors and U.S. Treasury bank depositories.

The time has come to hold those in control accountable to the citizens whom they are paid to serve. The time has come to stop rewarding failure.


* + * + *
Notes:

1. Estimate by the U.S. Department of Justice.

2. Based on 1999 IRS statistics and the April 2000 Census.

3. Agencies based on Senator Fred Thompson's report "Government on the Brink" and Congressman Horn's annual report card on federal agency audits in fiscal 2000. Amounts based on the President's 2002 budget before the 9-11 increases.

4. Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld confirmed in a Congressional testimony that the Department of Defense had undocumentable adjustments in one year of $2.3 trillion.

- * Catherine Austin Fitts is the President of Solari, Inc. ( http://solari.com) and a former Assistant Secretary of Housing - Federal Housing Commissioner in the first Bush Administration. She publishes a column on Scoop which is distributed for free by email - see... Free My Scoop to sign up.
http://www.scoop.co.nz/mason/stories/HL0205/S00173.htm


"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Josey1

Narco-Candidate
In Colombia

Uribe's Rise from Medell?n:
Precursor to a Narco-State
His Campaign Manager, the DEA,
and the Case of the 50,000 Kilos
By Al Giordano
A Narco News Investigative Report
Part I in a Series
For Part II, Click Here
In 1997 and 1998, alert U.S. Customs agents in California seized three suspicious Colombia-bound ships that, the agents discovered, were laden with 50,000 kilos of potassium permanganate, a key "precursor chemical" necessary for the manufacture of cocaine.
According to a document signed by then-DEA chief Donnie R. Marshall on August 3, 2001, the ships were each destined for Medell?n, Colombia, to a company called GMP Productos Quimicos, S. A. (GMP Chemical Products).
The 50,000 kilos of the precursor chemical destined for GMP were enough to make half-a-million kilos of cocaine hydrochloride, with a street value of $15 billion U.S. dollars.
The owner of GMP Chemical Products, according to the 2001 DEA chief's report, is Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, the campaign manager, former chief of staff, and longtime right-hand-man for front-running Colombian presidential candidate Alvaro Uribe V?lez.
Mr. Moreno was Uribe's political alter-ego before, during and after those nervous 1997 and 1998 months when he awaited those contraband shipments.
When Uribe was governor of the state of Antioquia from 1995 to 1997 - from its capitol of Medell?n - Moreno was chief of staff in Governor Uribe's office. During those years, according to then-DEA chief Marshall, ""Between 1994 and 1998, GMP was the largest importer of potassium permanganate into Colombia."
This is the story of the Narco-Candidate, Alvaro Uribe, whose 1982 election as mayor of Medell?n, whose 1995 election as governor of Antioquia and whose pending ascendance this year to the presidency of Colombia each mark new chapters in the evolution of the modern Narco-State.
Three ships set sail for Medell?n, and in their wake, the facts.
On The Waterfront in
Oakland and Long Beach
On November 17, 1997, a Chinese ship carrying 20,000 kilos of potassium permanganate - the aforementioned cocaine precursor chemical - destined for Moreno's GMP company in Colombia, pulled into the docks at Long Beach, California.
A month later, on December 16, 1997, another Chinese ship, docked in Oakland, also destined for the Uribe campaign manager's company in Medell?n, carried another 20,000 kilos of the cocaine precursor chemical.
And, like clockwork, one month after that, on January 17, 1998, a third ship stopped in Long Beach on its way to Moreno's GMP, this one carrying 10,000 kilos of the controlled substance.
"The United States Customs Service (USCS) seized each of these shipments as they transited the ports in California," noted DEA chief Marshall. "No advance notice was filed with DEA that these shipments would be sent from Hong Kong, through the United States, to Colombia."
According to a U.S. law titled 21 U.S.C. 971(a), "each regulated person who imports or exports a listed chemical to or from the United States is required to file advance notification of the importation or exportation not later than 15 days before the transaction is to take place."
The matter of cocaine precursor chemicals, and potassium permanganate in particular, is no small matter to law enforcers.
As Colombia's current president, Andr?s Pastrana, noted in a press release on October 25, 1999: "Without the coca plant, there is no cocaine, but without acetone, ether and permanganate, it is impossible to have drugs. A good part of these precursors come from Europe and are dumped into our rivers and our land, which produces part of the world's oxygen."
Oxygen, like that which Pastrana gave Uribe and Moreno this week, when the president's Conservative party - destroyed in the recent Colombian congressional elections, precisely because of Pastrana's support for the US military adventure known as Plan Colombia - folded its tent, abandoned its own presidential candidate, and threw its support to the Narco-Candidate Uribe.
Quietest Seizure
in DEA History
Just as the coca plant does not grow in the North American mainland, permanganate is not produced in South America. Cocaine as we know it would not be possible without this U.S., European and Chinese export chemical.
For the cocaine processing labs in the Amazon jungle, permanganate is harder to obtain, and thus more vital than even to coca leaf for the production of cocaine.
Normally, when U.S. officials seize a massive quantity of a controlled substance, the press and TV cameras are called and grand proclamations are made about the "record seizures" and "victory" in the war on drugs.
But the political problems caused by these seizures in California caused the usually boastful U.S. authorities to refrain from their usual media blitz.
Contrast that with the government press releases customarily aimed at U.S. companies that fail -- as the Uribe campaign manager's company did in '97 and '98 -- to notify the DEA of shipments of permanganate. United States companies caught violating the same laws have paid a steep legal price.
The Connecticut-based chemical firm MacDermid Inc., according to the January 14, 2000 edition of the Hartford Courant, paid $50,000 dollars to the federal government "to settle a claim involving the export of a chemical that can be used to synthesize cocaine, the U.S. attorney's office said Thursday."
The $50,000 fine was paid, according to the Courant, because "the company failed to notify the government in advance that it was going to export more than 500 kilograms per month of potassium permanganate."
"MacDermid sold the chemical to legitimate buyers," reported the daily Courant. "The government says its only lapse was a failure to make a necessary notification of its export sales."
In other words, for failing to alert the DEA that it would make shipments of 500 kilos of the cocaine precursor chemical - one percent of the 50,000 kilos destined for Moreno's company in Colombia - the Connecticut company had to pay $50,000. (That fine, if applied equally to Moreno's 50,000 kilos, would have added up to $5 million U.S. dollars.)
Moreno's company, by contrast, was not fined a single devalued Colombian peso by the United States government for those 50,000 unreported kilos of the cocaine precursor.
Still, U.S. authorities, tangled in the crisis caused by the seizures of contraband belonging to a political ally of Washington, after three years of tossing this hot potato around, determined not to release the stash.
The Customs Service, the DEA and other U.S. law enforcement agencies were caught in a public relations disaster. Their agents did their job. And the bureaucrats in Washington spent more than three years trying to cover it up.
To apply the law equally to Moreno's GMP Chemical Products company - as the Justice Department did with the Connecticut firm's legal lapse - would have unleashed a chain of events very embarrassing to Moreno and, consequently, to the 1995-97 governor of the Colombian state of Antioquia: Alvaro Uribe V?lez, a longtime U.S. point-man in Colombia.
But to apply the law equally would have caused headlines that interfered with Washington's electoral plans for Colombia, which have been executed to weaken all other potential candidates (those that are still alive or not in captivity) and install Uribe as the next Colombian president in the May 26th elections.
Uribe is their man.

