In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.

Ban Cars, NOT GUNS!!!!!

ironjohn929ironjohn929 Member Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
edited October 2004 in General Discussion
I recently researched the incident of GUN DEATHS verses AUTO DEATHS. On the CDC website under "National Vital Statistics Report 2001", I found the following STATS:

Auto Related Deaths: 42443
Firearm Related Deaths: 29573

The interesting thing is that of the 29573 gun deaths, 16869 were deemed suicide. That means over half CHOSE to take their own life by firearm. I wonder if in the event that they didn't have a gun, they would have found another way to end it.

My point is this: There are far more deaths from auto accdents than guns, so why aren't we trying to ban cars instead of guns?

Comments

  • roger2fanroger2fan Member Posts: 19 ✭✭
    edited November -1
    You know what wrong here, You get Killed with a Car and no one cares, But a Gun and it's front page for days???

    Roger2fan
  • kenneth and melissakenneth and melissa Member Posts: 1,043 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    Ban cars ? That is ridiculous. Of course so is banning guns. You want to ban something ? Ban zippers. Only those who tried to zip up to fast after relieving themselves would understand.[:0]

    Thomas Jefferson, of Virginia:
    "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man."
    Mad_moose.gifDiani.gif
    7e_1_b.jpg
  • beantownshootahbeantownshootah Member Posts: 12,776 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by ironjohn929
    I recently researched the incident of GUN DEATHS verses AUTO DEATHS. On the CDC website under "National Vital Statistics Report 2001", I found the following STATS:

    Auto Related Deaths: 42443
    Firearm Related Deaths: 29573

    The interesting thing is that of the 29573 gun deaths, 16869 were deemed suicide. That means over half CHOSE to take their own life by firearm. I wonder if in the event that they didn't have a gun, they would have found another way to end it.

    My point is this: There are far more deaths from auto accdents than guns, so why aren't we trying to ban cars instead of guns?


    It gets worse. As you say, over half of American firearms related deaths (58%) are suicides, and about 38% are homicides. (The rest presumeably being "accidents").

    But of the 38% that are homicides, more than 1/3 of those are drug/gang related murders (sadly, mostly minorities are involved, too).

    Take out suicides and deaths secondary to the black market for drugs and America is left with only about 10,000 gun homicides per year. So more people die every year in the USA from influenza than from non gang/drug-related murders.

    For all the talk of high American gun death rates, if you look at the "big picture" America doesn't do very badly:

    http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvintl.html

    This article isn't specifically about guns, but its really a very nuanced look at the subject of American homicide:

    http://www.haciendapub.com/stolinsky1.html
  • TheBrassManTheBrassMan Member Posts: 3,807 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:Originally posted by kenneth and melissa
    Ban cars ? That is ridiculous. Of course so is banning guns. You want to ban something ? Ban zippers. Only those who tried to zip up to fast after relieving themselves would understand.[:0]


    OUCH!!
    Done that a few times in my life[:(!]
    In the 40 odd years my father-in-law has been a gun dealer he has only had one gun sold
    that was used in a crime. That crime was a suicide.


    Nowhere in the U.S. Constitution does it state: "Seperation of Church and State".

    "Those who beat their guns into plow shares; will plow for those who don't."

    62038332.jpgawcountdown.gif

    "Isaiah 5:20 ?Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!"
  • CrittergitterCrittergitter Member Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:quote]


    OUCH!!

    In the 40 odd years my father-in-law has been a gun dealer he has only had one gun sold
    that was used in a crime. That crime was a suicide.







    That right there says something, I don't care who you are.

    quote: he has only had one gun sold




    If you want to be a creative writer, and make up stories, go work for the New York Times.
  • CrittergitterCrittergitter Member Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    just funnin'.

    Point taken. Well made, also!

    If you want to be a creative writer, and make up stories, go work for the New York Times.
  • gap1916gap1916 Member Posts: 4,977
    edited November -1
    Yes I agree. Lets ban those very very bad assault automobiles. You know the ones. Spoilers on the back. Mag rims. Scoops on the hood. All black or red. Lets start a movement. What do you say? [8D] Lets also get some of these automobiles to be put into a Class 2 catagory. Yes SUV and SUT. I think we may have something here.[:D]The pre ban 60's sport cars will be exempt. You will have a limit of 2 pre ban fetures on you new car.

    Greg
    Former Marine
    A N G L I C O
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    As much as the NRA gets bashed by GB'ers......

    Wayne LaPierre drew a better comparison between guns and cars in one of the books that he wrote. He made an even better case for banning cars over guns even though it was completely satirical.
  • Jake_S-83Jake_S-83 Member Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    man, my truck has a gun rack in it. i dont stand a chance.[:D]
  • RoadkillRoadkill Member Posts: 509 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    quote:The interesting thing is that of the 29573 gun deaths, 16869 were deemed suicide. That means over half CHOSE to take their own life by firearm. I wonder if in the event that they didn't have a gun, they would have found another way to end it.


    Then they would have chosen to die of asphyxia in their garages and the new count would be:

    Auto Related Deaths: 59312
    Firearm Related Deaths: 12704
    [:D]

    NRA LIFE MEMBER, COP, AND PRO-GUN!
  • ironjohn929ironjohn929 Member Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    idsman,

    Do you know what that book is titled?
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • ironjohn929ironjohn929 Member Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
  • idsman75idsman75 Member Posts: 13,398 ✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    I read "Guns, Crime and Freedom" back in 1998. I checked it out at the library. It's not intensely intellectual and is probably at the level of an 8th-grader. That's probably why I haven't messed with his other books. It's like reading Hemmingway without all of the symbolism and plot elements.
  • SUBMARINERSUBMARINER Member Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    i think you would be as surprised if you investigated childrens deaths from swimming pools and household accidents as well

    SUBMARINE SAILOR,TRUCK DRIVER,RUSTY WALLACE FAN AND AS EVERYONE SO OFTEN POINTS OUT PISS POOR TYPIST e-mail alisonandwalt@charter.net
  • SUBMARINERSUBMARINER Member Posts: 1,362 ✭✭✭✭✭
    edited November -1
    so did you ever do the research i asked

    SUBMARINE SAILOR,TRUCK DRIVER,RUSTY WALLACE FAN AND AS EVERYONE SO OFTEN POINTS OUT PISS POOR TYPIST e-mail alisonandwalt@charter.net
Sign In or Register to comment.