In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Cops force soldiers to lick urine off ground

Comments

  • joshmb1982joshmb1982 Member Posts: 8,228 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    WTH??? lick some mud from a dark ally or get a citation. hmm let me think all take the citation and see you in court. i know the vets are supposedt to follow orders but come on.
  • txlawdogtxlawdog Member Posts: 10,039 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Horrible, I have never heard of such disrespect, very sad.
  • mousemouse Member Posts: 3,624
    edited November -1
    I hope they get a nice bit of money for the disgrace of having
    a couple meat heads use a power trip.
  • dongizmodongizmo Member Posts: 14,477 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    19 & 20 YO LEO's? their lucky the NG's didn't beat the snot of them....
    Don
    The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly, is to fill the world with fools.
  • bigcitybillbigcitybill Member Posts: 4,912 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    That's just plain SICK.
  • M1GarandloverM1Garandlover Member Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Now thats BS and it stinks. Rookie cops on a powertrip
  • peonpeon Member Posts: 2,644 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I'm not so sure on this one. Who would actually lick an unknown liquid off of the ground? I'd tell them to write me a citation, then fight it. The story wreaks of BS.
  • GuvamintCheeseGuvamintCheese Member Posts: 38,932
    edited November -1
    Who do you believe?
  • DBMJR1DBMJR1 Member Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by cartod
    Who do you believe?

    Well since one of the LEO's was fired, and the other reprimanded, I'll go with the Chief LEO's opinion that the young cops were guilty.

    I think these two soldiers will handily win their suit.
  • River RatRiver Rat Member Posts: 9,022
    edited November -1
    Emotionally, I support their statement. But I have a gut feeling this is BS. I'd think ANYONE would say "okay, so give me a ticket."
  • RugerNinerRugerNiner Member Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    And Cops don't understand why people don't respect them or the badge.
    Keep your Powder dry and your Musket well oiled.
    NRA Lifetime Benefactor Member.
  • chappsynychappsyny Member Posts: 3,381 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    The two GI's would have been justified in using force against the out of control cops. They should have kicked thier *.
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.
  • peonpeon Member Posts: 2,644 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.


    +1
  • MVPMVP Member Posts: 23,453 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by chappsyny
    The two GI's would have been justified in using force against the out of control cops. They should have kicked thier *.

    It should of ended with the Soldiers making those punks behind a badge lick blood off the ground while it was dripping from their face.
  • AlpineAlpine Member Posts: 15,092 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.


    I greatly pains me to say, but I agree with you 100%.
    ?The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.?
    Margaret Thatcher

    "There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
    Mark Twain
  • AnonymouseAnonymouse Member Posts: 4,050
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by MVP
    quote:Originally posted by chappsyny
    The two GI's would have been justified in using force against the out of control cops. They should have kicked thier *.

    It should of ended with the Soldiers making those punks behind a badge lick blood off the ground while it was dripping from their face.


    More brave internet talk. Then the two soldiers would have been charged with felony assault on police officers, if not just shot right there, and the cops' original actions would have been covered up and the two soldiers land in jail or dead. I do agree they should not have complied and just taken the citations and fought it in court. But, seeing as how one cop was fired and the other reprimanded, the story rings true.
  • chappsynychappsyny Member Posts: 3,381 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by P228
    quote:Originally posted by MVP
    quote:Originally posted by chappsyny
    The two GI's would have been justified in using force against the out of control cops. They should have kicked thier *.

    It should of ended with the Soldiers making those punks behind a badge lick blood off the ground while it was dripping from their face.


    More brave internet talk. Then the two soldiers would have been charged with felony assault on police officers, if not just shot right there, and the cops' original actions would have been covered up and the two soldiers land in jail or dead. I do agree they should not have complied and just taken the citations and fought it in court. But, seeing as how one cop was fired and the other reprimanded, the story rings true.

    Cops acting outside the color of law are not protected by it. You are presuming that these two GI's weren't equally or better matched then the two cops. It could have easilly wound up with two unconcous cops and the two GI's beat it out of there.
  • AnonymouseAnonymouse Member Posts: 4,050
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.


    Ahh, So what would you tell a citizen to do, when punk cops try to force them to obey a dumb police order and who then threaten to make up a charge of burglary? Fight the cops and then end up arrested for felony assault on a police officer, or end up dead and the cops can then make up any story they want to cover their original actions? The cops are the pathetic ones. All three cops should have been arrested and should be in jail. I hope the soldiers sue all three and the dept into poverty.
  • remingtonoaksremingtonoaks Member Posts: 26,245 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by DBMJR1
    Originally posted by cartod
    Who do you believe?

    Well since one of the LEO's was fired, and the other reprimanded, I'll go with the Chief LEO's opinion that the young cops were guilty.