Precursor to
a Narco-State
DEA chief Donnie Marshall wrote, in a legal decision, about the seizure of the contraband headed toward Uribe's campaign manager, and his company, GMP:
"The Order to Suspend Shipment stated that DEA believed that the listed chemical may be diverted based on the failure to notify DEA of the transshipment in violation of 21 CFR 1313.31; associations between GMP and other violating chemical companies in Colombia; and other diversionary practices of GMP."
But Marshall, Bill Clinton's DEA chief, had a big headache. The eagle-eyed Customs officers in Long Beach and Oakland perhaps were not aware yet that they had stepped on the wrong narco-toes: three ships whose voyage was not meant to be interrupted.
Donnie Marshall, the DEA boss, explained why:
"GMP is a company founded in 1938 that distributes chemical products, with four locations throughout Colombia, South America. Its president, Pedro Juan Moreno Villa (Mr. Moreno), has served on the board of directors of other companies in Colombia. In addition, from 1995 through 1997, Mr. Moreno served as the Secretary of the Government of Antioquia."
That state government, it bears repeating, belonged to Governor Alvaro Uribe, the current presidential heir apparent in Colombia, whose path to Colombia's highest office began in the City of Medell?n, in 1982, when its unofficial mayor, Pablo Escobar, the most notorious drug trafficker in human history, was the undisputed King of the City: Nothing happened in Medell?n, in 1982, without Escobar's permission. One of the things that did happen, was that Alvaro Uribe became its official mayor, and from there toiled in the laboratory of the then-nascent Narco-State.
"An extensive security investigation of Mr. Moreno was conducted for this position" in Uribe's administration, wrote the DEA chief. "During his tenure, Mr. Moreno supported the Govenor's goal to fight narcotics traffic. According to Mr. Moreno, his life was endangered because of his duties against drug traffickers and guerillas, resulting in his taking extensive security precautions."
The security precautions taken by Governor Uribe's chief secretary Moreno, though, were apparently not sufficient to keep three of his unreported shipments from being seized on the California coast.
Honest Customs and DEA agents saw their own life-endangering actions subverted and sabotaged by the suits in Washington. The permanganate traffickers - not content to be on the road to the Colombian presidency, but wanting to collect their tips, too - fought from early 1998 until mid-2001, in a case before DEA administrative law judge Gail Randall, to avoid legal penalties and to get their 50,000 kilos back.
"No advance notice of these shipments was provided to DEA by GMP or any other party," wrote DEA chief Marshall. "However, there is a dispute over whether such advance notice was required for these shipments."
It was that greed on the part of the cocaine precursor traffickers that now has led to this trail of paper, and that forced Donnie Marshall to make these words a part of the public record.
Perhaps because he was at the end of his term, or perhaps because his own troops - the DEA agents - were already furious with the bureaucratic cover-ups regarding these seizures, or, perhaps because Donnie Marshall wanted to do something right before his legacy at DEA came to an end, Marshall rejected the non-binding recommendation of the administrative law judge, and ordered the 50,000 kilos permanently seized.
Marshall, the administrator, ruled:
"The Administrator finds that based upon the evidence in the record, Colombia produces between 70-80% of the world's cocaine hydrochloride. Potassium permanganate and hydrochloric acid are List II chemicals that may be used for a variety of legitimate purposes, but are also used in the illicit manufacture of cocaine. Potassium permanganate is not produced in South America and therefore must be imported.
"Between 1994 and 1998, GMP was the largest importer of potassium permanganate into Colombia. Since approximately 1994, GMP conducted business with Eland, a Hong Kong company. From 1996 through 1998, Eland's sale of potassium permanganate to GMP had become consistent, with Eland selling GMP in excess of 200 metric tons during that time."
Kind reader, click your calculator. One kilo of potassium permanganate makes 10 kilos of cocaine. GMP's excess of 200 metric tons was sufficient to make 2,000 metric tons of cocaine hydrochloride.
A key fact, though, upon which the Narco-State is built, should be kept in mind: There are other, legal, uses for potassium permanganate, such as to manufacture printed circuit boards and other hi-tech playthings that are not exactly staples of the Colombian economy. This is one of the key loopholes through which the $500 billion dollar-a-year illicit drug industry glides.
Likewise, there are other uses for the humble coca leaf, too. But the U.S. Ambassador to Bolivia calls legal coca farmers "terrorists." In Colombia and Ecuador, U.S. helicopters and airplanes spray toxic herbicides over those farmers. Given the central importance of potassium permanganate to cocaine manufacturing, Andean peasants would be as justified in sending those choppers and airplanes to Oakland and Long Beach harbors to blow up the ships. The double standards, and selective enforcement, by U.S. officials have eternally doomed the "war on drugs."
Uncontrolled Substances
Still, DEA chief Donnie Marshall, in one of his final official acts, was clearly troubled by the reports from some honest Colombian law enforcement agents who found that Moreno's GMP company leaked permanganate like a sieve, systematically violating the very safeguards that are meant to keep the precursors from the hands of narco-traffickers.
DEA chief Marshall reported:
"The Direccion Nacional de Estupefacientes (DNE) is the Colombia government agency that issues, revokes, and renews chemical permits for individuals or companies that handle controlled chemicals. The DNE also establishes the total quota of controlled chemicals to be imported per month by permit holders. A company may not import more than its quota in any given calendar month without the permission of the DNE.
"In general, a DNE permit is required if an individual or company wants to handle in excess of five kilograms or five liters of a controlled chemical per calendar month. Therefore, no permit is required if a person wishes to purchase less than five kilograms or five liters in a calendar month."
Regarding the shenanigans at Moreno's GMP to get around this rule, Marshall wrote:
"The Colombian National Police (CNP) is the enforcement entity of the DNE, and is authorized by the DNE to conduct investigations that could result in criminal or administrative penalties.
"On June 10, 1997, the CNP inspected one of GMP's facilities finding that on nine occasions between June 3, 1997 and June 6, 1997, GMP had failed to enter required information into its control logs concerning the sale of 2,450 kilograms of potassium permanganate.
(Again, kind reader, the math: that's enough precursor to make 24,000 kilos of cocaine, worth about $24 million dollars in the jungle, and $700 million dollars by the time the drug enters Los Angeles.)
DEA Chief Marshall continued:
"On December 15, 1997, the CNP inspected GMP and found record keeping discrepancies. GMP kept its control log tracking its sales and purchases of controlled chemicals on a computer. GMP was not authorized to maintain its records in this manner. GMP's general manager at that time testified that he was confused by this allegation by the CNP since GMP had been keeping computerized records since 1991. the CNP investigated the addresses and telephone numbers listed on GMP's seized invoices. This investigation revealed discrepancies including addresses that did not exist, telephone numbers that did not match the addresses listed on the invoices, and telephone numbers that did not exist.
"In addition, the CNP noted invoices issued on the same date to different named individuals listing the same address and telephone number. The invoices each reflected sales of 4.6 kilograms of potassium permanganate, below the threshold amount. The CNP discovered that the individuals listed on the invoices had not actually purchased the potassium permanganate, but their personal identification cards had been used by their employer to obtain the chemical.
"By letter dated January 22, 1998, CNP officials concluded that GMP, 'may be guilty of selling controlled chemical substances, for which purpose it is using fictitious addresses, names of actual persons and is making sales of controlled chemicals in amounts greater than those stipulated by the Office of the National Director of Narcotics without receiving a license from the D.N.E.'
"Evidence was represented at the hearing that GMP representatives also investigated the questioned invoices to determine the identity and location of the purchasers listed on the invoices. While GMP representatives were able to locate some of the individuals and companies named on the invoices, many remained unknown. Many contained fictions addresses, and in some instances, no addresses were provided on the invoices."
Uribe's campaign manager, Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, also spoke during the DEA administrative law hearings. According to DEA chief Marshall, "Mr. Moreno testified that he was unaware of any GMP controlled chemicals being diverted to the manufacture of cocaine or any other illicit drug."
To shed some perspective on the value of potassium permanganate, even before it is converted into cocaine, the South China News - covering the story from their end of the pipeline, where the permanganate is manufactured - noted on October 23, 1999 that the chemical fetched $75 per kilo in late 1997 (when the first and second of Moreno's GMP-bound shipments were seized) and that the price then skyrocketed to $280 US dollars per kilo by 1999.
Thus, the 50,000 seized kilos of Mr. Moreno's precursor substance were worth $3.7 million dollars when seized, but within two years grew to a black market value of $14 million dollars, before they might have even touched a single coca leaf.
The Hormiga Strategy
Controls Cocaine Market
A common expression in Spanish refers to "trabajo de hormigas," or "ant's work," and it applies to the manner used by Moreno's company to move large amounts of the cocaine precursor drug through small sales of volumes just under the five kilo threshold for which buyers must have a license.
As stated by the DEA: Much of GMP's permanganate went out the door in small volumes of only 4.6 kilos - enough to make 46 kilos of cocaine, valued at $30,000 a kilo in Miami, or $1.38 million dollars per "small" shipment - at a time.
The bottom line is this: coca grows on trees in Colombia, and most of the battles between military, paramilitary, police, rebels and the poor farmers - if anyone hopes to control the coca leaf market - will be waged in vain for decades to come.
But he who controls the potassium permanganate market in Colombia - a product that must be imported from continents far away - truly controls the global traffic of processed cocaine.
The same strict standards set by Moreno's GMP company will no doubt be applied when Mr. Moreno and Mr. Uribe - and their customers from the ranks of the narcos and paramilitary groups - get their mitts on the entire Colombian military and law enforcement complex, and the $2 billion US dollars of Plan Colombia.
The Back Story:
The House that Pablo Built
In 1982, when Uribe became mayor, his city of Medell?n, capital of Antioquia, was a boomtown. The Medell?n Cartel, with Pablo Escobar as its maximum leader, was taking the city by storm, constructing public housing for the poor, paying taxes, stoking Mayor Alvaro Uribe's construction of a world-class subway system. ("He must explain the much-debated Metro contract," pleaded columnist Antonio Caballero in a recent column in the national newsweekly Semana.)
The Liberal Party, through which Uribe and Escobar rose in the same electoral wave to mayoral and legislative power, is to Antioquia what the Democratic Party is to Boston: the entire political show.
But there were serious rifts in the party, then as now. One group, the New Liberalism movement, led by Luis Carlos Gal?n, was horrified by how organized crime had taken over the party and the City. As globally renowned Colombian author Gabriel Garc?a M?rquez wrote in his award-winning chronicle, The Autumn of a Drug Lord, about the life and death of Pablo Escobar:
"In 1982 Pablo Escobar had tried to find a place in the New Liberalism movement headed by Luis Carlos Gal?n, but Gal?n removed his name from the rolls and exposed him before a crowd of five thousand people in Medell?n."
As every law enforcer and scholar of narco-trafficking knows, not even Gal?n's courage could stop Escobar.
Pablo Escobar presided over the economic renaissance of Uribe's Medell?n. He built the houses, the people came, the people voted, and Pablo Escobar got himself elected to the national Congress.
In an oft neglected history by the journalists who write of Escobar's legend today, Congressman Escobar traveled to the United States in 1982, where this photo was taken, of Pablo and his son, in front of the Reagan-Bush White House, which would, soon, involve Escobar, with Panamanian President Manuel Noriega, and the Nicaraguan paramilitaries known as the Contras, in a cocaine-for-arms deal that coincided with the explosion of crack on the urban streets of North America.

