In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
In your opinion would this be morally wrong
Nighthawk
Member Posts: 12,022 ✭✭✭
I found an add for M-1 Garands for sale,Ive been wanting one really bad for a long time.I read the add only to find out the Goverment was offering them for sale,unissued original GI,price was not disclosed.But I read on to find out they were availiable to active or Honorabley Discharged Military Personnel only.And to purchase one you had to write or contact a Army Base in Florida,for further details.I work with some guys who were enlisted before they joined the force,and said they would be glad to get one and let me buy it.I know its legal if the guns are reasonabley priced and what I want.I could have them get one and sell it to me.I feel that it might be unethical for me to do this.I dont want to take something away from a Vet.I dont know how many they are,or even if they are what I want.Would you give me your views on the Matter,Im probably not going to do it,something just tells me its wrong.And I sure wouldnt enjoy it feeling that way.May I have your opinions Please?
Thanks in Advance!
Rugster
Thanks in Advance!
Rugster
Comments
"A wise man is a man that realizes just how little he knows"
When Clinton left office they gave him a 21 gun salute. Its a damn shame they all missed....
Jim
- Life NRA Member
"If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
It just occurred to me that it might be MORE morally wrong not to give one or two of those nice new Garands a good home with members of this sterling board. When you ask them how much, I expect a suitable "goal post victory dance" if they reply in the neighborhood of $400 rather than $800.
- Life NRA Member
"If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878
Veritas morsum, autem veritas est verus
WOOF.
I might not always tell you the truth, but I will never lie to you!
For firearms there are things like the CMP, and there might be some other program happening in this case, but I'd recommend you look at things real carefully before sending anyone any money.
As for your "moral question", as long as there is no stipulation that the purchasing vet. is supposed to keep the rifle, I'd say go for it!
Best!!
Rugster
See the link for information on the program.
http://www.odcmp.com
The Government doesn't sale used arms that way, and DOD doesn't let them go directly to civilians. Someone doing this would have to have an FFL.
Do not fall for this one.
Trinity +++
"Train up a child in the way he should go, even when he is old he will not depart from it."(Proverbs 22:6)
Maybe you can find some to sell their guns...
For the mother-sister issue you know in advance one is used so get the other with papers ....(Brand new)
HARRR HARRR HARRR !
JD
400 million cows can't be wrong ( EAT GRASS !!! )
Those people who see nothing but grey areas, no black and white, are lost in the fog.
I am right down the street from Macdill, was there a number or P.O.C to contact? sounds fishy but I'll check into if you like
Bob
- Life NRA Member
"If cowardly & dishonorable men shoot unarmed men with army guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary...and not by general deprivation of constitutional privilege." - Arkansas Supreme Court, 1878