    I think these two soldiers will handily win their suit.


    [/quote

    I agree, The chief may have suspended with pay until the investigation was over..But he wouldn't fire or suspend without pay, unless there is proof...The LEOs could sue also if proof wasn't present... Cops probably bragged to all their buds..other wise I don't know where the proof would have come from...

    I know I wouldn't of licked it up...Even if they threatened my life...But then I know that there is a better place than this waiting for me when I pass on...And Public urination is not a felony or too expensive of a fine. And as far as the burglary charges goes... I know the cops would have to produce proof. I damn sure wouldn't touch anything they tried to get me to touch....

    A Lot could happen to these LEOs after every thing settles down...I would hate to be on the receiving side of revenge from a punch of soldiers that saw more crap in 1 day of battle that most will ever see in their life's, Sure changes a guy's perspective...Wrong people to screw with...JMO
  • Night StalkerNight Stalker Member Posts: 11,967
    edited November -1
    I honestly could care less that the kids were soldiers/veterans.

    What matters most is they ARE citizens of this great Nation and NO citizen should be treated in this manner.

    WTH is wrong with these LEO's? Had they been watching the movie Super Bad before going on duty?

    NS
  • Da-TankDa-Tank Member Posts: 3,718 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ever have your co. tell the company" get into trouble while stationed here and I'll hang you out to dry" First Sgt. nhen says keep it clean boys.
    Go to a faraway training and start trouble. Your in Wi. from Tn. and training is over in 1 mo. court is in 3 mos. lasts 1 eeek all out of your pocket.Lose job for to much time off.

    *ELL do what your told then come back with lawyers. "Revenge is sweet"
  • ForkliftkingForkliftking Member Posts: 4,907 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dongizmo
    19 & 20 YO LEO's? their lucky the NG's didn't beat the snot of them....
    Don

    You have to remember they were NG's. When I was in the Army, we called them "Nasty Girls".[:D][:D]
  • dongizmodongizmo Member Posts: 14,477 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by forkliftking
    quote:Originally posted by dongizmo
    19 & 20 YO LEO's? their lucky the NG's didn't beat the snot of them....
    Don

    You have to remember they were NG's. When I was in the Army, we called them "Nasty Girls".[:D][:D]

    We did too, but it's not the same game anymore.
    Don
    The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly, is to fill the world with fools.
  • 11BravoCrunchie11BravoCrunchie Member Posts: 33,423 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by dongizmo
    19 & 20 YO LEO's? their lucky the NG's didn't beat the snot of them....
    Don



    The reason why the soldiers DIDN'T is because they have a sense of honor and discipline. If I were in the same situation, I would have taken the ticket and then contested it in court. That would've looked worse for the "cops." Those "cops" deserve to burn....literally. No one should EVER be allowed to treat Veterans that way.
  • AnonymouseAnonymouse Member Posts: 4,050
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by chappsyny
    quote:Originally posted by P228
    quote:Originally posted by MVP
    quote:Originally posted by chappsyny
    The two GI's would have been justified in using force against the out of control cops. They should have kicked thier *.

    It should of ended with the Soldiers making those punks behind a badge lick blood off the ground while it was dripping from their face.


    More brave internet talk. Then the two soldiers would have been charged with felony assault on police officers, if not just shot right there, and the cops' original actions would have been covered up and the two soldiers land in jail or dead. I do agree they should not have complied and just taken the citations and fought it in court. But, seeing as how one cop was fired and the other reprimanded, the story rings true.

    Cops acting outside the color of law are not protected by it. You are presuming that these two GI's weren't equally or better matched then the two cops. It could have easilly wound up with two unconcous cops and the two GI's beat it out of there.


    Very true, but try to prove it when the call goes out of two cops down and every cop in the county shows up looking to shoot the guys who put the two cops down. Real easy to wind up dead, with no way to prove you were in the right all along. And cops have a real nasty habit of wrongly shooting people and getting away with it. (NYPD in particular is good at it.)
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by P228
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.


    Ahh, So what would you tell a citizen to do, when punk cops try to force them to obey a dumb police order and who then threaten to make up a charge of burglary? Fight the cops and then end up arrested for felony assault on a police officer, or end up dead and the cops can then make up any story they want to cover their original actions? The cops are the pathetic ones. All three cops should have been arrested and should be in jail. I hope the soldiers sue all three and the dept into poverty.


    What the hell is your point?

    There is no duty, or need, to obey a cop just because the cop says to do something, which happens to be blatantly unlawful.

    Here is a concept, flatly refuse to comply with the stupid order and let Officers Spanky, Skippy and Stupid do what they think they need to do and make them live with the consequences.