The daily El Tiempo of Bogot? captioned that photo: "In 1982, as a member of Congress, Pablo Escobar traveled to the United States. In the photo he appears with his son Juan Pablo, in front of the White House."
As cultural critic Jason Manning, author of The Eighties Club, wrote:
"In 1981-82, an alliance between Pablo Escobar, Carlos Lehder, Jose Gacha and the Ochoa family resulted in the formation of the Medellin cartel, which ran most of the 50 cocaine labs in Colombia. In 1982 Escobar cut a deal with Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega, which allowed the cartel to ship cocaine through Panama for $100,000 a load. That same year, Escobar was elected to the Colombian congress; he bought votes by building low-income housing in the Medellin slums."
Or, as PBS Frontline reported in its Drug War timeline for that era:
1981-1982: Rise of the Medell?n Cartel. The alliance between the Ochoa family, Pablo Escobar, Carlos Lehder and Jose Gonzalo Rodriguez Gacha strengthens into what will become known as the "Medellin Cartel." The traffickers cooperate in the manufacturing, distribution and marketing of their cocaine.
And, in the PBS Frontline chronology:
March 1982: Pablo Escobar is elected to the Colombian Congress. Escobar cultivates an image of "Robin Hood" by building low-income housing, handing out money in Medellin slums and appearing throughout the city accompanied by Catholic priests. Escobar is elected an alternate representative from Envigado, but he's driven out of Congress in 1983 by Colombia's crusading Minister of Justice, Rodrigo Lara Bonilla.
Garc?a M?rquez, author of One Hundred Years of Solitude, Love in a Time of Cholera, and other classics, wrote that Escobar, now a Congressman, "had not forgotten the insult and unleashed an all-out war against the state, in particular against the New Liberalism. Rodrigo Lara Bonilla, who represented the New Liberalism as justice minister in the Belisario Betancur government, was murdered in a drive-by shooting on the streets of Bogot?. His successor, Enrique Parejo, was pursued all the way to Budapest by a hired assassin who shot him in the face with a pistol but did not kill him. On August 18, 1989, Luis Carlos Gal?n, who was protected by eighteen well-armed bodyguards, was machine-gunned on the main square in the municipality of Soacha, some ten kilometers from the presidential palace."
Colombian journalist Alfredo Molano, who Narco News interviewed in exile in Barcelona in July 2000, and whose predictions in that interview about what Plan Colombia would bring have resulted to be, unfortunately, all too accurate, wrote of Escobar, Medell?n, the violent prevention of the legalized Patriotic Union (UP) and M-19 parties from being able to participate in free and fair elections in 1990, and the assassination of Luis Carlos Gal?n, the last best hope for Colombia, in a September 2000 article for The NACLA Report.
Authentic journalist Alfredo Molano wrote:
"Meanwhile, the paramilitary forces had been growing dramatically, in many cases financed by the head of the Medellin Cartel, Pablo Escobar, especially around the northern region of the Magdalena Medio. With Escobar's financing and the army's tolerance, paramilitaries began decimating the leftist UP with impunity. It was during Barco's subsequent administration that most of the UP's activists were murdered. The final days of Barco's government were notably violent. Gunmen assassinated four presidential candidates Carlos Pizarro of the M-19 (who had just turned in their arms); Jaime Pardo Leal of the UP, followed closely by his replacement, Bernardo Jaramillo; and the Liberals' Luis Carlos Galan who would certainly have won the election."
The chief beneficiary of the assassination of that courageous man, Gal?n, "who would certainly have won the election," is a current backer of the coming Uribe-Moreno Precursor Narco-Ticket, as Alfredo Molano explained in his 2000 article:
"Galan was replaced by Cesar Gaviria, a party hack who had been Minister of Government, and who was elected president for the term 1990-1994."
C?sar Gaviria, today, is the US-imposed chief of the Organization of American States, backer of Plan Colombia, and mentor to key Uribe operative (albeit opportunistically) Rafael Pardo, who recently won the election as representative in the Senate of "Colombians Abroad." Gaviria presided over the big sellout of Colombia's sovereignty to a foreign power that now has Plan Colombia as its logical - but our guess is, futile - attempt to put the lid on democracy in Colombia through paramilitary terror.
Uribe and Moreno, together, were the key movers behind the paramilitary rise in Antioquia in the mid 1990s.
As Uribe's chief of staff, Moreno had many responsibilities: Among them, establishing heavily armed and government-trained vigilantes known as Rural Vigilance Committees (CONVIVIRs, as they were known, and came to be feared, across Uribe's province). These vigilante brigades served, according to Amnesty International and dozens of respected human rights organizations, as thinly-masked and government-sanctioned boot camps and recruiting agencies for Colombia's cocaine-soaked paramilitary forces.
The Archbishop
is Assassinated
Those violent policies came home to roost last week with the assassination, in Cali, Colombia, of Archbishop Isaias Duarte Cancino.
The Colombia Support Network said yesterday, in its statement remembering the fallen archbishop:
"Monsignor Duarte was a very fair and generous church leader. He was fundamentally important in helping CSN establish a sister community relationship with Apartado, where he was the Bishop before going on to be the Archbishop of Cali. His nobility of spirit and his commitment to peace were evident to all of us who had the privilege of meeting with him and working to establish links to promote social justice and peace in the region of Apartado. He was respectful and supportive of all who sought peace and justice, from the Patriotic Union administrators of the early 19901s through the mayoral administration of Gloria Cuartas, to the international presence which CSN and others brought to Apartado."
(The Archbishop's friends also report that hours before his assassination, a priest in his diocese called Colombian authorities to report suspicious individuals near the Archbishop and request more security for Father Duarte, and that the Colombian State did nothing.)
When, in 1997, Governor Uribe sent his CONVIVIR vigilante troops into the municipality of Apartado, the aforementioned Mayor Gloria Cuartas wrote the governor a letter on April 10, 1997, reporting on the disruption to the peace and tranquility of her town caused by the entrance of the CONVIVIR forces.
On behalf of Governor Uribe, his chief of staff, the GMP Chemical Products company owner Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, replied to Mayor Cuartas on government stationary, which provides a glimpse into the attitudes and values with which Uribe and Moreno governed Antioquia, and may soon govern all of Colombia:

