Brady Campaign Ask Ashcroft to Recuse Himself From Decisions Affecting Firearm Policy

Josey1

Brady Campaign and Million Mom March Ask Ashcroft to Recuse Himself From Decisions Affecting Firearms Policy To: National Desk Contact: Amy Stilwell or Nancy Hwa, 202-898-0792, both of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence WASHINGTON, Feb. 6 /U.S. Newswire/ -- In a letter delivered today, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence united with the Million Mom March asked U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft to recuse himself from all matters related to firearms policy. In January, Ashcroft announced that he would recuse himself from the investigation of Enron Corporation because he had received approximately $50,000 dollars in campaign contributions from Enron in his failed 2000 Senate re-election Campaign. Citing the Enron recusal, the Brady Campaign is requesting that Attorney General Ashcroft also remove himself from firearms policy decisions, as he benefited from more than $370,000 in campaign contributions from the gun industry and the National Rifle Association (NRA) in the 2000 election cycle -- an amount that exceeds far Enron's political donations. "We commend John Ashcroft for his decision to recuse himself from any decisions related to the Enron investigation based on significant campaign contributions he had received from Enron," said Michael D. Barnes, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. "Attorney General Ashcroft is wise to avoid even the appearance of impropriety that might result from taking an action affecting a major political donor. "To be consistent, we urge Mr. Ashcroft to also recuse himself from all decisions related to firearms policy. Here, we have a situation in which the Attorney General has benefited from more than $370,000 in contributions from the gun lobby and the firearms industry -- a powerful special interest that has been on the receiving end of several favorable policy decisions made by Mr. Ashcroft over the last year. "Now, more than ever, Americans deserve to know that key policy makers like Attorney General Ashcroft -- the nation's top law enforcement official -- are making decisions based on the best interests of all Americans and not just those of narrow special interests with deep pockets. The firearms policies that Mr. Ashcroft has implemented raise serious questions about whether the Attorney General has been unduly influenced by firearm interests at the expense of gun violence victims." Specifically, the Brady Campaign's letter cites several examples of undue access and influence by the gun lobby: -- After the September 11 terrorist attacks, Ashcroft refused the FBI's request to use National Instant Background Check (NICS) records to determine whether any of the individuals detained on suspicion of terrorism had been approved to buy guns. This widely criticized decision compromised law enforcement efforts to enhance homeland security and was wholly inconsistent with the Attorney General's otherwise aggressive treatment of the detainees. The only supporters and apparent beneficiaries of this decision seem to be the gun lobby. -- In July 2001, Ashcroft sided with the NRA and moved to drastically reduce (to one day) the amount of time that the FBI must retain critical background check records on gun sales. The FBI has previously stated that such records should be retained for at least 90 days to ensure the integrity of the background check system. -- In May 2001, Ashcroft wrote a letter to the National Rifle Association formulating a new Department of Justice Policy toward gun laws that could make it easier for criminals to challenge their convictions in gun cases and, therefore, easier for dangerous convicted criminals to reinstate their ability to purchase a firearm. The Attorney General sent this letter even though it was at odds with the official U.S. legal position in litigation (United States v. Emerson) that was pending at the time. KEYWORDS: POLICY, LAW, GUNS/FIREARMS http://www.usnewswire.com -0- /U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/ 02/06 17:11 Copyright 2002, U.S. Newswire http://www.usnewswire.com/topnews/temp/0206-154.html

salzo

Now we see why recusing himself from the Enron nonsense was a dumb move on Ashcrofts part.

---

Happiness is a warm gun

sandman2234

Does this mean anybody that accepts funds from the million (actually probably just thousands) moms or the brady bunch have to recuse themselves? That would elimenate the arkansas (spelled New York) witch and Teddy too, wouldn't it?

---

Have Gun, will travel

cpileri

Another mislead and half-truth by the Brady Bunch:As Attorney General, he is ALLOWED to and SUPPOSED to make decisions regarding law, lik ethe Constitution and Bill of Rights.So there is no problem for him to keep right on making firearms policy.Removing himself from making business policy, in light of taking big contributions from Enron, is perhaps the right thing to do. Enron is not a Constitutional Ammendment.Carl

salzo

cpilleri- What does law have to do with it? We are talking about the children.If the Supreme court ever hears a second amendment case, you can bet the antis will ask Scalia to recuse himself, because he is a hunter.

---

Happiness is a warm gun

mudge

Since the Justice Dept. is charged with enforcing the law and not making policy, I don't see where the gun-grabbers have a point here.It's the DOJ's job to enforce the Bill of Rights (and all laws) as written. They don't get to decide (ie. make policy) whether those rights are right or wrong. Recuse himself my *!Mudge the shyster

---

I can't come to work today. The voices said, STAY HOME AND CLEAN THE GUNS!