In order to participate in the GunBroker Member forums, you must be logged in with your GunBroker.com account. Click the sign-in button at the top right of the forums page to get connected.
On a more serious note.......................
Big Sky Redneck
Member Posts: 19,752 ✭✭✭
First off I take 99.9% of what I read in the mags not with a grain of salt but a spoonfull. I consider most of the writings biased and very opinionated. Everything from gun manufacturers, calibers and most everything else I feel is written not as a nuetral view but as a personal one. Like all the bickering about the M16s versus the commie guns, you find an article smashing the M16 and praising an AK47 and I can find one that dissagress with yours.
I read alot of Amercan Handgunner because I like the stories by Massad Ayoob and a few other columns. There is one writer in that mag named Ken Hackathorn that loves to run down the IPSC and claim that anyone who shoots IPSC will not survive a defense situation. Now I want to ask those of you who shoot IPSC or have in the past, if Mr. Hackathorn is correct in his assumptions. Every other article this man writes is negative towards IPSC and I want to know if this is all personal opinion of his or does it have merit. I have never shot IPSC for one because I'm not that good with a handgun and two there are no matches within a 100 miles of here, I would rather got to shotgun matches and bow shoots.
So how 'bout it, if I decide to take up IPSC will I become a risk in a life or death situation? If IPSC is so bad and teaches very bad habits as he says, what are some good compititions that will help in defense situations as well as be entertaining?
Like I said, I generally read these for entertainment instead of education but this debate of his has been going on for awhile now and curiosity is getting to me.
I read alot of Amercan Handgunner because I like the stories by Massad Ayoob and a few other columns. There is one writer in that mag named Ken Hackathorn that loves to run down the IPSC and claim that anyone who shoots IPSC will not survive a defense situation. Now I want to ask those of you who shoot IPSC or have in the past, if Mr. Hackathorn is correct in his assumptions. Every other article this man writes is negative towards IPSC and I want to know if this is all personal opinion of his or does it have merit. I have never shot IPSC for one because I'm not that good with a handgun and two there are no matches within a 100 miles of here, I would rather got to shotgun matches and bow shoots.
So how 'bout it, if I decide to take up IPSC will I become a risk in a life or death situation? If IPSC is so bad and teaches very bad habits as he says, what are some good compititions that will help in defense situations as well as be entertaining?
Like I said, I generally read these for entertainment instead of education but this debate of his has been going on for awhile now and curiosity is getting to me.
Comments
If I knew then, what I know now.
No matter what form of training you follow, you will revert to trained behavior in stress situations.
As to which one is "realistic" that is a matter of perspective and opinion.
If you ain't got pictures, I wasn't there.
Margaret Thatcher
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics."
Mark Twain