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF GOVERNMENT
MEDELLIN, ANTIOQUIA
April 17, 1997
Madam GLORIA ISABEL CUARTAS MONTOYA
Mayor, Apartad?, Antioquia
Re: Your message of April 10, 1997, directed to the Governor of Antioquia
Distinguished Madam :
In relation to the mentioned message, allow me to demonstrate to you the following :
You fall into the same errors committed by distinguished directors of well-known associations in defense of human rights, which is to say :"They believe themselves to be professors of a subject with which they are not familiar and afterwards they ask for explanations".
Apart from this, your protagonistic eagerness leads you to spread your message to different sectors of society, to whom you send your incomplete and deformed view of the situation.
How much better it would be if before issuing your verdict you had taken the trouble to consult, analyze, engage in dialogue, and, once you had formed your conception, based upon a rational analysis of events, you had expressed your opinion upon the matter. Perhaps in this way your collaboration to achieve peace would be more effective.
For your information I attach the following :
1. A pamphlet illustrative of the Convivir Associations.
2. A letter of last March 20 sent to Mr. Vivanco of Human Rights Watch, in which you will find detailed information about all of the topics which trouble you.
The Commander of the Seventeenth Brigade, General Rito Alejo del Rio, will be able to provide you with details about their actions and other doubts which assail you on this topic.
Sincerely,
PEDRO JUAN MORENO VILLA
Secretary of Government
Attached : the mentioned documents
Copy : Dr. Alvaro Uribe Velez
Governor of Antioquia
Uribe's CONVIVIR project did turn, as Mayor Cuartas and many others had predicted, into a Frankenstein monster. The Uribe-backed brigades went on such a bloody rampage of massacres against unarmed civilians that they were banned, even in Colombia, by the end of 1997. Although Colombian courts ordered the return of the high-tech weaponry provided by the Colombian government to the Uribe-Moreno vigilantes, (weapons of the class reserved for exclusive use of the Colombian Armed Forces), few of the assault rifles made it back to the government.
Uribe's CONVIVIR vigilantes - exactly as the human rights organizations had warned - simply took their weapons and joined the ranks of Carlos Casta?o's narco-terrorist units of the so-called Self-Defense Forces of Columbia, or the AUC.
The U.S. State Department calls the AUC a "terrorist organization," even as it now backs its candidate, Uribe, for president of Colombia.
Business Week recently reported on the plans of candidate Alvaro Uribe V?lez to invoke this same paramilitary strategy on a national scale:
"Uribe Velez claims that if elected President, he will take a firmer line with the rebels. That's just what he did between 1995 and 1997 when he was governor of Antioquia, Colombia's second-largest province and onetime home to the infamous Medellin drug cartel. There, Uribe Velez promoted the creation of the controversial Convivirs. Styled as self-defense patrols, these armed militias supplied intelligence to the armed forces and helped police combat crime.
"It wasn't long before some of the local militias, which eventually numbered 67 in Antioquia and 400 nationwide, morphed into deadly paramilitary squads that targeted not only guerrillas but also suspected civilian sympathizers. That led the Colombian government to strip the Convivirs of most of their power in 1997."

