In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Brady Campaign Statement on Arming Airline Pilots (9/29/2001)

Josey1Josey1 Member Posts: 9,598 ✭✭
edited October 2001 in General Discussion
Brady Campaign Statement on Arming Airline Pilots (Washington, D.C.) Michael D. Barnes, President of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, today issued the following statement regarding recent proposals to increase airline security by arming pilots of commercial aircraft: "The terrorist attacks of September 11 have inspired, and rightly so, a national debate regarding how best to heighten security at U.S. airports and on commercial flights. In this difficult time, we understand the intense fears of airline pilots, passengers and crew following the horrific hijackings, and we support doing everything we can to strengthen aircraft and airport security. "However, we do have some serious concerns about recent proposals to arm airline pilots. Safety begins with prevention. We need to make sure that armed terrorists are not able to board aircraft in the first place. In addition to dramatically increasing security at the airport (for instance, enhancing cockpit security and intensifying passenger and luggage screening), there are tangible things we can do to make our 'homeland' safer. "These measures include requiring background checks on all gun sales to prevent criminals, and would-be terrorists, from obtaining guns, and retaining records of gun purchases, so that weapons can be traced if they are used in a crime or terrorist act. If we can detect terrorists while they are attempting to amass their arsenals, we can help to prevent future attacks and take a key step forward in the effort to boost the security of all Americans. "Over the coming weeks and months, we can expect to see many proposals geared toward augmenting security on commercial flights. These proposals, in particular the question of whether to arm pilots, should be considered with great care. There are a number of questions that need to be answered before we proceed. Can we ensure that a weapon on an airplane will not fall into the wrong hands? Could firing the gun in a plane compromise its integrity, causing it to crash? When would pilots be authorized to use guns? "The FBI and the Federal Aviation Administration are looking at this issue, and we support their desire to study it. At a minimum, we need to ensure that anyone armed on a plane meets strict qualifications and is trained as a sworn federal law enforcement officer. Air marshals are an appropriate response to stopping terrorism in the air because they are law enforcement officers who are continually trained in firearms safety, appropriate use of force, and shoot/don't-shoot scenarios. Trained air marshals would have one purpose, which is to monitor the airplane and protect the passengers and crew. "Finally, models exist for preventing terrorism on aircraft without arming pilots. One such example is El Al, the Israeli airlines. I have traveled on El Al and was impressed with its security program. While we cannot draw exact parallels between the El Al and the entire U.S. airline industry, we should closely examine all such models and learn from their experience." http://www.bradycampaign.org/press/release.asp?Record=346

Comments

  • LowriderLowrider Member Posts: 6,587
    edited November -1
    What a load of doublespeak crap.I can't believe they're not calling for boxcutter control.
  • badboybobbadboybob Member Posts: 1,658 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ditto. Doublespeak is what they are good at.
  • dheffleydheffley Member Posts: 25,000
    edited November -1
    Some folks just can't get it, can they!
    Save, research, then buy the best.Join the NRA, NOW!Teach them young, teach them safe, teach them forever, but most of all, teach them to VOTE!
  • Evil ATFEvil ATF Member Posts: 1,195 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    That didn't take them long.
  • landislandis Member Posts: 230 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I work for an airline. I see paperwork (before 9-11) that allowed "fisheries Protection Officers" and "Postal Inspectors" to cary a gun on an airliner. I guess fish and letters deserve more protection than airliner passengers...
  • LowriderLowrider Member Posts: 6,587
    edited November -1
    Even security people from the Smithsonian can legally carry on an airliner.But the pilots??? NAH!!!!
  • Walt NunleyWalt Nunley Member Posts: 228 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I want to be the first person to demand ink pen control,pencil control,credit card control,belt control,shoelace control,and brief case control because they can all be used as weapons
    Submarine Sailor,Truck Driver,and very bad typist.GO RUSTY #2
  • RembrandtRembrandt Member Posts: 4,486 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    I think it's time to buy a new leather gun sling and start breaking it in on some of those Brady types....I guess if you can't beat any sense into them, at least you'll end up with a softer leather sling and you'll feel better afterwards. heehee(If that went over anyones head, see post for "Breaking in New Gun Slings)
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Okay...they say that "Safety begins with prevention". Then they immediately go into the fact that retaining records on gun transactions will enable them to trace weapons used in a terrorist incident. Isn't that an after-the-fact incident? Who cares where they bought the gun or who bought the gun? If the incident already occurred, tracing it isn't going to do a bit of good.
  • IconoclastIconoclast Member Posts: 10,515 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Note that Barnes cites El Al as a model to be followed, conveniently overlooking / obscuring the fact that their pilots are, in fact, armed. Once the military campaign is completed, I really do think Afghanistan would benefit from his company. With enough BS, crops will grow anywhere.
  • PathfinderPathfinder Member Posts: 25 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    "These measures include requiring background checks on all gun sales to prevent criminals, and would-be terrorists, from obtaining guns". Those wretched imbiciles think terrorists buy their guns from the local shop or what? Hello people, terrorists buy their guns in places you didn't even know existed. These Brady people have got to be the most ignorant I have ever seen.
  • .250Savage.250Savage Member Posts: 812 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ignorant? Hardly. That's the part that infuriates me the most. They know full well what they say is a lie, and they're depending on that. Propaganda to frighten the sheeple into supporting them.
    I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.--Voltare
Sign In or Register to comment.