    Did they not teach you in the Academy that your authority is based on law? In this case, there was nothing lawful about the order, instruction, or bullying tactic, period.

    Neither did you see me state that the "soldiers" should attack the cops. I simply said:

    "While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic."

    That reads pretty simply, don't you think?

    Good Lord!
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Alpine
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.


    I greatly pains me to say, but I agree with you 100%.


    It pains me greatly to have you say it also, but it is what it is.[:o)]
  • n/an/a Member Posts: 168,427
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by Night Stalker
    I honestly could care less that the kids were soldiers/veterans.

    What matters most is they ARE citizens of this great Nation and NO citizen should be treated in this manner.

    WTH is wrong with these LEO's? Had they been watching the movie Super Bad before going on duty?

    NS


    Nope, it is a sign of the "new breed" of "LEO", rather than someone with a "peace officer" outlook.

    One is focused on "reasonable and just" keeping of the peace, enforcing laws only as necessary to meet that mission. The other is all about an enforce it if it is "the law" mentality, coupled with a growing sense of entitlement.

    There is a distinct difference.
  • ElMuertoMonkeyElMuertoMonkey Member Posts: 12,898
    edited November -1
    Sounds to me like some of those techniques that were "nothing but frat house pranks" have come home to roost.

    Everyone who turned a blind eye to that BS earlier was a fool to think it wouldn't eventually do so.
  • nunnnunn Forums Admins, Member, Moderator Posts: 36,085 ******
    edited November -1
    Looks like there are morons in the police service and in the National Guard.

    Write me up, Skippy, and I'll see you in court. I ain't licking the ground.
  • AnonymouseAnonymouse Member Posts: 4,050
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    quote:Originally posted by P228
    quote:Originally posted by lt496
    While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic.


    Ahh, So what would you tell a citizen to do, when punk cops try to force them to obey a dumb police order and who then threaten to make up a charge of burglary? Fight the cops and then end up arrested for felony assault on a police officer, or end up dead and the cops can then make up any story they want to cover their original actions? The cops are the pathetic ones. All three cops should have been arrested and should be in jail. I hope the soldiers sue all three and the dept into poverty.


    What the hell is your point?

    There is no duty, or need, to obey a cop just because the cop says to do something, which happens to be blatantly unlawful.

    Here is a concept, flatly refuse to comply with the stupid order and let Officers Spanky, Skippy and Stupid do what they think they need to do and make them live with the consequences.

    Did they not teach you in the Academy that your authority is based on law? In this case, there was nothing lawful about the order, instruction, or bullying tactic, period.

    Neither did you see me state that the "soldiers" should attack the cops. I simply said:

    "While the officers reported actions are reprehensible, the fact that these two 'soldiers' actually complied with such a ridiculous directive/threat removes every bit of sympathy for them from the equation.

    If true, fire/charge the officers, but anyone who would comply with such a "police order" is an idiot of the highest order and is worthy of contempt IMO.

    Pathetic."

    That reads pretty simply, don't you think?

    Good Lord!

    Yes, they taught us where our authority comes from. They also tried to pound into everyone's head that the officer is always right and the "civilians" (their term) WILL obey you. That is what the problem with modern American police depts is. The Thin Blue Line Mentality and militarization has basically wrecked the American police system. There are just way too many badge and gun heavy types as cops anymore, and most depts will cover for them, not matter what they do.
  • RugerNinerRugerNiner Member Posts: 12,636 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Here's a non cop bashing site.
    http://www.madison.com/wsj/home/local/316015
    Keep your Powder dry and your Musket well oiled.
    NRA Lifetime Benefactor Member.
  • JamesRKJamesRK Member Posts: 25,670 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I can't imagine that anybody in their right mind would comply at gunpoint and believing their life was in danger. I damn sure can't imagine anybody would comply under threat of a ticket.

    Sounds like five totally screwed up people to me. I hope they were all drunk, because I'd hate to think they act like that when they're sober.

    I think that town needs a dungaree liberty.
    The road to hell is paved with COMPROMISE.
  • KSUmarksmanKSUmarksman Member Posts: 10,705 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by JamesRK
    I can't imagine that anybody in their right mind would comply at gunpoint and believing their life was in danger. I damn sure can't imagine anybody would comply under threat of a ticket.

    Sounds like five totally screwed up people to me. I hope they were all drunk, because I'd hate to think they act like that when they're sober.

    I think that town needs a dungaree liberty.


    I agree...to quote the Rabbi inspecting the butcher shop: "oy! something is not kosher here"
    It just seems weird...I would take the ticket and then go to court and make the cops look like asshats
  • leeblackmanleeblackman Member Posts: 5,303 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Man, thats disgusting.
Sign In or Register to comment.