In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Who needs a rifle this powerful?,

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited December 2001 in General Discussion
(Followup) -- The arrest of a Westville man for allegedly possessing "illegal" "assault weapons" and the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 have given state lawmakers new ammunition in the contentious fight to regulate the "powerful guns."
GUN CONTROL URGEDWho needs a rifle this powerful?, lawmakers ask Christopher Hoffman and William Kaempffer, Register Staff December 16, 2001 NEW HAVEN - The arrest of a Westville man for allegedly possessing illegal assault weapons and the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11 have given state lawmakers new ammunition in the contentious fight to regulate the powerful guns. State and local police are continuing the search for the .50-caliber Barrett sniper rifle they believe Charles Cornelius, a 31-year-rold former prepschool student, illegally purchased in May. Authorities seized at least four assault rifles, hand grenades, and white supremacist and hate literature during a search last week of his house."Terrorism isn't just bin Laden supporters," state Rep. Michael P. Lawlor, D-East Haven, said. "It comes in all kinds of forms."Lawlor, a gun control advocate, said Cornelius' arrest - and the realities of the world - should prompt the state legislature to consider more restrictions on these highpower weapons."Sept. 11 added a whole new dimension to the .50-caliber issue," said state Senate Majority Leader George C. Jepsen, DStamford, a longtime gun control advocate who is also running for governor. "There's a growing body of evidence that the .50-caliber is the weapon of choice for terrorists."Earlier this year, the General Assembly passed a ban on the sale of incendiary and armor-piercing ammunition for such guns.And while the gun Cornelius allegedly bought is specifically banned in state statute, other .50-caliber guns remain legal. However, legitimate collectors who purchased Barretts before 1994 can still possess them, according to statute. Lawlor, cochairman of the legislature's Judiciary Committee, said lawmakers should consider banning .50-caliber sniper rifles or requiring their owners to register them with the state."If you shot a burglar with one of these guns, the bullet would go through him, through your door and into your neighbor's house," Lawlor said. "It would be liking using a bazooka."However, not everyone agrees with the gun control legislators.State Rep. Ron San Angelo, R-Naugatuck, a leading gun rights advocate, dismissed the terrorism argument as "silly" and accused Lawlor and Jepsen of scaring people for political gain."To me, this is more about politics than public safety," he said.The state should instead focus on enforcing existing laws, San Angelo said, and should investigate how Cornelius was allegedly able to buy the model of .50-caliber rifle that is illegal in Connecticut.San Angelo also noted that there have been no reported crimes in Connecticut involving .50-caliber sniper rifles, and very few involving assault weapons. Felons armed with handguns commit the vast majority of gun crimes in the state, San Angelo said, and the state should crack down on them instead of passing new restrictions on legal gun ownership."We have to look at public safety in terms of what's really happening on the street," he said. "We should use our resources to go after real problems."The potent Barrett is a lightning rod, horrifying gun control advocates while at the same time it achieves iconic status among its enthusiasts. The rifle costs more than $7,000.The longest-range confirmed sniper kill of the Gulf War was reported to have been made by a Barrett Model 82A1 at a range of 1,800 meters - nearly 2,000 yards, or almost 10 times the maximum effective range of a standard hunting rifle, said Tom Diaz, the author of a study on the weapon by the Violence Police Center, a gun control group in Washington."It's a hell of a gun," said Diaz. "This thing is actually almost a piece of light artillery."According to Diaz, when Barrett introduced the gun to the civilian market in the early 1980s, the U.S. Secret Service argued unsuccessfully that the gun should be outlawed.Barrett, meanwhile, has lobbied against attempts by "left-wing politicians and the media" to restrict or ban sales. The company argues that the weapon has a legitimate place in the sporting marketplace and has spawned widespread interest in long-range shooting competitions in the United States.Meanwhile in New Haven, Cornelius remained jailed on $2.6 million bond and authorities plan to file additional charges in connection with the Barrett.State police investigators have said they had no evidence that Cornelius had planned any attack. However, Cornelius apparently had animosity toward the private Hopkins School, which had expelled him when he was student there in the 1980s. Sources said he was also planning to send hateful letters to some alumni. http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=2793814&BRD=1281&PAG=461&dept_id=7573

Comments

  • Judge DreadJudge Dread Member Posts: 2,372 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    AAA ! I know the literature was to Influence deer in becoming KKK members ,the .50 to get them out of the way if they did not join (thoose far away ) and the grenades for the ones close by ! maybe they will get him for an "expired" hunting licence ....
    Ignis Natura Renovatur Integram
  • JustCJustC Member Posts: 16,056 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Here's my take. If you want a .50 cal, and you can afford a .50 cal, then get one. Just because the bullet will penetrate the lid of a tank at 2000yds (article I read somewhere), doesn't mean he can shoot it that well. Second, this is still a free country. If this guy hadn't given reason to not be allowed to purchase a .22 then he should be able to buy a .50. Now I am saying that this stands for those of us who are legally able to purchase firearms. Some people buy art, this is useless, you hang it and look at it. Same idea as a .50. If you want to buy it, buy it! I don't think that even a small percentage of .50 owners will want to pay for the bullets more than a couple times a year at best.
  • BullzeyeBullzeye Member Posts: 3,560
    edited November -1
    Well I guess the fifty-cals are gonna end up in the same category as a bayonet now. If a Liberal cant think up why he personally would need one, then no one needs or should have one.But hey, at least they are protecting the populace from drive by bayonettings and drive by Barret .50 snipings.
  • sandman2234sandman2234 Member Posts: 894 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Somebody's breaking in the backdoor. 'cuse me while I go past my pistols and shotgun and drag out the almost 40 pound .50BMG to shoot him with. If I can lug it to the back of the house before he hears me, I may have a chance to knock him off and take out the neighbors tank in one shot. Who are we electing to office these days?????
    Have Gun, will travel
  • turboturbo Member Posts: 820 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    1800 meters? 10 times effective range of a standard hunting rifle?Something doesn't sound right here.This piece should have been edited, by the EDITOR prior to printing.Anyhow, whats wrong taking a shot at a deer, or other varmints 2000 meters out, how can anyone get good at long distance shootin unless he practices. \The old Springfield Trapdoor Carbines in 50 cal had a range of 1400 yards, according to handbook.50 cal is 50 cal., I suppose they will be outlawing old muzzleloaders now...Bunch of bed wetters.
Sign In or Register to comment.