In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Campaign Finance Reform=GUN CONTROL

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited March 2002 in General Discussion
Incumbent Protection Bill Nearing Showdown-- Time to send another volley towards Capitol Hill Gun Owners of America8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102Springfield, VA 22151 (703)321-8585 "Campaign finance reform is long overdue," said Michael D. Barnes, President of the Brady Campaign and a former Congressman from Maryland. "The passage of Shays-Meehan is a victory for democracy.... Perhaps now, the gun lobby's stranglehold on Congress will be broken." -- U.S. Newswire, February 14, 2002 (Thursday, March 14, 2002) -- Look who's supporting the Incumbent Protection Bill these days. Sarah Brady's organization, formerly known as Handgun Control, Inc., recently hailed the passage of the anti-gun bill in the House. Michael Barnes, the president of the Brady Campaign, basically admitted that his group can't compete with pro-Second Amendment organizations. So he wants to "level the playing field" by silencing the voice of his opponents. "Even though [Shays-Meehan] will impact our election activities as well," Barnes says, the bill will reduce even more "the gun lobby's ability to obstruct the progress of sensible gun laws. Shays-Meehan will level the playing field so that our lawmakers are no longer beholden to special interest groups like the NRA." Of course, it's not a level playing field that Barnes is after. Anti-gun groups like the Brady Campaign get more free publicity from the media than they could ever afford to buy. So Barnes knows good and well that by squelching the First Amendment freedoms of pro-gun organizations, his group will have a great advantage. This is not a surprising attitude from a man who makes his living trying to restrict other freedoms -- such as the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms -- guaranteed in the Bill of Rights. Barnes' attitude is somewhat reminiscent of the ole' Federalists, who passed the Sedition Act of 1798 as a means of punishing their opponents who were critical of the John Adams administration. Instead of giving the Federalists an advantage, however, the law enraged people so much that they went to the polls and defeated members of that party in the election of 1800. The act was one of the main things that drove the Federalist Party into extinction. Ignoring the lessons of history, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-SD) is committed to passing the bill that will muzzle the First Amendment rights of groups like Gun Owners of America. As a result, the Senate could begin voting on the Shays-Meehan bill by this Friday (tomorrow). That's why it is so important that you contact your Senators right now. More than likely, you have already contacted them. Please contact them again. Urge your friends and family to contact their Senators as well. CONTACT INFORMATION: You can call your Senators at 202-224-3121 or toll-free at 1-877-762-8762. To identify your Senators, as well as to send a message via e-mail, see the Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm on the GOA website.
Pre-written message
Dear Senator: I hope you will take a strong stand against the Incumbent Protection Bill, and will vote AGAINST any attempt to invoke cloture should the bill be filibustered. This legislation -- erroneously known as campaign finance reform -- would squelch the voice of organizations that I support. In 1798, Congress passed the Sedition Act in an effort to punish those who criticized elected officials. President John Adams, a Federalist, signed the bill into law. Because of the Federalist Party's support for the onerous law, John Adams and many other members of his party were defeated in the next election. In the end, it proved to be the death-knell for the Federalist Party. I can't predict what will happen to those who vote for the Incumbent Protection Bill -- or those who show their support by opposing the filibuster. But I do know that the Incumbent Protection Bill is NO DIFFERENT, in principle, from the Sedition Act that was passed more than 200 years ago. This bill is simply an attempt by legislators to punish those who criticize elected officials. Again, I urge you to vote AGAINST invoking cloture and vote AGAINST final passage. This bill is anti-free speech. Please let me know how you intend to vote. Sincerely, ****************************Fight for freedom every time you make a long distance phone call! GOA has partnered with Promise Vision, one of America's major long distance telephone providers. Every long distance call made by a GOA customer of Promise Vision results in a 15% payment to GOA. Unlike with ATT, Sprint or MCI, patrons of Promise Vision have none of their moneys filtered to anti-gun candidates. Promise Vision offers different rate plans, depending on one's long distance volume. One plan offers 7 cents a minute with a small monthly service charge. You can help yourself and help GOA by using Promise Vision. See http://www.gunowners.org/pvld.htm for more details and to sign up. Or call the special GOA toll-free number at Promise Vision; that number is 1-866-458-9111. http://www.gunowners.org/a031402.htm