Narco Family Values
The book, Los Jinetes de Coca?na (The Horsemen of Cocaine) by Fabio Castillo, published online by one of the most respected global human rights organizations, Nizkor, reported:
"Another native of Antioquia is Senator Alvaro Uribe V?lez - whose father, Alberto Uribe Sierra, was a known narco-trafficker - who, when he was director of the Civil Air agency (Alvaro Uribe) gave pilots licenses to many narcos.
"Uribe (the father) was arrested once in order to be extradited, but Jes?s Aristizabal Guevara, then government secretary for the City of Medell?n, succeeded in setting him free.
"The funeral of Uribe Sierra, assassinated near his plantation in Antioquia, was attended by then-president of the Republic Belisario Betancur, and a good part of the high society of Antioquia, amidst vocal protests from those who knew about his connections with cocaine."
The New Colombia News Agency (www.anncol.com), addressed this issue forthrightly on March 13th, when journalist Alfredo Castro stated:
"That Uribe's father was a well-known trafficker in the department of Antioquia before his death in 1983 is, on its own, not sufficient evidence to judge his son."
Uribe's Own Actions
Uribe's own actions as a bureaucrat and later mayor of the City of Medell?n, as the governor of the State of Antioquia - where his government secretary (chief of staff, in US terms) Pedro Juan Moreno Villa executed Uribe's paramilitary strategy with grave consequences for the unprotected public - and his campaign manager's simultaneous control over the cocaine precursor chemical industry that thus controls the cocaine industry, indicate what kind of government the US-backed Uribe will lead if successful in the May 26th presidential elections.
The polls indicate that, if the election were held today, Uribe would win, if only because so many other candidates and potential candidates have been assassinated, kidnapped or neutralized as a direct result of US policy to aggravate Colombia's Civil War.
The New Colombia News Agency reported on Uribe's record "as mayor of Medellin in the early 1980s when the city was known as 'The Sanctuary' due to the complete protection that the traffickers enjoyed from the city administration."
"At this time, Uribe was involved in at least two city projects in which Pablo Escobar himself was also deeply involved: One, the construction of a neighbourhood for poor people known as 'Medellin sin Tugurios' ('Medellin without Slums') and, the other, a civic program that aimed to plant thousands of trees in the city.
"Pablo Escobar financed both projects in an attempt to improve his public image and Uribe publicly supported both efforts. Indeed, Uribe even opened the new neighbourhood when it was completed despite the fact that most of the positive press coverage actually went to Escobar."
Another journalist to tackle the issues that the United States press, so far, fails to address, was El Espectador columnist Fernando Garavito, in a February column. New Colombia News Agency cites him, reporting:
"Garavito pointed out that during the time that Uribe was director of Colombia's Civil Aeronautics agency (1980-1982) numerous pilot licenses were handed over to the Medellin drug cartel - allowing their pilots to fly huge quantities of cocaine out of Colombia and towards or into the United States. Indeed Uribe was allegedly sacked as director for this misdemeanour."
"Thirdly," reports New Colombia News Agency, "was Uribe's performance as a senator between 1986 and 1994 when he consistently supported legislation that the drug cartels supported and consistently opposed that which they opposed. The best example of this, and the one the both Garavito and Castillo gave, was Uribe's vehement opposition to a plan before the Colombian Congress to hold a public referendum on whether or not to allow the courts to extradite drug traffickers to the United States - a plan that the cartels were violently opposed to and which Uribe, using his position as senator, did his best to sabotage.
Slow Boats from China
If Uribe wins the presidency, the documents on file in the DEA administrative law case against the company of Uribe's campaign manager, chief of staff, and right hand man, Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, will haunt his presidency from his first day in office.
"DEA would not suspend a shipment solely on the basis that no advance notice was filed," explained DEA chief Donnie Marshall in his August 3, 2001 report. "There would need to be evidence that the chemicals may be diverted to the clandestine manufacturer of a controlled substance."
"Accordingly," concluded the top drug enforcer in the United States in August of 2001, "the Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, pursuant to the authority vested in him by 21 U.S.C. 971 and 28 CFR 0.100(b), hereby orders that the suspensions of the above described shipments, be, and they hereby are, sustained, and that these proceedings are hereby concluded. This final order is effective immediately."
The docket number, for the inquiring reporters among our readers, of the DEA administrative law case, is:
FR Doc. 00-21482
The case file is open to inspection by the public and the press.
DEA chief Donnie Marshall's ruling is available online, at the U.S. Department of Justice website:
http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/fed_regs/notices/2000/fr08237.htm
The seized precursor chemicals - enough to manufacture one half-million kilos of cocaine, with a street value of $15 billion dollars - never made it to Moreno's warehouses in Medell?n.
But, according to the DEA, 200 metric tons were sold by Moreno's company at the very time that he was Governor Uribe's chief of staff in Antioquia.
Whether the Precursor Candidate, Alvaro Uribe, and his alchemist Pedro Juan Moreno Villa, make it to the Presidency remains to be seen. If so, all Am?rica - indeed the world - will see the US-backed Narco-State, caked in white powder, a government without credibility at ground zero of the war on drugs.
The narco-candidacy may be destined to win an election that is already neither fair nor free. But the narco-presidency that follows will be grounded at the docks from day one.
Perhaps that is Washington's intent. It would not be the first time that United States officials backed a presidential candidate in Latin America who, once elected, could be easily blackmailed and controlled due to his narco-history and documents on file in Washington DC: Pinochet, Noriega, Salinas, Zedillo, Menem, Banzer, Fujimori... and now, Alvaro Uribe.
There are ten weeks until the May 26, 2002 presidential vote in Colombia, as the permanganate hits the fan.
http://www.narconews.com/narcocandidate1.html


