In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
Options

Support For Armed Pilots Remains High?Opposition W

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited July 2002 in General Discussion
Support For Armed Pilots Remains High-Opposition Waning
Support for legislation that would establish a program to arm pilots continues to gather momentum. A little over two weeks ago, the House passed by nearly a 3-to-1 margin its bill, H.R. 4635, which would establish an armed pilots program. Last week's resignation of Undersecretary of Transportation for Security John Magaw-the head of the Transportation Security Administration(TSA), who was publicly opposed to the idea of training pilots how to safely handle a firearm on the flight deck-removed one of the bureaucratic obstacles to passage of this critical legislation. And this week, the U.S. Senate finally began discussing its armed pilots legislation, S. 2554, and Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta'sprevious opposition to the proposal seems to be waning.

On Tuesday, Secretary Mineta told the Aviation Subcommittee of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure that he had instructed Magaw's replacement at TSA, Admiral James M. Loy, to examine the possibility of arming commercial airline pilots. And on Thursday, the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation held a hearing on aviation security where the only real vocal opposition to arming pilots expressed by a lawmaker came from U.S. Senator Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.), who chairs the committee.

Hollings's opposition to armed pilots is so extreme that he rejected a request to testify before Congress from the widow of a pilot who was killed in the September 11 terrorist attacks. Ellen Saracini, whose husband was killed when the plane he piloted, United Airlines Flight 175, was hijacked by terrorists and crashed into the World Trade Center, was on The O'Reilly Factor Wednesday night. She told Bill O'Reilly that Senator Hollings would not let her testify before his committee. After O'Reilly asked if she had contacted Hollings directly, she stated, "I have a letter right here that was addressed to the senator. [U.S.] Senator Bob Smith (R-N.H.) wrote a letter, asking that I be able to testify and it was denied." When NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre heard from Ellen Saracini, and she told him of her not being allowed to testify, LaPierre sent a letter to Senator Hollings asking, "On behalf of our over 4 million members and the tens of millions of Americans who believe in pilots being given a practical and effective tool to defend the cockpit from terrorist attacks, I am appealing to you to give Ellen Saracini the opportunity to testify."

Fortunately, few lawmakers are willing to openly join Hollings in his opposition to S. 2554, while supporters of the bill continue to make themselves known. The bill now has 24 co-sponsors, and U.S. Senator Gordon Smith (R-Ore.) announced he supports the bill after having spoken to two pilots recently when weather delayed his flight out of Chicago's O'Hare International Airport. Quick action in the Senate on S. 2554 remains critical, so now is the time to contact your U.S. Senators and urge them to support this legislation. Please contact your U.S. Senators at (202) 224-3121 and urge them to cosponsor S. 2554, work to ensure the bill is brought up for consideration, or support its being offered as an amendment to other legislation being considered on the Senate floor. You can find additional contact information by using our "Write Your Representatives" tool.

http://www.nraila.org/LegislativeUpdate.asp?FormMode=Detail&ID=440

"If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878

Comments

  • Options
    Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Mon 29 Jul 2002



    printer friendly email article
    Pilots' fury as ground workers allowed to carry knives

    ALASTAIR JAMIESON
    ajamieson@scotsman.com


    AIRLINE pilots are to complain to the government over a relaxation of rules which means Sikh workers can wear ceremonial daggers despite tighter rules since 11 September.

    Flight crew have expressed anger after ministers announced ground staff who work at Heathrow can wear their kirpans - small religious swords with three inch blades.

    But the rules have not been changed for pilots and cabin crews, who are still subject to the same strict security requirements as passengers. Pilots have to check items such as penknives, nail scissors and pins into the aircraft hold along with baggage from passengers.

    One Glasgow-based pilot, who flies to UK destinations including Heathrow, said: "This is making people angry because it places political correctness above common sense.

    "We can't bring little things such as penknives or tweezers into the cockpit, even inside bags, unless we can prove they are required for the job. Now ground staff wearing daggers can get access to aircraft anyway. It is illogical."

    Orthodox Sikhs must have the kirpan - one of the so-called "5Ks" - on them at all times, even in the bath or bed, but the kirpan was banned in secure, airside, areas after 11 September.

    The 5Ks are five items which all begin with a K in Punjabi. They are a piece of uncut hair, a wooden comb kept in the hair, a bracelet, a pair of knee-length shorts and the kirpan. The airport rules say the small knife can now be worn as long as it is discreet, cannot be snatched and the blade is less than one inch in length.

    The Department of Transport ruled Sikh airport workers could carry their kirpans again after local politicians took up their case with the minister John Spellar.

    A spokesman for The British Airline Pilots' Association, (BALPA) said: "We respect the tradition and the religious requirements of the Sikh community but we cannot accept a situation where objects such as the kirpan can be allowed in areas where flight crew cannot carry similar items for their business.

    "It is theoretically possible that a hijacker or terrorist could grab these items and use them, and we will be making representations to the government about this."

    Airlines and passenger groups have also expressed concerns about the tightened security arrangements, which have increased check-in times at airports and forced business travellers who normally only carry hand luggage to check their bags into the hold, adding to journey times.

    A BAA Heathrow spokesman said: "New guidance has been issued to all security staff noting the change in policy.

    "The policy has not changed for anyone else, and we ask all people to abide by the security requirements in order to help keep the disruption caused by security checks to a minimum."

    A Department for Transport spokesman said: "The kirpan can be worn as long as the blade is less than three inches in length, worn discreetly under clothing and can't be snatched.

    "The rules apply only to Sikh staff working at airports - not Sikh staff travelling or the public."

    The rules do not allow staff to carry a sgian dubh as part of Highland dress because it is not for religious reasons.

    Sikhs are the largest ethnic minority at Heathrow, where 86 work in cleaning, catering and customs. Sikh labourers from the Punjab built Terminal 1 in the 1950s.

    Every day, security staff at BAA's seven airports in the UK confiscate around 15,000 sharp items which are no longer permitted in hand luggage, including between 1,000 and 2,000 sharp items which are taken at Heathrow alone.

    Over 2.5 million sharp items have been confiscated since the 11 September terrorist attacks on the United States.

    The long list of items which can no longer be carried on aircraft under tough new rules include: toy or replica guns (metal or plastic); catapults; household cutlery, including knives with blades of any length; razor blades; tools; darts; scissors; hypodermic needles (unless required for medical reasons); knitting needles; sporting bats, billiard, snooker or pool cues.

    http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/uk.cfm?id=816262002


    "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of a constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
Sign In or Register to comment.