In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

9mm vs. .40

SilentKnightSilentKnight Member Posts: 2,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited July 2005 in General Discussion
Does a +p 9mm round come close to the ballistics of a "normal" .40 round?

Comments

  • WarbirdsWarbirds Member Posts: 16,904 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    You decide, personally I'll still take the .40 any day of the week over a 9mm. Only the real hot +P 9mm loads beat the real light .40 S&W loads in energy, the +P loads do get the edge (barely) in muzzle velocity. I'll take energy over muzzle velocity for stopping power. These loads I picked show energy at the muzzle the farther out you go, the greater the energy loss for the 9mm while the .40 does a better job of staying closer to it's muzzle energy.

    Here's you're plus P bullets (9mm)

    Black hills 115 grain

    muzzle velocity 1300 fps

    engergy 431 ft/lbs

    Remington 115 grain +P

    muzzle velocity 1250

    energy 399 ft/lbs

    Here's a few "normal" .40 S&W rounds


    Hornady 155 grain JHP

    muzzle velocity 1180

    energy 479 ft/lbs

    Winchester 155 grain silver tip hollow point

    muzzle velocity 1205

    energy 500 ft/lbs





    R/

    Dave


    How different the world would be if we could consult the veteran instead of the politician. - Henry Miller
  • Ghost Town PosseGhost Town Posse Member Posts: 133 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Forget the 9 stick with the .40
    quote:I'll take energy over muzzle velocity for stopping power. These loads I picked show energy at the muzzle the farther out you go, the greater the energy loss for the 9mm while the .40 does a better job of staying closer to it's muzzle energy.

    Couldn't have said it better[:p]

    163500_item.jpgSomeday when I'm cool I'll have a .50

    Me own a 9mm...I'd rather drink turpentine and piss on a brush fire!
  • gap1916gap1916 Member Posts: 4,977
    edited November -1
    Forget the 40 go with a 10mm [8D]

    Greg
    Former
    USMC
    ANGLICO
  • matwormatwor Member Posts: 20,594
    edited November -1
    Forget the 10 mm, go with a .45. Sorry bambi, just had to chime in.[:D][;)]

    "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing."

    Edmund Burke
  • Ghost Town PosseGhost Town Posse Member Posts: 133 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Or try this one
    guns4less_1075293242_P1250155.JPG

    163500_item.jpgSomeday when I'm cool I'll have a .50

    Me own a 9mm...I'd rather drink turpentine and piss on a brush fire!
  • SilentKnightSilentKnight Member Posts: 2,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    AHHHH! I dont need a .50 AE! I want one, but I dont need one right now.

    Im going to be using it for IDPA matches. So I can go with 9mm with 31 rounds magazines for plinking, or go with the Glock 22 and have the ability to have .40 and .357 SIG.
  • Colt SuperColt Super Member Posts: 31,007
    edited November -1
    Nice work, Son.

    There are a few(very few) reasons to select a 9MM over a .40S&W for a self defense round. One is that, because the 9MM has a better ballistic coefficient it will have a little flatter trajectory. It will also have deeper penetration in full metal jacket configuration. Another reason would be more cartridges in pre-ban double stack mags. For instance, a Browning Hi-Power has a total of 14 round capacity in 9MM and 11 in .40.

    There also classic firearms, like the P-38 and Hi-Power, that just seem to be "right" in 9MM.

    For self defense, the best .40 S&W loads are far superior to the best 9MM loads.

    God Bless America and...
    NEVER Forget WACO
    NEVER, EVER Forget 911
  • Ghost Town PosseGhost Town Posse Member Posts: 133 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Just kiddin!(about the .50) go with the Glock 22

    163500_item.jpgSomeday when I'm cool I'll have a .50

    Me own a 9mm...I'd rather drink turpentine and piss on a brush fire!
  • tomh.tomh. Member Posts: 3,833 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Now, come on guys....we've all read the magazines and all the opinions must be right. A 9mm is absolutely worthless for any purpose, especially for defense. You'd be better off sticking your finger out and saying "bang!" [}:)]
  • pickenuppickenup Member Posts: 22,844 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have not ran the numbers.
    Is 40 scored major or minor?