"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Josey1

No Problem With New FBI Surveillance Guidelines, Scholar Says

WASHINGTON--The Justice Department is expected to announce today new guidelines giving greater latitude to FBI agents to monitor Internet sites, libraries, and religious institutions without first having to offer evidence of potential criminal activity. Roger Pilon, vice president for legal affairs at the Cato Institute and a former Justice Department official, had the following remarks:

"As reported in the press, the new FBI surveillance guidelines present no serious problems. Especially under post-September 11 circumstances, law enforcement monitoring of public places is simply good, pro-active police work that violates the rights of no one. The same is true for topical research not directly related to a specific crime, which the new guidelines will permit.

"Depending on how the work is conducted, there is always the potential for abuse, of course. But unless the new latitude leads to significant abuse, that potential should not preclude officials from taking an active role not simply in prosecuting but in preventing crime as well."

http://www.cato.org/new/05-02/05-30-02r-2.html



"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Josey1

Posted on Sat, Jun. 01, 2002

National & International Digest




WISCONSIN


Former archbishop


apologizes for scandal


MILWAUKEE - Former Milwaukee Archbishop Rembert Weakland apologized Friday for the pain a $450,000 settlement the archdiocese reached with a man who accused him of sexual assault has caused the Catholic community.


"I apologize to all the faithful of the archdiocese, which I love so much, to all its people and clergy for the scandal that has occurred because of my sinfulness," Weakland said at a prayer service.


In 1998, the Milwaukee Archdiocese paid the settlement to Paul Marcoux, a former Marquette University theology student who accused Weakland of sexually assaulting him in 1979. Weakland has denied ever abusing anyone.


The money for the settlement came from the archdiocese's general budget, which includes income from sources such as investments and church-owned rental property, the archdiocese has said.


WASHINGTON, D.C.


Court strikes down ban


on Capitol protests


A federal appeals court Friday struck down a 30-year-old ban that keeps protesters from the House and Senate entrances of the Capitol, ruling that security concerns do not outweigh First Amendment rights at a building that is "a centerpiece of our democracy."


A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington unanimously agreed that U.S. Capitol Police regulations violate the right of protesters to gather on the sidewalk on the east side of the Capitol and pass out leaflets or hold signs.


The appeals court ordered a lower court to immediately enter an injunction barring enforcement of the ban. But it also said that police have the right to regulate and limit Capitol protests.


http://www.dfw.com/mld/startelegram/news/nation/3378824.htm



"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Josey1

'There Would Be No Place to Hide'
Unleashing the FBI



The [new] guidelines emphasize that the FBI must not be deprived of using all lawful authorized methods in investigations, consistent with the Constitution. -Attorney General John Ashcroft, New York Daily News, May 31
In reality, Mr. Ashcroft, in the name of fighting terrorism, [is] giving FBI agents nearly unbridled power to poke into the affairs of anyone in the United States, even where there is no evidence of illegal activity. -Lead editorial, New York Times, May 31

---

As usual, television-broadcast and cable-got it wrong. The thrust of what they call reporting on the reorganization of the FBI focused on the 900 or so new agents, the primacy of intelligence gathering over law enforcement, and the presence of CIA supervisors within the bosom of the FBI. (It used to be illegal for the CIA to spy on Americans within our borders.)

But the poisonous core of this reorganization is its return to the time of J. Edgar Hoover and COINTELPRO, the counter-intelligence operation-pervasively active from 1956 to 1971-that so disgraced the Bureau that it was forced to adopt new guidelines to prevent such wholesale subversion of the Bill of Rights ever again.

Under COINTELPRO, the FBI monitored, infiltrated, manipulated, and secretly fomented divisions within civil rights, anti-war, black, and other entirely lawful organizations who were using the First Amendment to disagree with government policies.