Comments

  • Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Dark side of campaign "reform"FPPC v CAC, Russ Howard & Steve CiceroMarch 13, 2002Californians Against Corruption - Defense Fund1500 Voorhees Avenue, Manhattan Beach, California 90266 www.CACDefenseFund.org, CAC@CACDefenseFund.org From:Russ HowardUpdate: Dark side of campaign "reform"; FPPC v CAC, Russ Howard & Steve CiceroTo: Constitutional Rights SupportersAs you may know, California's political establishment is still seeking retribution on Steve Cicero and myself for ousting their chief anti-self-defense architects: Former Senate President David Roberti & former Assembly Speaker ProTem Mike Roos. Our relentless campaigns were so effective that neither has since been elected to office, and our "pain" message dried up the state gun control torrent for several years. After losing his Senate Presidency and a bid for State Treasurer, Roberti cashed in IOUs to get appointed to the Disability Appeals Board and later the Solid Waste Board. "David of Hollywood" fell from his pinnacle of power into a cushy job helping leeches cash in on the corrupt welfare state he worked to build. Then he oozed on to "Sultan of Sludge". Fitting for a limo-leftist who helped turn California into a sociological toxic waste dump.Still, after all these years, Roberti thought his sleaze was a distant enough memory to get away with lowering his sights to a run for L.A. City Council. So, of course, we sent our opposition research to the other candidates, though it was already public from our campaigns and Roberti's Treasury race (we gave it to his opponent for statewide ads). Sure enough, he lost the primary. So former Senate President Roberti can't even make it to a runoff for City Council. All he needs now is to lose a race for Dog Catcher. Pathetic.You see why the establishment wants its own retribution. If grassroots activists can doom California's 2nd most powerful politician, then less-powerful pols are highly vulnerable. Exacting revenge on us discourages such campaigns.At Roberti's urging, the FPPC - California's speech police - gave us the largest campaign disclosure fine ever issued, on exaggerated charges we never got to refute. Our offense was refusing to identify our donors for harassment by Roberti and his corrupt buddies, at a time when we ourselves were subjected to death threats and break-ins. Over $1.1 million with interest, the fine violates due process; the ban on excessive fines; the right to jury trial; the presumption of innocence; and freedom of expression, assembly & petition. If it's not overturned, it'll hound us forever and deter other campaigns.It should be easy to overturn. We were denied justice at the trial court level due to corruption and a complex administrative law system that, intentionally or not, works only for the privileged. For example, our cross complaint was dismissed by Judge Connelly after he failed to disclose massive conflicts of interest.Connelly turned out to be former Assemblyman Lloyd Connelly, one of California's top three gun grabbers until his 1992 retirement. Not only was he on our list of corrupt politicos to oust, he took money from Roberti & Roos, donated to them, and co-authored bills with them, and his firm was Roberti's campaign counsel. When we appealed Connolly's unethical acts, a fellow judge covered for him, ruling there was no conflict. Then another trial judge granted a motion for summary judgment that denied us a trial, so our defenses were never heard or considered even by a judge, let alone a jury. To add insult to this injury, the editor of the Sacramento News & Review hijacked what would've been a fair article about our case and warped it into an FPPC puff piece that the investigative journalist who wrote the original article barely recognized. The editor let Sacramento political attorney Lance Olson respond to my comments without reciprocity, so Olson was able to trash us without disclosing his former law practice with Connelly. A year after the editor declined my response, I discovered on a chance internet search that he'd published Roberti's response and never told me.Prior to campaign finance "reform", one could anonymously donate to opponents of powerful incumbents without fear of retribution. Campaign finance "reform" enabled incumbents to use forced disclosure as a tool to identify & suppress opposition and shake down donations. Not surprisingly, the political elite benefits from double standards: Multi-millionaires like Diane Feinstein get wrist slaps for laundering millions while grassroots volunteers get draconian fines for shielding privacy & 1st Amendment rights (see article by Brian Doherty - http://reason.com/hod/bd043001.shtml. Note: The "conservative" media have ignored the case even during periods when campaign finance reform was hot).We're appealing, and we have reason to hope for fairer treatment, partly due the enormity of the injustice. If we get a fair hearing, we should prevail. That would be good news for grassroots activism, CAC, and me, but especially for Steve Cicero and his family, who were purely innocent bystanders - intentional collateral damage inflicted by the FPPC.Luckily, we were able to retain Bruce Adelstein of AppelateLaw.com, a highly competent constitutionalist who likes the case and took it for a very reasonable fee (his initial brief can be seen on www.CACDefenseFund.org in the public documents link). Thanks to donors like Gun Owners of America, KeepAndBearArms.com, Rick Carone, Arnold Gaunt, "Doc Halliday", Weldon Clark, and many others, we funded most of the appeal.But we're still short $5,000; more if we have to appeal to a higher court. We hate asking for donations, but there's no choice. A donation through Gun Owners Foundation is 100% tax-deductible. If you don't need deductions, regular donations can be made out to the CAC Defense Fund. If you donate to GOF, please write "CAC Defense Fund" in the check memo. Donations can also be made on-line at: www.gunowners.com/ldfhoward.htm and www.cacdefensefund.org. Feel free to email goamail@gunowners.org or cac@cacdefensefund.org with questions or feedback. Thanks for your generosity and patriotism in this case, and in general.For Liberty and Justice,Russ Howard http://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNewsPlus.asp?cmd=view&articleid=2313
Sign In or Register to comment.