    The gene pool needs chlorine.
  • jsergovicjsergovic Member Posts: 5,526
    edited November -1
    My Ruger KP-89 was a flawless-feeding gun (that didn't fit (9mm).

    I prefer the 40S&W, but never had 100% feeding (didn't take the time, and sold it.

    I have a new 40S&W in the pipeline, which is suposedly great...we'll see.
  • bigdaddyjuniorbigdaddyjunior Member Posts: 11,233
    edited November -1
    I've had a couple 40's in compact and sub compact versions. Even for me they were a lot to handle in a light little gun. I prefer the 9mm in a smaller gun. If I go with a full size gun I'd just as soon carry a 45 or the new 10mm I got last week. I really think the 40 is something else in a carbine length gun though.

    040103cowboy_shooting_one_gun_md_clr_prv.gifBig Daddy my heros have always been cowboys,they still are it seems
  • 0341USMC0341USMC Member Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    .40s are great even when you use Black Talons

    0341USMC
    SEMPER FI
    Christian
    American
    heterosexual
    PRO GUN
    conservative
    Any Questions?
  • trusta45trusta45 Member Posts: 516 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Both rounds have their own certain plus factors.
    9mm=
    low recoil
    low noise and flash
    high mag capacity potential even in smaller compact models
    very cheap ammunition available almost everywhere
    -
    .40s&w=
    larger bullet
    good oss record
    not much more recoil noise or flash than a 9mm
    ammo just about as cheap
    so the way I look at it is if your a beleiver in the bigger hole theory go with .40,if you want a easier shooting gun with more rounds to offer go with the 9mm and get alot more practice for the money.Either way you go you will have a descent defense gun.9mm is not so weak it will not put someone down but there is a reason alot of the 9mm shooters went to the .40 and never looked back.I tend to lean toward the bigger hole theory myself so Im pretty sure I would pick .40.

    "A gun is as good or bad as the man using it"
    -Shane-
  • mudgemudge Member Posts: 4,225 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Given those two choices, I'd have to go with the bigger bore.
    As far as magazine capacity goes, if the difference between winning and losing means I have to shoot the perp 14 times (14 v 11) I'm already in deep doggie doo.
    Get a man's gun...a .45acp for Zeus' sake!

    Mudge the .45 fan

    I can't come to work today. The voices said, STAY HOME AND CLEAN THE GUNS!
  • SilentKnightSilentKnight Member Posts: 2,607 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    A .45 is big and slow.[:)] I think im going for the .40 and .357 SIG.
  • Rebel_JamesRebel_James Member Posts: 4,746
    edited November -1
    When thinking about getting a pistol for self-defense, the number one rule is:

    Make damn sure the caliber starts with the number.......4 !!!



    "If they won't give us good terms, come back and we'll fight it out."
    -- Gen. James Longstreet
  • kingjoeykingjoey Member Posts: 8,636
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by SilentKnight
    A .45 is big and slow.[:)] I think im going for the .40 and .357 SIG.


    Yep, a bus is big and slow too, but it'll sure ruin your day if you're on the receiving end[;)]

    BillCat.gif

    SUPPORT THE I.N.S. , THE COUNTRY THEY SAVE COULD BE YOUR OWN
  • BerettafanBerettafan Member Posts: 592 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    A 9mm IS JUST FINE UNTIL SOMEONE LOSES AN EYE...

    If those are the only choices, go .40.

    All it takes for evil to prevail is that good men do nothing.

    For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration; the streets are safer, the police are more effective, and the rest of the world will follow us into history--Hitler 1937
  • offerorofferor Member Posts: 8,625 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    Given the two choices, I'll tell you how much better I like the .40 -- I'd even rather have a Browning Hi-Power in .40. And that's saying something, given it's a classic 9mm platform.

    The only places I'd prefer a 9mm is overseas, or where my main access was to military re-supply, since 9mm might be a lot easier to get in both situations. Otherwise, I believe the .40 is -- in short -- a better fight stopper.