These uninhibited FBI abuses of the Bill of Rights were exposed by some journalists, but most effectively by the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations With Respect to Intelligence Activities. Its chairman, Frank Church of Idaho, was a true believer in the constitutional guarantees of individual liberties against the government-which is why we had a Revolution.

In 1975, Church told the nation, and J. Edgar Hoover, that COINTELPRO had been "a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association." And Church pledged: "The American people need to be reassured that never again will an agency of the government be permitted to conduct a secret war against those citizens it considers a threat to the established order."

Frank Church, however, could not have foreseen George W. Bush, John Ashcroft, FBI director Robert Mueller, and the cowardly leadership, Republican and Democratic, of Congress. (Notable exceptions are John Conyers of Michigan and Russell Feingold of Wisconsin.)

The guidelines for FBI investigations imposed after COINTELPRO ordered that agents could not troll for information in churches, libraries, or political meetings of Americans without some reasonable leads that someone, somehow, was doing or planning something illegal.

Without even a gesture of consultation with Congress, Ashcroft unilaterally has thrown away those guidelines.

From now on, covert FBI agents can mingle with unsuspecting Americans at churches, mosques, synagogues, meetings of environmentalists, the ACLU, the Gun Owners of America, and Reverend Al Sharpton's presidential campaign headquarters. (He has been resoundingly critical of the cutting back of the Bill of Rights.) These eavesdroppers do not need any evidence, not even a previous complaint, that anything illegal is going on, or is being contemplated.

Laura Murphy, the director of the ACLU's Washington office, puts the danger to us all plainly: "The FBI is now telling the American people, 'You no longer have to do anything unlawful in order to get that knock on the door.' "

During COINTELPRO, I got that knock on the door because I, among other journalists, had been publishing COINTELPRO reports that had been stolen from an FBI office. You might keep a pocket edition of the Constitution handy to present to the FBI agents-like a cross in front of Dracula.

The attorney general is repeatedly reassuring the American people that there's nothing to worry about. FBI agents, he says, can now go into any public place "under the same terms and conditions of any member of the public."

Really? While the rest of us do not expect privacy in a public place, we also do not expect to be spied upon and put into an FBI dossier because the organizers of the meeting are critical of the government, even of Ashcroft. We do not expect the casually dressed person next to us to be a secret agent of Ashcroft.

Former U.S. Attorney Zachary Carter, best known for his prosecution of the Abner Louima case, said in the May 31 New York Times that Ashcroft's discarding of the post-COINTELPRO guidelines means that now "law enforcement authorities could conduct investigations that [have] a chilling effect on entirely appropriate lawful expressions of political beliefs, the free exercise of religion, and the freedom of assembly."

So where are the cries of outrage from Democratic leaders Tom Daschle and Dick Gephardt? How do you tell them apart from the Republicans on civil liberties?

Back in 1975, Frank Church issued a warning that is far more pertinent now than it was then. He was speaking of how the government's intelligence capabilities-aimed at "potential" enemies, as well as disloyal Americans-could "at any time" be "turned around on the American people, and no American would have any privacy left-such is the capacity to monitor everything, telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter. There would be no place to hide . . .

"There would be no way to fight back," Church continued, "because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know."

Frank Church could not foresee the extraordinary expansion of electronic surveillance technology, the government's further invasion of the Internet under the new Ashcroft-Mueller guidelines, nor the Magic Lantern that can record every keystroke you make on your computer. But Church's pessimism notwithstanding, there is-and surely will be-resistance. And I'd appreciate hearing from resisters who are working to restore the Bill of Rights.


http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0223/hentoff2.php



"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Josey1

We're Losing Our Civil Liberties for Nothing
David Morris, AlterNet
May 30, 2002

The actual front page headline in the May 30 New York Times was "F.B.I. Chief Admits 9/11 Might Have Been Detectable." But it could just as easily have been "White House Confesses: We're Losing Our Civil Liberties Needlessly."


Last September, Attorney General John Ashcroft demanded that Congress give him unparalleled powers of surveillance and detention.


"Law enforcement tools created decades ago were crafted for rotary telephones, not e-mail, the Internet, mobile communications and voice mail," he told lawmakers. "I regret to inform you that we are today sending our troops into the modern field of battle with antique weapons."


A supine Congress gave him virtually everything he wanted.


Now we know that the FBI's "antique weapons" worked remarkably well, at least at the field level. In July 2001, Phoenix FBI Agent Ken Williams warned that Osama bin Laden might be sending operatives to American aviation schools to prepare for terrorist operations. He recommended that headquarters investigate all flight schools. The request was denied.


In Minneapolis Zacarias Moussaoui was arrested after the manager of a local flight school told FBI agents he appeared interested only in learning how to fly a large plane, not how to land it. The field office asked headquarters for permission to investigate Moussaoui further, including a request for a warrant to search his computer. The request was denied.


The problem wasn't a lack of surveillance and detention powers. The problem, as the Washington Post reports that FBI Director Robert Mueller has acknowledged "is the FBI's limited ability to gather and analyze intelligence".


That flaw should be fixed. But the strategy of this Administration since 9/11 has not been to remedy that weakness but instead to radically expand the invasive powers of government.


Both left and right are worried.


Brian Doherty writes in Reason Magazine, "Maybe Attorney General John Ashcroft isn't the greatest threat to individual liberty since the Inquisition. But that doesn't mean he hasn't been alarming so far." Laura Murphy, director of the ACLU's Washington office observes, "There is no proof that the incessant seizure of new powers by Congress and the Bush administration does anything to increase safety."


Most disturbingly, perhaps, is that we now know that Ashcroft read Agent Williams' memo a few days after Sept. 11. He knew then that the existing surveillance system, despite having to honor constitutional safeguards of due process and against secret detention, secret hearings and unlimited wiretapping, had generated information which, if acted on, may well have prevented the attacks.


Yet even with that knowledge, Ashcroft went to Congress and asked for drastically new invasive authority. And he famously warned those who worried about the loss of liberty that they were, in essence, traitors. "Those who scare peace-loving people with phantoms of lost liberty ... only aid terrorists."