    T. Jefferson: "[When doing Constitutional interpretation], let us [go] back to the time when [it] was adopted. [Rather than] invent a meaning [let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

    NRAwethepeople.jpgNRA Life Member fortbutton2.gif
  • NorCalMattNorCalMatt Member Posts: 92 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    (flame away)

    Actually according to studies of thousands of real incidents the round that carries the most "one shot stop and kill" power is from hydraulic shock.... (simmilar to throwing a rock in a pond...the ripples, considering the body is mostly water)

    According to the studies a lightweight hollowpoint (#1 is .357 (what grain I forgot)#2 is 9mm in 115 gr hollow point) has more real life stopping power then a 145gr 9mm, or 240+gr .45 or even .44 mag.

    The study was on over 5,000 real police shootings with various calibers and loads.
  • cletus85cletus85 Member Posts: 2,104 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:There are a few(very few) reasons to select a 9MM over a .40S&W for a self defense round. One is that, because the 9MM has a better ballistic coefficient it will have a little flatter trajectory. This couldn't and shouldn't be considered at handgun ranges.
  • BerettafanBerettafan Member Posts: 592 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I would like to know if they compared the shot placement of the rounds. All the data points to the .40 as being ballistically superior. The 9mm can be a little flatter in trajectory, but in all reality, how many people are going to take a long shot with a pistol in self defense? The .40 releases more energy into the target, and the penetration is balanced better to avoid over penetration. In addition, a .40 isn't stopped as easily as a 9mm when shooting through obstacles if necessary (i.e. heavy car doors, windshields, etc.) As a matter of fact, one of the articles I read (I believe by Massad Ayoob, but I could be wrong) stated that according to their study, .357 and .40 performed the best through windshields. I am not necessarily dogging the 9mm, but it is not my first choice. MHO

    All it takes for evil to prevail is that good men do nothing.

    For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration; the streets are safer, the police are more effective, and the rest of the world will follow us into history--Hitler 1937
  • SGMBalzSGMBalz Member Posts: 219 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    [^]I am a 1911 man myself, yes it has some kick. It is a man stopper, and I have been some places, where you need a man stopper.

    will this thing reach that far?
  • kingjoeykingjoey Member Posts: 8,636
    edited November -1
    Boy, wreckage from the past[;)]

    Love them Beavers
    orst-title-1.gif
  • select-fireselect-fire Member Posts: 69,446 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by SilentKnight
    Does a +p 9mm round come close to the ballistics of a "normal" .40 round?


    To actually answer your question. . .yes. . .and no.

    The 9mms shoot a lighter bullet faster than the .40s. So they do have a slightly flatter trajectory, though at reasonable handgun distances of under 50 yards, that isnt really a factor.

    The hottest available 9mm +Ps put out about 450 foot pounds; the normal .40s put out about the same (say 420-520) some less, some more, depends on exact load).

    But even though they put out comparable amounts of energy the .40 does it with a heavier bullet. All else being equal, given similar energies, the one with the heavier bullet (and larger diameter bullet) will make a better stopper.

    There is no question that .40 is a better stopper, but most emphatically its NOT "way better" than the best 9mms. The best available 9mm 115 grain +Ps have a documented one shot stop percentage of about 91%. Compare that to 94% for the best .40s, and 96% for the best .45s and .357 magnums, and you'll see that 9mms aren't quite as bad as many think they are. (Compare it to 80% OSS for the best .38+Ps).

    Advantages of 9mm over .40 are higher capacity, greater ammunition availability, greater firearm availability, and significantly lower cost (if you like, meaning more rounds fireable in training for the same cost). When you add these things together, they may reasonably outweigh the relatively small stopping power disadvantage of the 9mm over the .40.
  • stevegsteveg Member Posts: 845 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I have both 9 mm and 40 cal if im going to be shooting all day I would rather shoot the 9mm its a little bit lighter
  • jimbowbyjimbowby Member Posts: 3,496
    edited November -1
    [8D]--At 6 yds , what the hell do you care about "FLAT" trajectory[?][?][?]--you want "ONE" shot stop--oh yea , if you're nervous 3 shots--forget 9 MM, 22lf,, 40 cal stick with .45 and do a little PRACTICE--Big deal, save YOUR life[:)][:)][:)][:D]