Ashcroft's "phantoms of lost liberty" have become very, very real. Hundreds of people have been taken into custody. The government still refuses to reveal their names or the charges against them. Since December, at least 16 lawsuits have challenged the legitimacy of the Justice Department's actions. So far, five opinions have been issued, the most recent the day FBI Director Mueller made his public mea culpa. All conclude that the government is violating basic constitutional rights. The Department has appealed the first four adverse rulings and will undoubtedly appeal the most recent one as well.


On April 30, District Judge Shira Scheindlin ruled that the government had misused the material witness statute which allows the detention of material witnesses for trial, but not for grand jury investigations. The former federal prosecutor wrote "since 1789, no Congress has granted the government authority to imprison an innocent person in order to guarantee that he will testify before a grand jury conducting a criminal investigation."


In a press conference following the opinion release, Ashcroft termed the ruling "an anomaly." His Department is appealing.


In March, the Attorney General announced his intention to create 15,000 civilian "neighborhood watch" participants. These local watchdogs would look for suspicious activities in their community.


The same day FBI Director Mueller told the nation that his information gathering apparatus was working just fine before 9/11, the Attorney General announced he is lifting the limitations imposed on domestic spying by the FBI. Those limitations were imposed in the early 1970s after revelations of a terrifying abuse of power by FBI director J.Edgar Hoover against anti-war and civil rights activists.


At this point Congress -- and especially the Democratic Party -- are using the recent revelations to criticize the Bush Administration for what it did not do before 9/11. We would all be better off to use the new information to repair the damage done to this nation by both political parties after 9/11.


David Morris is Vice President of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance. http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=13255


"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Josey1

Louis Turner Comes out Swinging
By Louis Turner - Assistant Editor, The Federal Observer



In times of Old, many a wise man has searched for Truth. Billions have sacrificed their lives with wars, upon wars fighting to be free. Our world expands with a continuous belief of an old King. His name was Nimrod. This great King formed a one-world government in his time to the disobedience to God's command. Nimrod built a Tower, and formed a one-world government. Nimrod has come back to life again, and he has many adversaries.

And before I am through with this article, "Nimrod" will have more adversaries - You, and I!

The ancient Greeks built a wooden horse and the poor old Trojans couldn't overcome their curiosity. We should build a golden hammer, and see how many socialists we can force into the slammer.

Enough is enough! I have had it! Every time I read or hear someone say "democracy", I get a vision in my head that depicts bear liver in a plastic bag covered with vomitus blasphemy that spreads when someone opens the bag. We are a Republic folks. Do not believe the globalists when they say we are a democracy. For this is their CHIEF CORNER STONE to all the smoke and mirrors you are experiencing today. This is their tool for the destruction of this Great Country!

"There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." - Proverbs 14:12 (KJV)

"For in a Republic, the power of government is limited by law; in a democracy, the power of government is without limits - it expands to meet the never ending desires of the screaming mobs and serves it's puffed up ideas to The small ruling elite to the destruction of any Country! The United States is a Republic-not a mob ruled democracy!"

Who opened the bag? Just listen to the media! Listen to George Bush! Have you noticed lately how many times you have heard that awful word claimed in the name of Victory? How about Past Presidents? Did they use that awful word too? How about you? Do you feel like a puppet on a string?

The socialists are making an open JOKE out of our GREAT Country, and here we are - sitting back and letting it happen while liberals are giving us their version of getting criminals off the streets by Staring at them through the tines of a fork and pretending that they are in jail! WOULD IT BE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL TO USE A SKUNK TO EXTRACT A BARRICADED SUSPECT? Wow, man the wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead.

Look at the idiocy that is going on. Our Government refuses to arm pilots! Our Government wants to teach our children to be GAY! Our Government wants us disarmed! Our Government wants the masses to worship the Almighty United Nations! Our Government wants to STEAL our land and National Monuments, and give it all over to the U.N. along with our sovereignty! Our Government is pulling us into the PITS OF HELL! WAKE UP!

The socialists in the media, and our government are counting on you to soak it all in because you have been brain washed since the ole school days. Both Parties are guilty of HIGH TREASON! Can you hear it? Can you hear a GREAT GOLDEN HAMMER slamming the socialists back to where they came from? That Great Golden Hammer is a judge's gavel. GUILTY!

Notice the new form of Polling? It is done by majority rule! If child molesters are the dominant voters, then child molesters will RULE! Democracy never lasts long. Notice what has happened in history. Those Countries fell into Anarchy. Looting, burning, mobs, etc. Are you getting the picture of the L.A. riots in mind here? And they tell us "Communism is dead." LIARS!

Oh! And here is the quote of the day - "If this were a dictatorship, it'd be a heck of a lot easier, just so long as I'm the dictator." - President G. W. Bush

How about the recent news on arming pilots? The headline news should have quoted something like this:

"When terror raised its ugly head,
Congress turned its tail and fled.
With a Globalist One world government view,
you the sheeple, they would screw!"

Having the government force us, as private citizens, to fly disarmed, and to accept their decision to fight terrorism by disarming pilots, is like having an airline pilot tell his passengers that the plane is going too fast and suggesting that the passengers all stick their heads out of the windows and blow! You get "scumbag Willy" out of the White-house, and before you know it - IN COMES A BURNING BUSH WITH THE ATTRIBUTES OF A CHAMELEON! TO HELL WITH THIS!
He took an Oath to uphold The Constitution. Lets Impeach this man and make an open example of him for all to see! Then, lets go after Hillary and throw her, and her cronies OUT of this Country! HELL, lets impeach, and banish all of them. Lets Stand on their toes, grab them by the lapels, and scream up their nostrils!

In my mind just yesterday, I saw a Village full of handguns kill a Congress full of people! But, yet, here is another way we can truly save America: "Take away the wicked from before the King, and his throne shall be established in righteousness." Proverbs 25:5 (KJV). Lets get out of the United Nations! Lets do away with the Council on Foreign Relations! Lets clean out the whole circle of power that the socialists occupy, and replace them with lovers of God and the Constitution! Then George Bush's presidency will be established in righteousness!

Just a thought...Is it illegal to auction off people? If not, I have some Californians to put on eBay, along with one goofy Arizona senator who doesn't realize he isn't a Californian! This senator is depriving a village somewhere of an idiot! Keep this in mind folks:
"Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience..." - John Locke 1690 2nd Treatise on Government Chapter 19 paragraph 222

This is WAR, but from Within!

http://www.federalobserver.com/archive.php?aid=2709


"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878