    I'm only wearing Black untill they make something darker
  • bleubleu Member Posts: 92
    edited November -1
    most of the .45 loads aint a LICK better, if any, than the better 9mm loads. Some of the 9mm loads are right at 500 ft lbs, ya know. 90 grs at 1550 fps, for instance, from CorBon. Contrary to bs you read everywhere, they penetrate plenty deeply enough.
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by bleu
    most of the .45 loads aint a LICK better, if any, than the better 9mm loads. Some of the 9mm loads are right at 500 ft lbs, ya know. 90 grs at 1550 fps, for instance, from CorBon. Contrary to bs you read everywhere, they penetrate plenty deeply enough.


    Of course this thread quickly degenerates into the old 45 vs 9mm thing thats been done to DEATH. The bottom line here is it depends on WHICH BULLET you're talking about a lot more than which caliber.

    The "45 or nothing" diehards won't believe it, but if its 115 grain 9mm +P vs. 230 grain 45 ACP hardball? That's not even debatable.

    The 9mm +P is **MUCH** BETTER. The 9mm will give you 450 ft-lbs of energy for about a 90% one shot stop percentage versus only 62% for the .45 hardball (350 ft-lbs). No suprise when you figure that 9mm +P is pushing its .354 caliber bullet nearly at 357 magnum velocities. Hell, even ordinary hardball (Winchester white box at $7 a box) 115 grain 9mm is marginally better than 45, giving you a 70% OSS%.

    (Yes. ..read that again, crappy ordinary 9mm is actually BETTER than ordinary 45ACP!)

    When you strip away the mythology and look at real street shootings, the dirty truth is that hardball 45 actually isn't really all that good. The 1911 pistol is excellent, and that has a lot to do with the historical popularity of the round. If you compare it to the weak .38 specials that it was designed to replace, its clearly superior. But in the modern civilian world? Forget it. . .hardball 45ACP is a dog. It tends to overpenetrate, wasting some of its energy and posing a risk to bystanders.

    The thing of it is, 9mm +P vs 45 isn't really a fair comparison. You're comparing a non expanding military ball round that's nearly 100 years old to a expanding modern round maximized for use in modern high-pressure pistols.

    Apply those same design principles to the 45, and you end up with rounds that are literally as good as anything out there, and better than almost all of them. The 45 hydroshoks work as well as the famous hot 357 magnum, and if you compare THOSE to 9mm (any 9mm), the 45 is clearly better!
  • tr foxtr fox Member Posts: 13,856
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by beantownshootah
    quote:Originally posted by SilentKnight
    Does a +p 9mm round come close to the ballistics of a "normal" .40 round?


    To actually answer your question. . .yes. . .and no.

    The 9mms shoot a lighter bullet faster than the .40s. So they do have a slightly flatter trajectory, though at reasonable handgun distances of under 50 yards, that isnt really a factor.

    The hottest available 9mm +Ps put out about 450 foot pounds; the normal .40s put out about the same (say 420-520) some less, some more, depends on exact load).

    But even though they put out comparable amounts of energy the .40 does it with a heavier bullet. All else being equal, given similar energies, the one with the heavier bullet (and larger diameter bullet) will make a better stopper.

    There is no question that .40 is a better stopper, but most emphatically its NOT "way better" than the best 9mms. The best available 9mm 115 grain +Ps have a documented one shot stop percentage of about 91%. Compare that to 94% for the best .40s, and 96% for the best .45s and .357 magnums, and you'll see that 9mms aren't quite as bad as many think they are. (Compare it to 80% OSS for the best .38+Ps).

    Advantages of 9mm over .40 are higher capacity, greater ammunition availability, greater firearm availability, and significantly lower cost (if you like, meaning more rounds fireable in training for the same cost). When you add these things together, they may reasonably outweigh the relatively small stopping power disadvantage of the 9mm over the .40.




    HEhehehe, I knew there would be a way that I would find to like you. I will now go and admire/clean my numerous 9mm handguns and carbines and countless mags and stacks of ammo [;)]

    4lizad
Sign In or Register to comment.